On Sep 25, 2010, at 8:44 PM, Oliver Peter wrote:
> You should have a look at dig(1).
> i.e.
> dig @127.0.0.1 example.com A
Ah, and there's also:
net/ldns/drill
drill is a tool ala dig from BIND. It was designed
with DNSSEC in mind and should be a useful
Hey David,
On Sep 25, 2010, at 11:42 AM, David Walker wrote:
> First off a small oddity (it could be pebkac).
> It appears my named.conf is okay and so are my master files.
> If I do a ...
> nslookup example.com 127.0.0.1
> ... I get a result returned that looks as per normal wth the IP
> address
ozlabs.org/~rusty/index.cgi/tech/2006-08-15.html
Yes, it's one of the better summaries by a Linux person, actually a
quite sane one. But note the date, a lot has happened on the PF side
of the fence since then, not least performance-wise.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of
sd
> speakers will not come to eurobsdcon.
Yes, an unambiguous confirmation is needed. Please supply one with no
further delay.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remembe
Kevin Chadwick writes:
> Can anyone suggest a good setting?
My boxes have been running with -w 1 for a few years, doesn't seem to
scare them off, unfortunately:
pe...@skapet:~$ sudo spamdb | grep -c TRAPPED
23969
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implem
ailable roughly in time for this
release)
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.1
x27;s.
Peter
in the criteria for your match rule. Hard to
be more specific without the full rule set.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network t
on-preserving.
pe...@deeperthought:~$ file /usr/libexec/vi.recover
/usr/libexec/vi.recover: a /usr/bin/perl -w script text executable
Several minutes sounds like a lot, was the last shutdown not a clean one?
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http:/
Device "/dev/wsmouse"
[3820593.843] (**) : Protocol: WSMouse
[3820593.843] (**) Option "CorePointer"
[3820593.843] (**) : always reports core events
[3820593.843] (**) Option "Device" "/dev/wsmouse"
[3820593.865] (==) : Emulate3Buttons, Emulate3Timeout:
50
[3820593.865] (**) : ZAxisMapping: buttons 4 and 5
[3820593.865] (**) : Buttons: 9
[3820593.880] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "" (type: MOUSE)
[3820593.880] (**) : (accel) keeping acceleration
scheme 1
[3820593.880] (**) : (accel) acceleration profile 0
[3820593.880] (**) : (accel) acceleration factor: 2.000
[3820593.880] (**) : (accel) acceleration threshold: 4
[3820593.884] (**) Option "CoreKeyboard"
[3820593.884] (**) : always reports core events
[3820593.884] (**) Option "Protocol" "standard"
[3820593.884] (**) : Protocol: standard
[3820593.884] (--) : using wscons layout us
[3820593.884] (**) Option "XkbRules" "xorg"
[3820593.884] (**) : XkbRules: "xorg"
[3820593.884] (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
[3820593.884] (**) : XkbModel: "pc105"
[3820593.884] (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us"
[3820593.884] (**) : XkbLayout: "us"
[3820593.884] (**) Option "CustomKeycodes" "off"
[3820593.884] (**) : CustomKeycodes disabled
[3820593.884] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "" (type: KEYBOARD)
[3820593.887] PCH FDI RX PLL enable
[3820593.922] PCH FDI TX PLL enable b01a2050
[3820593.922] Pipe enable
[3820593.922] Plane enable
[3820593.962] FDI_RX_IIR 0x100
[3820593.962] FDI train 1 done.
[3820593.982] FDI_RX_IIR 0x600
[3820593.982] FDI train 2 done.
[3820593.982] FDI train done
[3820594.002] FDI TX link normal
[3820594.022] transcoder enable
[3820594.022] LUT load
[3820594.022] DPMS on done
[3820594.237] (II) intel(0): EDID vendor "LEN", prod id 16438
[3820594.237] (II) intel(0): Using EDID range info for horizontal sync
[3820594.237] (II) intel(0): Using EDID range info for vertical refresh
[3820594.237] (II) intel(0): Printing DDC gathered Modelines:
[3820594.237] (II) intel(0): Modeline "1440x900"x0.0 114.06 1440 1488
1520 2044 900 903 909 930 -hsync -vsync (55.8 kHz)
[3820594.237] (II) intel(0): Modeline "1440x900"x0.0 114.06 1440 1488
1520 2204 900 903 909 1035 -hsync -vsync (51.8 kHz)
[3820594.237] (II) intel(0): EDID vendor "LEN", prod id 16438
--
Later
Peter
"Jean-Francois" writes:
> I would like to redirect particular ports on the sub-network, not only on one
> ip adress of the subnetwork.
'on the sub-network' is a little too fuzzy, but if you can populate a
table with your probable target addresses something like
htt
ents is the ports list, they
will be removed from messages on the other mailing lists."
--
Later
Peter
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:47:43PM +0200, Robert wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:42:09 +0200
> "Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
> > Thanks. I'm trying to interpret that marc archive right. Was it that you
> > had your /etc/mailer.conf not updated to the opensmtpd bin
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:00:25PM +0200, Robert wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:19:10 +0200
> "Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
> > It works at home too, with a bit of hackery by myself. A while ago I
> > noticed
> > OpenSMTPD didn't deliver to aliases, but I&#
release so that I can test this and know for sure!
> Meta1, which is viewed by some as a "sendmail made right" is still in
> very deep pre-alpha state... what a pity.
> --
> With best regards,
> Gregory Edigarov
regards,
-peter
with tcpdump output (annotated if need be) and reproducible numbers
and statistics.
