On 08.04.19 06:25, David Gwynne wrote:
> OK. I made a start on this. Have a look for "sfp module info and diagnostics"
> on tech@, or click on https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=155469738013008&w=2
>
> We don't have an em(4) here with optics, but a diff doesn't look too bad if
> you're willing
On 05.04.19 02:54, David Gwynne wrote:
> you have em(4) with sfp?
yepp, e.g. in the following appliances :
http://www.lannerinc.com/network-appliances/x86-rackmount-network-appliances/?option=com_content&view=article&id=1683:nca-4210&catid=25:rackmount
There are 2 SFP slots onboard and we are
I second that +1 for ix, but em would also be nice ;-)
On 03.04.19 00:40, Tom Smyth wrote:
> +1 for me also :) ix :)
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 23:38, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> :-)
>>
>> A standard OpenBSD installation is somewhat susceptible to power failures
>> though. Especially fail/back/fail again during the startup procedure while
>> it's relinking libraries in random order. Not saying it can't be used but
>> some thought is needed if you know that it's *likely* to be po
Re,
On 14.01.19 18:40, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> We accept reasonable bug reports from systems with a few changes. You do NOT
> have
> a few changes, you have a huge pile of them, and therefore you are
> 'responsible
> for all the pieces'.
...
> Almost assuredly you are being burned by your own ch
Am 14. Januar 2019 16:40:48 MEZ schrieb Theo de Raadt :
>It sure looks like you have a pile of your own changes which are highly
>unconventional,
>and you are very far away from a stock OpenBSD configuration.
Well, that's right so far, because I have decided to use the tool resflash to
create
Just a small follow-up to my previous email:
I've just had a look at the hardware, that causes the problem before
I've exchanged it with the new one, that now also produce the problem.
This server seems to have the same hardware-setup then the server1, I
mentioned the email before, which is not f
Hi Stuart,
thanks for having a look at this.
> Is it the same or different hardware type and BIOS version for the
> working and hanging machines? (maybe diff the two dmesgs)
>
> Same or different filesystem mount options? (Are you using softdep?)
it's (nearly) the same hardware.
But thanks to
Hi all @misc,
1st things 1st : sorry for my long description, but :
after upgrading from 6.3-stable to 6.4-stable (and later also current)
in our integration stage, I've met a strange problem.
I run OpenBSD in a hub-and-spoke vpn architecture in round about 14
distributed datacenters.
6.3-stabl
Re,
just for the records and to stop anyone wasting time into this issue:
It looks like it's woking now, when I use pair-interfaces to connect the
two bridges and use one pair as parent-interface for a new
vlan-interface with the same vlan-id.
---cut---
# ifconfig bridge
bridge0: flags=41
Hi,
I've got a question concerning the usage of tagged and untagged traffic
with two bridges.
Maybe there's a better way to reach that goal, but I need to connect
e.g. switches to my OpenBSD server over a so called trunk-port (all
traffic should be tagged witch vlan-id 123 for example)
This work
Re,
well as mentioned fstat didn't show any open filehandles or inodes, but
fsck was a bit more chatty :
# fsck /dev/sd0a
** /dev/rsd0a (NO WRITE)
** Last Mounted on /flash
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
** Phase 4 - Check Refere
No, there are no links and process that have the files opened.
Or better : I do not see any with fstat.
Maybe there's any other programs for this purpose I do not know at the
moment ?
Am 27. September 2016 08:29:06 MESZ, schrieb Raul Miller
:
Do any processes have those files open? Did you
Hi all,
I met an interesting problem while deleting files that makes me curious.
After deleting two files for preparing an update in a flashrd-setup
(openbsd.vnd + bsd) I would have expected the ~1,2 GB beeing freed.
The files are gone - so far so good, but the disc space is not free.
I know th
Hi,
I just wanted to keep you in loop concerning my "8 Port Module" problem.
To make a long story short:
One jumper on the motherboard did fix the issue \o/
I've just changed :
two x8 signals
into
one x8, two x4 signals
with the PCIe slot and tadaa all interfaces are present.
