);
}
void
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:09:58 +0200
Manuel Guesdon ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote:
| On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:00:26 +0200
| Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote:
|
| | On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:19:53PM +0200, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
| | Hi,
| |
| | After checking cvs tree, it seems
--
__
Manuel Guesdon - OXYMIUM
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:00:26 +0200
Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote:
| On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:19:53PM +0200, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
| Hi,
|
| After checking cvs tree, it seems that ospf6d isn't following changes done
in
| ospfd.
|
| Is someone working on updating ospf6d
with
#ifdef mecanism for good reasons. After 5 years of evolution, does these
reasons still appear beoing valid (I just ask, I haven't sufficient knowledge
to give an answer).
Manuel
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 17:14:42 +0200
Manuel Guesdon ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote:
| Hi,
|
| When an ospf route
Hi,
When an ospf route already exists, ospf6d doesn't update the nexthop.
I have 6 routers (4 with openbsd 5.0, 2 with openbsd 4.9) running ospfd,
ospf6d and bgpd, routeur id is on lo1.
For some reason (see at end for a way to reproduce it), one of the router
(openbsd 5.0 one) have multiple ospf
Hi,
I've made some tests on ldpd and found some problems/strange things with the
following configuration:
2 hosts (v 5.0)
- core3 (loopback 10.0.0.7)
- core1 (loopback 10.0.0.9)
2 links between these 2 hosts:
- vlan211 (on em9)
core3 IP: 10.0.0.125
core1 IP: 10.0.0.126
- vlan212
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 22:09:51 +0900
Ryan McBride mcbr...@openbsd.org wrote:
| On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:40:10PM +0100, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
| systat -s 2 vmstat:
|
| 3.2%Int 0.1%Sys 0.0%Usr 0.0%Nic 96.8%Idle
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:53:30 +0900
Ryan McBride mcbr...@openbsd.org wrote:
| On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:52:54PM +0100, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
| | I think we already mentioned it that you will always see Ierr. The
| | question is if the box is able to forward more then 150kpps.
|
| Yes that's
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 00:51:46 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
| On 2011-02-28, Manuel Guesdon ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote:
| http://www.oxymium.net/tmp/core3-dmesg
|
| ipmi0 at mainbus0: version 2.0 interface KCS iobase 0xca2/2 spacing 1
|
| ipmi is disabled
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:12:09 +0100
Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote:
| On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:11:13AM +0100, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
| On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 00:51:46 + (UTC)
| Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
|
| | On 2011-02-28, Manuel Guesdon ml+openbsd.m
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:52:03 +0900
Ryan McBride mcbr...@openbsd.org wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:49:01PM +0100, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
| OK. Anyway NIC buffers restrict buffered packets number. But the problem
| remain: why a (for exemple) dual Xeon E5520@2.27GHz with Intel PRO/1000
): I've added it to try
to debug this problem.
core3 run ospf (v4 v6) and bgpd with 13 peers and around 344000
routes (3 peers feed 344000 route each). The problem was here before
we run ospf6d.
Manuel
--
__
Manuel Guesdon
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:03:22 -0700 (MST)
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
| We've got same problems (on a routeur, not a firewall). Increasing
| MAX_INTS_PER_SEC to 24000 increased bandwith and lowered packet loss.
| Our cards are Intel PRO/1000 (82576) and Intel PRO/1000 FP
|
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:29:01 +0900
Ryan McBride mcbr...@openbsd.org wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:49:01PM +0100, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
| OK. Anyway NIC buffers restrict buffered packets number. But the problem
| remain: why a (for exemple) dual Xeon E5520@2.27GHz with Intel PRO/1000
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:41:20 +0900
Ryan McBride mcbr...@openbsd.org wrote:
..
| The output of `systat mbufs` is worth looking at, in particular the
| figure for LIVELOCKS, and the LWM/CWM figures for the interface(s) in
| question.
|
| If the livelocks value is very high, and the LWM/CWM
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:52:21 +0100
Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
| Le Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:13:48 +0100,
| Manuel Guesdon ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net a icrit :
|
| Hello,
|
| We've got same problems (on a routeur, not a firewall). Increasing
| MAX_INTS_PER_SEC to 24000
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:09:32 +0100
Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
| I'm using two ethernet cards Intel 1000/PRO quad ports (gigabit) on a
| firewall (one fiber and one copper).
|
| The problem is that we don't get more than ~320 Mbits/s of bandwith
| beetween the internal
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:36:01 + (GMT)
a b rclo...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
| Awsome !
|
| Thanks Manuel.
|
| Think I'll hold out for it to become an errata patch rather than applying
the
| interim one.
|
| I've also got an issue with BGPD not complying with announce all when
talking
| to an
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:50:52 + (GMT)
a b rclo...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
| I've got a curious issue.
|
...
| The loopback and vlan interfaces get added to the RIB without
| problem.
|
| bnx1 does not get added to the RIB unless I remove the {passive}
| statement, in
| which case everything
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:04:22 +0100
Jan Johansson janj+open...@wenf.org wrote:
...
| I am now trying to replicate this setup for IPv6 using
| ospf6d but it seems that it will only announce addresses on
| active interfaces.
FYI, having the same problem (on passive emX; I haven't tried on carp),
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:21:59 +0800
Patrick Coleman blin...@gmail.com wrote:
| On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Manuel Guesdon
| ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:04:22 +0100
| Jan Johansson janj+open...@wenf.org wrote:
| ...
| | I am now trying to replicate
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:38:55 +0100
Manuel Guesdon ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote:
| Is there a way to get detailed em(4) device errors without having to
| recompile kernel with EM_DEBUG ?
| I try to find in-errors reason(s) but netstat only gives errors as a sum of
| dropped_pkts
Hi,
Is there a way to get detailed em(4) device errors without having to
recompile kernel with EM_DEBUG ?
I try to find in-errors reason(s) but netstat only gives errors as a sum of
dropped_pkts + stats.rxerrc + stats.crcerrs + sc-stats.algnerrc +... as far
as I can see :-(
Manuel
Hi,
I have some problem with a redistributed static route not added to
the routing table.
On a routeur A, there is a static route:
route add -net a.b.c.d/27 e.f.g.h
(e.f.g.h is a carp IP on this router)
route get a.b.c.d show the good gateway (e.f.g.h)
ospfd.conf for this router have
with bmc ?
Manuel
--
__
Manuel Guesdon - OXYMIUM
25 matches
Mail list logo
