On 10/22/2010 02:09 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
First off, see attachment for an updated version of the spec file for
the portable version tarball.
Apparently attachments are removed. Okay, here's an online copy:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/29966/openbsd/openntpd.spec.txt
--
Florin Andrei
logs? With
ntp.org there are various tools that the user could run to get the
current status. That's a requirement if you want to monitor the time
sync status of your servers via Nagios or something like that.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of t
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Florin Andrei wrote:
Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere?
My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-(
Not a flac or wav, but see http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html
Well, I was hoping to rebuild the
Matthias Pfeifer wrote:
just received my openbsd 4.2 CD set.
And THANKS for this great song.
A kind of funky mixed with good old rock ;)
Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere?
My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-(
--
Florin Andrei
http
and
netblast, please post it. I'm especially interested in generating lots
of small packets, which is difficult.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
Florin Andrei wrote:
##
Huge performance improvements in the network stack, including:
* In pf, store routing table ID, queue ID etc directly in the packet
header mbuf instead of using mbuf tags (which use malloc'd memory). This
yields a 100% improvement in pf perfor
#x27;ll keep testing
with 4.2
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-09 19:34]:
then, an i386 kernel should perform considerably better than amd64 for
firewalling/routing/...
That is surprising. What is the reason?
we dunno really. it hasn't been benched in sometimesoit might not ev
needs to be integrated in
an environment with dynamic routing, it will need to run some kind of
dynamic routing daemon(s). For that, I'd like to have at least two cores
on the system, and a kernel that can take advantage of them.
If the SMP kernel does not actually hurt performance, I migh
whats the Mainbords bios rev?
Tyan Transport GT24-B3992
BIOS Date: 03/06/07 09:36:13 Ver: 08.00.11
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0:
spkr0 at pcppi0
dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
Florin Andrei wrote:
I expected OpenBSD 4.1 to do better. But the thing is, even without the
UDP flood, the OpenBSD firewall is very slow. I am downloading a huge
file through it, via HTTP, and all I get is 4 Mbyte / sec. With Linux I
get 112 Mbyte / sec.
Something's wrong. Or I
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/10/04 17:48, Florin Andrei wrote:
All firewall rules are written as stateless as possible - I don't need
stateful filtering, the setup is very simple (allow HTTP inbound, allow a
few ICMP types, and that's it).
congestion
hard limit 1000
table-entries hard limit 10
OS FINGERPRINTS:
696 fingerprints loaded
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
I'm building several firewalls that need to be able to sustain 1000
Mbit throughput. We're using AMD64 processors a lot, so that's the
kind of architecture I'm looking at right now. I will use OpenBSD 4.1
64 bit version.
The
ready for production)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
pecially the network cards and motherboards?
Anything that I should avoid - hardware known to have issues with this
kind of requirements?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
18 matches
Mail list logo