Hi Richard,
Richard P. Koett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm coming in rather late on this discussion - just curious about the
> formatting step? Presumably you would do something like:
>
> $ fdformat fd0
Yes exactly, but the low level formatting was not the question.
But thanks for answerin
Hi Jonathan,
I finally found a satisfactory answer from the sources. See below.
Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> c is always the whole disk and because the
> disk has no disklabel and no partition table, it's also a.
Well, the floppy _does_ have a disklabel. By default, it only
Hi,
I have encountered a problem remounting a memory file system (mfs)
read-only. When create a mfs with, say
# mount_mfs -s 16384 swap /mfs
then I get the following output by mount:
mfs:9556 on /mfs type mfs (asynchronous, local, size=16384 512-blocks)
where the number 9556 is the proce
Hi Helio,
since I do not have the full information on network setup/routing,
I can only do a guess:
Try making your rules for traffic between the GATEWAYs on ext_if
and the rules for traffic between the NETWORKs in tun0
stateful (keep state).
Michael
these:
Helio Santana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi JCR,
J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I can tell, you basically asked for the "right or preferred
> way" "of putting a filesystem onto a floppy"
Yes, that is exactly my question.
> The best answer I know is fdformat. It works. It's simple and it's the
> most commonly accept
Spruell, Darren-Perot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any reason to use FFS on a floppy? Won't FAT (-12, or whatever)
> work fine? Could you just mformat it and be along?
Yes, in fact there are:
1. As a matter of principle.
2. I need the FFS file permissions and ownerships on the floppy.
Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > which is the right or preferred way to do so (since there are, as
> > I pointed out several possible ways).
>
> I already answered that before:
> Jonathan Schleifer <
Hi,
On 8/23/05, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:58:47 +0200, Michael Adam
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >[...]
> >First of all, a floppy needs to be low level formatted, which can be
> >achieved by the fdformat pr
Hi Steve,
On 8/23/05, STeve Andre' wrote:
>
> I would avoid all this and use the 'mtools' package instead. It deals
> with msdos fat-12(?) floppies, and is tons easier to use. Then you
> can hand those floppies to others and they can read/write them.
Using fat on the floppy is not an option. I
Hi,
I could not tell from the documentation which is the proper way
to setup and use floppy disks on the i386 architecture, i.e. which
is the right partition to use.
I am talking about the standard 3.5 inch 1.44 MB floppy disks.
There are several possibilities to put a file system onto one:
Firs
On 7/19/05, Roy Morris wrote:
>
> sorry, I must be reading this wrong or not understanding. Why
> would you not just put in a static arp entry? Is there ever a
> time when you don't want traffic to take this route?
No, I want all traffic to take this route. There are several
imaginable solutions:
Hi,
On 7/19/05, Alexander Bochmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That setup is broken by design.
Well yes, but sometimes you don't have all aspects of the
network setup under your control.
> The only real way to make this work is
> to have 192.168.1.2 do proxy-arp for
> 192.168.1.3, which will so
Hi,
I asked this question a week ago but there was no reply,
so I am asking it again somewhat differently. I would
really greatly appreciate any comments on this!
Is it possible to change a cloned link-level host route
(generated by arp requests) into a static gateway host
route?
The scenari
Hi,
I have encountered the (for me) undesired
phenomenon that the "route change" command
does not overwrite the routing flags of a
present route at least for host routes.
This has the effect that I cannot change
a host route created by an arp entry (which
is a LLINFO and clonded route) ino a sta
14 matches
Mail list logo
