Re: IPv6 autoconf with static IID?

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021, at 21:05, Mike Fischer wrote: >> Am 28.12.2021 um 13:09 schrieb Paul de Weerd : >> Seems like the simplest way, especially using the lladdr option. > Yes, I’ll give that a try. That’s how I “solved” that problem too, though I’m not too worried about leaking anything, so I jus

Re: [Ver3.6/3.9] Old version need help

At 14:28, cclai wrote: > So I hope that your organization can provide > an installation package "3.6 and 3.9 version" to solve the problem. Try this mirror: • https://ftp.nluug.nl/OpenBSD/3.6/ • https://ftp.nluug.nl/OpenBSD/3.9/

Re: Doubt about sed command into OpenBSD / Dúvida sobre o comando sed no OpenBSD

At 12:44, Paulo Cesar Martins wrote: > May someone help me? You can use the “a” command: sed '/clientenike/a\ nikevoce.com.br ' /etc/squid/liberados The newline before the closing quote doesn’t seem to be required by POSIX, but OpenBSD sed(1) won’t do what you want without it [0]. Note that th

Re: rad(8) question

At 05:25, kolargol wrote: > How should I fix it ? Or what I am doing wrong ? The link-local router address is correct. RFC 4861 § 4.2 says: > Source Address > MUST be the link-local address assigned to the > interface from which this message is sent.

Re: Fan Speed - Supermicro

At 19:11, Andy Lemin wrote: > but we cannot figure out how to control the fan speed at all. Every board in the X9DRW series should have a BMC with IPMI, and this is what controls your fans and other sensors. Plug in the management port (but not to a public or hostile network!) and if these settin

Re: help

On 17 November 2016 at 11:25, steve kolars wrote: > The 4 lines in between the comments are straight out of several documents, > but when I run "pfctl -nf f-n" these lines are flaged as syntax errors. Any > assistance would be appreciated. “proto tcp” needs to go after the “on [interface]” parame

route(8): default and ::/0

route(8) says: > The route is assumed to be to a network if any of > the following apply to destination: > > • it is the word "default", equivalent to 0/0 Consistent with this, you can substitute "0/0" for "default": > # netstat -rnf inet | grep default > default192.0.2.1

getentropy(2) and random(4) at boot

The random(4) device on FreeBSD will block until the generator is seeded [0], but not after, unless kern.random.sys.seeded is changed. Is this the case for getentropy(2) or random(4) on OpenBSD, and if not, would it be a good idea to make it do so? [0] https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ra

Re: piping stderr to tee log (so I can have my log and watch it, too)

Put the commands that are to be logged in a grouping command, and then apply 2>&1 to that grouping command: { cd ../compile/GENERIC.MP && \ make clean && make && make install; } \ 2>&1 | tee /var/log/build/buildsys.log Note that grouping commands that use braces (i.e. those that execute their

Re: OpenBSD, software and hardware all free

Do not feed the troll.

Re: letsencrypt && https && openbsd.org = https://www.openbsd.org/

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On a low traffic site it already annoys me that I have to change it > once per year with startSSL. This is what the tooling provided by Let's Encrypt is designed to solve. It shouldn't be hard to issue new certificates, and for many applica

Re: letsencrypt && https && openbsd.org = https://www.openbsd.org/

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > once you give in to https once, you're hooked You're only hooked if you use HSTS. > and have to keep paying someone every year, There are at least three CAs that provide free certificates, and one of those is Let's Encrypt. > and

Re: letsencrypt && https && openbsd.org = https://www.openbsd.org/

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Nick Holland wrote: > HAHAHHAHAHA... > you think adding a certificate changes this? > https is a joke. "Some people implement HTTPS poorly sometimes, so we shouldn't try." The amount of effort "wasted" on Let's Encrypting the OpenBSD website is so small compared

Re: Because Theo and various users told them that the projects GnoBSD and Comixwall were worthless and that they weren't contributing to OpenBSD?

You only need a great deal of memory if you wish to use deduplication, which is an optional ZFS feature that some people consider worth the cost. While the complexity and licensing of ZFS make it inappropriate for inclusion in OpenBSD, at least in the near future, let's not throw around insults as

Re: Configure SLAAC and DHCPv6-PD in /etc/hostname.em0

According to hostname.if(5), you can write a line in /etc/hostname.em0 containing exactly "rtsol" without the quotes to initiate SLAAC. Please note that SLAAC on a host with IPv6 forwarding turned on will not work until OpenBSD 5.8 as per : > With a per interfa

Re: OpenBSD parts in Toyota Highlander

Care to post an external link to the image? This list uses demime.

Re: Making IPv6 NAT prefer privacy address

For the record, some ISPs offer both dynamic and static IPv6 subnets to their clients, like Internode, which uses router advertisements for dynamic subnets, and DHCPv6 IA_PD for static subnets.

Re: Sending patches to tech

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Michael McConville wrote: > * Patches are sometimes accepted without response. Be sure to check >that they weren't committed silently. Thanks for the hints, and this one especially. You were right, one of them was actually committed, and while the other one s

Sending patches to tech

(Please forgive me if this is something stupid or regularly asked) I've sent two patches to tech@ so far, one in May, and one in August. Neither of them have seen any replies, which is fair enough, as they're both fairly minor and everyone has a finite amount of time to carve up. That said, it'd

Re: athn crash

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 06:14:00PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 01:37:00PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > This might prevent the crash. I have no idea if it will give you > > a working device though. This part of the PCIe config process only > > seems to affect power m

Re: fatal page fault with atheros ar9300

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 01:58:52PM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Delan Azabani wrote: > > I have more information, hopefully useful, about this problem. To recap, > > the installer bsd.rd fails to boot unless I 'disable athn' in UKC. Th

Re: fatal page fault with atheros ar9300

I have more information, hopefully useful, about this problem. To recap, the installer bsd.rd fails to boot unless I 'disable athn' in UKC. The installer bsd boots, but of course panics because there is no rootfs. I managed to install OpenBSD using bsd.rd (with athn disabled), but upon booting into

Re: fatal page fault with atheros ar9300

Well, I have made an interesting discovery. I gave the 'bsd' kernel a spin instead of 'bsd.rd', and I got a panic. However, the panic was for not finding a rootfs: panic: root device (230c0009f2e600f0) not found Stopped at Debugger+0x5: leave RUN AT LEAST 'trace' AND 'ps' AND INCLUDE OUTPUT

Re: fatal page fault with atheros ar9300

On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 09:48:59PM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Delan Azabani wrote: > > Hi, I'm trying OpenBSD for the first time, and have experienced issues > > getting the installer to boot on my netbook. My netbook is a Toshiba > >

fatal page fault with atheros ar9300

Hi, I'm trying OpenBSD for the first time, and have experienced issues getting the installer to boot on my netbook. My netbook is a Toshiba NB500 (part number PLL50A-00M00D) with an Intel Atom N550 CPU. As it has no CD drive, I used PXE with the following two files: 5.0/amd64/pxeboot 5.0/amd64/bsd