This is suboptimal with respect to performance, but "correctly work-around"
the problem, that is, bpf against an bridge'ed interface receives duplicate
frames. (It happens for not only broadcast but also unicast.)
diff --git a/sys/net/if.c b/sys/net/if.c
index 9b53bf1..5209281 100644
--- a/sys/ne
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 12:50:04PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 06/06/16(Mon) 16:23, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:50:49AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 06/06/16(Mon) 13:04, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > > > Broadcast frame, com
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:50:49AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 06/06/16(Mon) 13:04, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > Broadcast frame, coming into a bridge'ed interface, passes if_input() 3
> > times,
> > and actually input (ether_input()) twice.
> >
> > -
.
I'm wondering if bridge_ifinput() just before bridgeintr_frame() in
bridge_process() is superfluous.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 01:04:06PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> Broadcast frame, coming into a bridge'ed interface, passes if_input() 3 times,
> and actually input (ether_input())
rking.
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:29:50PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> Moving bpf_mtap_ether() from if_input() to (the top of) ether_input() makes
> PPPoE session successfully get established.
>
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:25:39PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > I spoke too
Moving bpf_mtap_ether() from if_input() to (the top of) ether_input() makes
PPPoE session successfully get established.
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:25:39PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> I spoke too early; I thought frames were broken but actually it was not.
> What was happening, accord
pair(4)'s doesn't flood
frames.
bridge(4) and bpf(4) interacting badly?
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:34:10AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> I'm playing with PPPoE and it (npppd(8) + oe(4)) works fine with patched
> pair(4) interfaces, that's good.
>
>
I'm playing with PPPoE and it (npppd(8) + oe(4)) works fine with patched
pair(4) interfaces, that's good.
patch
pair0 --- pair1
pppoe npppd
To try more wierd things, I added one pair(4), to which npppd(8) was listening
on, to a bridge(4). This stops pppoe(4) from working. See
I'm looking at x86 boot loaders, which consume 100% CPU at console (BIOS
PC console), when running on hypervisors. Users usually boot kernel as
soon as a boot loader is loaded. But when something wrong happens and
boot loader prompt is entered, and if its console driver busily polls
console, the
Filed a bug report: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=143554782402152&w=2
Just for reference.
(Next time I buy a new machine I'll go directly to sendbug(1).)
o Use the latest OpenBSD/amd64 and devel/valgrind (valgrind-3.10.1p5).
o Dynamically link your target program.
o Valgrind overrides some functions (alloc, free, string, memory) in
libc using $LD_PRELOAD.
o Embed symbols (cc -g).
o Otherwise Valgrind reports problems using symbols.
This is
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:19:02AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:40:42AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:33:50PM +0200, David Dahlberg wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Am 27.06.2015 um 05:37 schrieb M
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:40:42AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:33:50PM +0200, David Dahlberg wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Am 27.06.2015 um 05:37 schrieb Masao Uebayashi :
> > >
> > > - ZZZ
> > > - Disabling TPM doesn
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:33:50PM +0200, David Dahlberg wrote:
>
>
> > Am 27.06.2015 um 05:37 schrieb Masao Uebayashi :
> >
> > - ZZZ
> > - Disabling TPM doesn't help hibernation.
> > - I tried disabling various devices (iwm, em, xhci, ehci,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:45:01AM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:37:23PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > - zzz
> > - I can almost resume it from RAM with "Security Chip" ("TPM") disabled
> > in the BIOS setting. Exce
- zzz
- I can almost resume it from RAM with "Security Chip" ("TPM") disabled
in the BIOS setting. Except display remains off. With TPM enabled,
I couldn't power on the machine after suspend to RAM.
- ZZZ
- Disabling TPM doesn't help hibernation.
- I tried disabling various devices
> does OpenBSD support PowerPC 603e processors? If it does, I would like
> to try to put in on my EDmini box. Are there any resources about
> running OpenBSD on embedded systems?
MPC5200 has a special DMA engine which needs a custom code, which may
reside in firmware (like EFIKA), or may be em
The timetable of AsiaBSDCon 2007 has been published.
http://asiabsdcon.org/timetable.html
AsiaBSDCon 2007, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
8 - 11 March, 2007
http://asiabsdcon.org/
AsiaBSDCon is a conference for users and developers on BSD based systems.
The conference is for anyone
18 matches
Mail list logo
