On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 7:42 AM Joel Knight wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I'm looking for guidance on how to troubleshoot a piece of software
> which is spinning after calling fork(2).
Hi. I've been digging into this more and think I've found a bug in the
threading code.
Consider:
- Pr
Hi.
I'm looking for guidance on how to troubleshoot a piece of software
which is spinning after calling fork(2).
I'm working on making the s2n-tls[1] library build on OpenBSD[2]. One
of the unit tests[3] does this:
1. The test framework forks the test (s2n_fork_generation_number_test)
2. The
I'll just add that I was testing this with the 5.3 release so it doesn't
appear to be related to the recent pki changes.
.joel
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Mikolaj Kucharski
miko...@kucharski.namewrote:
Joel Knight had similar problem in the past and he gave me a clue that
the problem
--- Quoting Camiel Dobbelaar on 2008/04/02 at 17:32 +0200:
Michael Hoffrath wrote:
Same problem here Running OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375 i386.
It seems not only being a problem of Microsoft, I've found that problem also
on VSFTPd (centos) and Filezilla (Windows 2003 Server).
Both
--- Quoting NetOne - Doichin Dokov on 2007/10/26 at 21:08 +0300:
Hi all!
I think there's a mistake in the PF FAQ, but before submitting it as a
bug, would like to make sure it's not me who is wrong, though last night
i helped a guy in #pf who had a problem with this and who did confirm i
--- Quoting HDC on 2007/08/02 at 20:26 -0300:
Read this...
http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/doc/raidadmin/http://www.packetmischief
.ca/openbsd/
I used to use raidframe and followed the procedures in that doc for
doing so, but now there's no point. If the system requires any type of
--- Quoting Doros Eracledes on 2007/07/19 at 10:42 +0100:
I have a proliant DL360-G5 and loaded 4.1-stable on it, all hardware is
detected fine.
I want see if I can get the raid controller status with bioctl.
Controller initially came with firmware 1.20 so I upgraded it to the
latest
--- Quoting RW on 2007/04/30 at 16:52 +1000:
Existing setup:
Head Office:
WAN IP=165.x.y.z
LAN = 172.22.22.0/24
Extranet gateway = 10.x.y.1
Branch Office:
WAN IP=150.x.y.z
LAN= 172.22.23.0/24
IPsec endpoints are OpenBSD firewalls and LAN to LAN connectivity is
fine.
My
--- Quoting Gilles Chehade on 2007/04/18 at 22:23 +0200:
Hi misc@,
I am trying to setup a set of carp-ed firewalls as follow:
ISP 1 ISP 2
| |
\ /
_ SWITCH # 1 _
--- Quoting Boris Golberg on 2007/04/13 at 08:07 -0500:
Hello Kalle,
BM Two logical drives. Not sure about the firmware version, but the
BM more than one logical drive issue is in the caveats section of
BM ciss(4).
I've asked about that caveat in ciss recently, but no one really
--- Quoting Boris Golberg on 2007/03/22 at 19:12 -0500:
Hello guys,
We are looking to buy an HP ProLiant DL320s server with about 5-8
terabyte of storage and Smart Array P400 or P800 for a backup purposes.
According to
--- Quoting Dag Richards on 2007/03/12 at 18:50 -0700:
Two systems running 4.0 GENERIC#1107 i386 on bge drivers.
They are being used as vpn servers
They are each jacked to their own cisco 2950. The switches are connected
with to each other xover cables. Each host can see the others carp
--- Quoting Mike Erdely on 2007/02/11 at 02:46 -0500:
I was going through the FAQ testing my CARP set up and tried ifconfig
carp1 down. The backup promoted itself to master ONLY for carp1 even
though I have net.inet.carp.preempt=1.
But, ifconfig em1 down DOES cause the backup firewall to
--- Quoting Christopher Snell on 2006/12/18 at 22:38 -0700:
On 12/15/06, Brian A. Seklecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts? Strategies? Ideas?
---
Ask the machine directly? Ask an adjacent machine?
Joel Knight just released an updated OpenBSD SNMP MIB that supports
reading data from
--- Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2006/12/09 at 16:36 -0500:
I'm in the process of evaluating whether to transition from a DSL line
over to a cable modem, and until February I'll have both hooked up to
my OpenBSD 3.8 box, which acts as a mail/web/NAT server.
I've got the new cable modem
--- Quoting Uwe Dippel on 2006/11/19 at 10:11 +0800:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:07:57 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On second thought, are you certain pflogd *should* be listening on bpf0?
No; but it never did before (despite of the reboots) and I didn't make it
to do so.
pflogd uses the
--- Quoting Sylvain Coutant on 2006/01/18 at 12:41 +0100:
Hi list,
We have problems grabbing statistics through snmp on our amd64 config. Using
netsnmp and scripts that work on many other systems (OpenBSD 3.8 i386, Ubuntu
Linux amd64, Debian Sarge i386) we are unable to get the CPU usage
--- Quoting Jason Dixon on 2006/01/03 at 17:08 -0500:
I'm testing a new VPN tunnel using ipsecadm and manual keying.
Everything looks ok, but packets aren't making it to enc0 and beyond
on the remote side (either way). I can watch the packet count
increment on the relevant pass rules
--- Quoting Jason Dixon on 2006/01/03 at 19:39 -0500:
Yes, although that's more of a part B problem when we're still
discussing part A. The packets aren't even making it as far as
enc0, so there certainly won't be anything to return yet.
In your original email you say that [packets are]
--- Quoting Jason Dixon on 2006/01/03 at 21:11 -0500:
The original post says that packets aren't making it to enc0 and
beyond on the remote side. Yes, I admit that I was a bit
contradictory in the next sentence that says it's making it all the
way up to remote enc0, but I was trying to
20 matches
Mail list logo