So, sor
6 um 22:20 schrieb Chris Cappuccio:
>> Marco Prause [marco-obsdm...@prause.eu] wrote:
>>
>>> em1: flags=18802 mtu 1500
>>> lladdr 00:90:0b:4b:54:0f
>>> priority: 0
>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
>>> status: no car
Concerning my chipset problem, I'm compiling current at the moment,
because the msi-x feature sounds very promising in this case.
Cheers,
Marco
Am 24.07.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Chris Cappuccio:
> Marco Prause [marco-obsdm...@prause.eu] wrote:
>
>> em1: flags=18802 mtu 1500
>
Re,
> So, I've just adjusted my build scripts and jenkins-job and hit the
> build button a few minutes ago to build a 5.9 stable image (yes it's not
> current, but I didn't see any changes in plus.html concerning em
> interfaces or pci stuff, but this will be the next step.
just as a short actua
Hi Nick,
Am 20.07.2016 um 14:08 schrieb Nick Holland:
> On 07/20/16 05:17, Marco Prause wrote:
>> Hi @Misc,
>>
>> I am quite happy to test a 8 Port interface-Card in a 1U Appliance.
>>
>> Unfortunately at the moment I just see 4 of the 8 interfaces - did
>&g
Hi @Misc,
I am quite happy to test a 8 Port interface-Card in a 1U Appliance.
Unfortunately at the moment I just see 4 of the 8 interfaces - did
anybody already have some experience with this NICs and this behavior ?
The spec lists the chipset as :
8 GbE SFP Fiber 2 x Intel I350-AM4
A
Hi Bill,
I don't know, if you saw some lines in the logfile concerning this. But if you
did, maybe youn can use logfmon or something like this for alerting ?
Marco
Am 30. Juni 2016 20:30:25 MESZ, schrieb Bill Buhler :
>Hi,
>
>
>
>I've been through the man pages a couple of times and am not see
ithout any testing on UDP or different datagram payloads and so forth.
All on OpenBSD flashrd 5.5 build on stable (2014-04-05).
Regards,
Marco
Am 21.01.2015 um 18:01 schrieb Christian Weisgerber:
> On 2015-01-21, Marco Prause wrote:
>
>> Also when using ipsec in this test-setup,
Hi Alan,
some time ago I've had a look at them.
Supermicro still seem to have 1U Twin-Server in their List.
Unfortunately I can't say anything about running them - they are still
on my "wishlist".
On the other hand - does anybody know alternatives ? Just in case of not
ending up in some kind of
Happy new year everyone,
Am 16.09.2014 um 00:55 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> On 2014-09-15, Marco Prause wrote:
>> Looking at lib/libc/net/res_query.c
>
> Try libc/asr/res_query.c ..
>
thanks again, Stuart, for this hint.
Just a short follow-up to this thread :
I've re
Am 19.09.2014 um 12:28 schrieb Krzysztof Strzeszewski:
...
> I want add my global domain in my serwer dns unbound... How to do? I
> don't add local domain:
>
> local-data: "example.com 10800 IN A local_IP"
>
> but I want add mu global domain end record A for public_IP in global
> network.
>
> I
Am 16.09.2014 um 00:55 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> On 2014-09-15, Marco Prause wrote:
>> Looking at lib/libc/net/res_query.c
>
> Try libc/asr/res_query.c ..
Thanks for the hint - I'd have a look at, but sadly it doesn't help me
understanding, what's going on.
Am 15.09.2014 um 15:58 schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:59:46 +0200
> Marco Prause wrote:
>
>> Does anyone already met some familiar issue and maybe have some
>> workarounds ? Or can anyone verify / falsify my libc-theory ?
>
> I'd look into whethe
Hi,
while playing around with DANE-enabled postfix, I've been running in
some problems (maybe) concerning with postfix's usage of libc / res_query.c
At the moment it seems to me, libc (or something around) is cutting off
the necessary DO-Bit in the dns-queries.
While asking the local dnssec-awar
28 matches
Mail list logo
