Re: ntpd.conf - add ability to read servers from an include file?

, and then create your own, and upgrades / > sysmerge would not touch your file. > > I believe if we do this right, it will prod people towards creating > narrower role-specific configurations for their machines. > having simpler config models, and narrow roles would be a good thing. -Nex6 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

Re: What are the disadvantages of soft updates?

utput error. softdep does not support disks > that don't work, to put it bluntly. The original FFS code can cope > with disk failure by backing out of the operation, but soft updates > reorders things and can't undo what's already been done. > bad multi-path routes, or

Re: What are the disadvantages of soft updates?

se softdep, but i'd say > on file systems where file create/delete performance is *critically* > important, performace has been clearly demonstrated to be insufficient > without softdep, and you consider data loss harmless. > >> Is there a way to prune metadata which will sa

Re: What are the disadvantages of soft updates?

m. I can also attempt to reproduce on -current if you want, but even at its worst it'd stay up for a month or two before crashing. > I noticed, that with Nix machines and ESXi/SAN setups is that nix is not very forgiving to SAN issues. -Nex6 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment

Re: security - "pass the hash" style attacks?

On Nov 3, 2014, at 4:28 AM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > Philip Guenther writes: > >> [apologies for the contentless previous message] >> >> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Nex6|Bill wrote:

Re: security - "pass the hash" style attacks?

On Nov 2, 2014, at 4:30 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Nex6|Bill wrote: >> I know, that “pass the hash” is now getting a lot of playtime on windows. and >> I have heard in a couple of talks >> that its directly related to “SSO” part of the O

Re: OpenBSD 5.6 Released

I see, TCP wrappers has been removed i am assuming using only PF is the practice for stuff people who where using TCP wrappers for… and, thanks for the hard work… -Nex6 On Nov 1, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > November 1, 2014. > > We are pleased to announce the

security - "pass the hash" style attacks?

/etc/passwd table for offline attacks sorts of stuff? Thoughts -Nex6 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

Laptop Support?

I may be changing positions, so may be getting a new laptop. Would like to request one the has good OpenBSD support. What are some models that are well supported? -Nex6

alias's - ksh

Kinda new to OpenBSD, (have a couple of 5.4 installs in VMs); whats the standard for alias's? i added it to the .profile but some googling seems to indicate that that wont work. that you have to export, and do an .kshrc file? so whats the "standard?" -Nex6

laptop support for HP 8540W

anyone know how well an HP8540W is supported?

Gnome and OpenBSD 5.4

/.serverauth does not exist.  any ideas? on what i missed? -Nex6

Re: DNS resolver retries configurable? (or: Anything to make DNS resolves always work!)

lures, a failed lookup which will trigger a retry to the next NS. and a NS handing out a negitive record which then follows the neg TTL for when it will retry. hope this helps -Nex6 > > > 2013/12/20 Matthew Dempsky > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Mikael wrote: