per some previous remarks(1), i was able to get two i386 boxes in a lab to
crash but not panic and core out, makit it impossible to debug this
problem. two i386 machines in the config below would just "reset back to
the bios", as if the reset button had been tapped.
the problem occurs when tw
This is confirmed to work? I suppose that would resolve part of my
problem with 4314/system
~BAS
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 05:02, Runo Forrisdahl wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:40:52PM -0400, Roy Morris wrote:
> | I have been reading through the archives but have not found a reliable
> answer
...a while back, i wrote a tutorial for RAIFRame RAID1 as a root FS on
NetBSD. I used the "bootstrap" method. Sometime not soon after, NetBSD
added RAIDFrame to the INSTALL* kernels and presumably menus to sysinst,
mitigating the need for this approach.
the boostrap process is:
*) do a basi
name exists on the given interface, we do so,
otherwise it goes to the default queue.
* Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-21 17:59]:
I was just curious if any of the developers (or experts) would care to
articulate officially >:}
~BAS
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, William Bloom wrote:
More to the point, "how to find this info".
1: Go to http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi
2: click "apropos"
3: make sure "current" is selected
4: query "sync"
5: click on "sasynchd(8)" and "sasychd.conf(5)"
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=sasyncd&sektion=8&apropos=0&manpath=OpenB
You said you "entered" into those files. Did you vi(1) them mnaually?
Did you rebuild the database afterward? When you finger the user, what
does the shell show up as? Use either vipw(8) as root, to do this, or
use chfn(1) as the user.
~BAS
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, morla wrote:
hello all,
i
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Hello there,
I have 2 openbsd box (that does as well openbgpd but this is not the aim
of this mail).
Question is that any problems to do
sysctl net.inet.carp.preempt=1
and
ifconfig em0 up
ifconfig vlan0 vlan 11 vlandev em0
Each machine must hav
t the FAQ contains
> an
> example much as you describe (as I recall, specifying a queue for -incoming-
> traffic will indeed cause that traffic to be processed through the named queue
> as it is -outgoing-).
>
>
> Bill
>
> Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>> Would anyone
For the record, these systems run 3.7/i386 rock solid. Just forget
entirely about using the "Software Assist RAID" support on the motherboard
and use RAIDFrame instead.
In the BIOS, you can toggle it between "RAID" and "NON-RAID" mode, but it
makes no difference. The kernel probes it just the
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Someone with one of these problematic cards should put it in the
It isn't so much a bug; more so a caveat of Dell's implenentation.
Maybe you can order PowerEdge 1850s w/o a hardware IPMI implementation,
but I don't think it's an issue that warrants
I'll double check this today and verify. Will the IPMI on the
motherboard only work with the onboard ethernet controllers, or will it
get its grubby little hands on any/all controllers it finds? If it only
The IPMI configuration screen gives you the option of configuring which
Interface to bi
The Intel IPMI on the motherboard may be to blame. It's always up/on and
listening.
Also, see my thread in freebsd-questions@ about Dells with Intel em(4) and
Dell PowerEdge switches w/ NIC Teaming, 802.3ad, ng_many2_one, etc.
For example, traffic sent from the IPMI IP/MAC of the interface i
Would anyone like to elaborate on the impacts of using "keep state" on
conjunction with pass rules that assign traffic to queues?
One might assume that inverted traffic flows would also be queued, however
that would break the "traffic can only be queued egress an interface"
rule...
There sho
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Joe S wrote:
Is anyone on the list running an Ultra 5 as firewall? I would like to move my
firewall from an overpowered P4-3GHz box to a Sun Ultra 5 360MHz.
My main concern is wondering if the Ultra 5 is slow enough to become a
bottleneck from one interface to another inte
It's a solaris/sunos thing
~BAS
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 04:16, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can anyone tell me, whether the current naming convention of
> /etc/hostname.if is because of history of /etc/hostname (which has been
> extended) or if there are other reasons. I am just cu
---
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:28:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: misc@openbsd.org, Tony Sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
jared r r spiegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Seamus Wassman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with an Interface, i.e., the "ingress/egress" queue for matching traffic
switched from interface-to-interface.
We keep saying, "you can't queue inbound", which makese sense.
But you need a technique for queuing a "shared ingress"
~BAS
>
> --
> http://2suck.net/hhwl.html - http://www.bsws.de/
> Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
> (Dennis Ritchie)
>
>
--
l8r* --
~ Brian A. Seklecki
"From back in the heady days when 'Help Desk' meant nothing, 'Disk Quota'
meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages
of laser printout...and frequently were."
What platform are you on? Are you compiling it from source?
It works just fine in 3.7/i386.
Just:
bash-3.00# cd /usr/ports/net/ntop && make install clean
If you insist on source, try looking at /usr/ports/net/ntop/patches/*
Try reading about Ports in the FAQ.
~BAS
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12
So have him send the message pre-formatted to the list? HTML?
How about just draw the diagram using ports/graphics/dia/* and export to
PNG, post the URL?
~BAS
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 10:01, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:35:16 +0530, Manpreet Singh Nehra
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna wrote:
I'm currently using an OpenBSD 3.7 as a firewall for my network, since
this machines is a 1U rack I can't add an extra ethernet card to it, so
I was looking for an alternative solution to use redundancy, since there
are plenty of usb ports fr
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Hans-Joerg Hoexer wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:43:34PM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
The URL:
http://digitalfreaks.org/~lavalamp/openbsd_ipsec_generic.png
Outlines the generic cookie-cutter configuration from vpn(8) with
addressing changes. A couple of
RAIDFrame hasn't been updated in two years...
It's stable with the known supported levels.
~BAS
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 21:31, Mathias Mueller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a short question to the community...
>
> Does anybody have experience with raid level 6 on a raidframe software
> raid? Is i
The URL:
http://digitalfreaks.org/~lavalamp/openbsd_ipsec_generic.png
Outlines the generic cookie-cutter configuration from vpn(8) with
addressing changes. A couple of comments on that document:
*) The output of 'netstat -rn -f encap' should probably be included at the
end.
*) ...possibl
The same behavior happens on Dell's serial console redirection. It
happens when you boot FreeBSD too. As soon as the kernel starts output
ANSI characters it goes dead.
Dell lets you toggle between VT100/220 mode and ANSI mode, but it's
unaffected. The kernel output just kills it.
Dell has an o
Please confirm that the following are applicable:
* boot(8), biosboot(8), installboot(8), boot_i386(8) lack any
support for booting off RAIDFrame volumes (a 13 line patch 22
months ago fixed this on the b other side of the isleb (r)).
* No support is planned
*
201 - 225 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
