Hi,
sorry for the late response, the mail just got marked as junk :(
KM> enabling acpi
How exactly do you do it?
Mine acpi-related lines are
its already in the default kernel, not sure if its enabled by default.
# config -ef /bsd.mp
...
ukc> enable acpi
414 acpi0 enabled
KM> enabling
We use this filters like this
match to $provider1Main set metric low
match to $provider1Backup set metric middle
match to $provider2Main set metric high
cheers Kai
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 01:20:26PM +0100, Florian Fuessl wrote:
Hi Gregory,
we have multiple redundant FE upstream peerings
Hi,
We run quite fine here with 4.2-current from today on a DL320G5, after:
enabling write cache in the HP Bios !
enabling amd64 bsd.mp
enabling acpi
enabling write cache for wd0 in the system with:
# atactl wd0 writecacheenable
Before we had horrible 2MByte write speed, now we have 67MByte.
Does this also apply to amd64 ?
Thanks Kai
Hello all,
I just wanted to know if the network cards :
- - intel pro/1000 PT quad port
Works fine here with 4.1 :)
- - intel pro/1000 PF (SX) quad port
are surported by 4.1
I can found the 1000MT or 1000MF on the hardware page, but they are
"on
Hi,
Is sasyncd running reliable on isakmpd in Initiator mode (any special
settings, like timeouts etc) ?
Is sasyncd running reliable on isakmpd in Responder mode? (any special
settings, like timeouts etc) ?
Is isakmpd supposed to run 100% clean (no SA problems/tunnel timeouts)
with sasyncd
Hi,
can you run a tcpdump on your physical interface an see if you receive
carp advertisements from the other box in the form of
09:53:25.278656 CARPv2-advertise 36: vhid=42 advbase=1 advskew=1
demote=0 (DF) [tos 0x10]
and/or do you have firewalling which might block the carp traffic?
Best
We are running productive already, hence an update to -current is too
good at the moment. Please let me know if it brings some enhancements. I
will setup another test scenario then.
cheers Kai
On Thu, Jan 18 2007 at 14:16, Kai Mosebach wrote:
we are using 3 Soekris firewall pairs in our
Hi guys,
we are using 3 Soekris firewall pairs in our companies setup to provide
failover IPSec connections between 3 sites using OpenBSD 4.0 RELEASE.
The big picture looks like this :
A -> B (passive)
A -> C (passive)
B -> C (passive)
By now its basically working fine, but with the IPSec fa
8 matches
Mail list logo