(otherwise, we will call it 'flags wanking', nevermind the quick gushers)
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.n
Siju George writes:
> what about qmail? ;-)
huh, hurr, he said qmail
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
> I only want to know what is better (easiest way, most secure) to use.
> And have your advice.
He just gave it to you. sendmail.
> > Why do you think OpenBSD ships with (a custom and secure) sendmail by
> > default?
--
Later
Peter
Actually your right about troubleshooting info, the owner is out of
country and must have vpn access, so I can't hook it up the the
connection right now. I don't' nessecary thinks it's a bug, I really
don't know what the problem is.
Peter
-Original M
ster describes, some not
terribly well thougth out scrub options carried over from an earlier
version), but going to
match in all scrub (no-df max-mss 1440)
made my home network a lot more pleasant.
And yes, the 4.8 snapshots are really worth trying.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of
thinking I've missed something, but everything looks right.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of Bryan Irvine
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:40 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subj
, and see if any reported any big bugs I may try a snapshot
after I back up the present drive. I am at a loss what it is.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Chris Cappuccio [mailto:ch...@nmedia.net]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:28 PM
To: Peter Merritt
Cc: STeve Andre'; misc@openbs
Ok, thanks.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: STeve Andre' [mailto:and...@msu.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 8:18 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Cc: Peter Merritt
Subject: Re: How to Downgrade from 4.7 to 4.6
On Friday 06 August 2010 22:19:24 Peter Merritt wrote:
> Have one co
Have one connection that I just can't get 4.7 to work with even with the
most minimal pf.conf I get erratic and slow results. How would I go
about downgrading from 4.7 to 4.6?
Peter
Thanks all for the help, got some good ideas from the discussion.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of Peter Hessler
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:49 AM
To: Olivier Mehani
Cc
On 2010 Aug 05 (Thu) at 10:42:21 +1000 (+1000), Olivier Mehani wrote:
:=== pf.conf ===
:match out on egress from (ingress:network) to any nat-to (egress)
:pass all
:==
You can simplify this even more:
pass out from !(egress) nat-to (egress:0)
the 'egress' group is added to any interface that
What would be the most barebones pf.conf for a OpenBSD 4.7 nat firewall
with 2 nics, that passes everything.
Peter
now will not pass dns from lan, just a one way
conversation. I have worked for 2 days on still no closer to solving
this.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of Peter Merritt
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 6:43 PM
To: misc
Thanks for the help, does look correct to me.
Peter
re0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:30:18:ad:ed:96
priority: 0
groups: egress
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX
full-duplex,rxpause,txpause)
status: active
side nic. I put in a very
minimal pf.conf and it still works the same. I'm at a loss what is
wrong. pf.conf and dmess follows. Any ideas would be greatly
appreciated.
Peter
Motherboard #1 Jetway 7f4k1G5D-LF 1.5ghz
Motherboard #2 Jetway J7F4 1.2 Ghz
# sysctl net.inet.ip.forwa
depends on the card - multihead usually works but multi card multihead
is broken until a later version of X is added to openbsd (see previous
mails on this list)
I dont know what the ati support is like in X currently but if you
want to run 3 monitors it may work out cheaper to get an ati card wit
Jan Stary writes:
>> Actually a test with up to the second -current would be helpful to get a
>> baseline where we are at with this machine.
>
> What is the "second -current"?
"up to the second" -- as fresh as physically possible
- p
--
Peter N. M.
eb, the BSDA exam will be offered
during the conference.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[2
STeve Andre' [and...@msu.edu] wrote:
> I think that is a fundamentally flawed assumption. Root can do
> *ANYTHING*. Anything at all. Sure, preventing crashes is good,
> but you can't get around the fact that root is omniscient.
>
Had this 'root' been *omniscient*, the incident wouldn't have
ha
There was a fix for this very recently, please update to a snapshot or -current.
On 2010 Jul 24 (Sat) at 12:04:56 -0700 (-0700), Luis Useche wrote:
:HI Guys,
:
:I have a Dell Inspiron 1420 laptop where I am using OpenBSD.
:
:My problem is that the battery status is not updated frequently enough. I
Mateusz Gierblinski writes:
> I'm just wondering. Where are you OpenBSD users from?
Bergen, Norway
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on
riate rdr-to, depending on just
how you handled the conversion of the general case.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic&quo
stems away
from my personal control, where having a system be able to came back up in a
similar situation would be useful.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Philip Guenther [mailto:guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 6:22 PM
To: Peter Bako
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: PTY alloca
27;m using OpenBSD 4.6 as both the host on which I
setup the image and OS on the CF card. The card in question is a 64M
SanDisk CF and is being plugged into a Soekris Net4801 box. None of these
should make a difference, but you never know... :-)
Thanks,
Peter
Aaron Lewis writes:
> ErrorDocument 404 /error.html
> Rediret 302 /error.html http://my.host/
^
missing a 'c' here I think. If this is an actual cut'n'paste from your config,
that's the likely source of yo
desktop. But for this to work I would need a static
> ip or modify the pf rules everytime my public ip changes.
you could use the () notation to compensate for dynamically assigned
addresses, ie
block to ($ext_if)
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implement
You do realize this article is satire, yes?
On 2010 Jul 03 (Sat) at 10:21:00 +0800 (+0800), Brent Shumacher wrote:
:http://www.trollaxor.com/...
:
--
The cost of living is going up, and the chance of living is going down.
This is on my TODO list, but I haven't gotten to it yet.
(Yes, this also annoys me)
On 2010 Jul 01 (Thu) at 10:54:57 +0400 (+0400), czark...@gmail.com wrote:
:Hello!
:
:I have an OpenBSD 4.7 on my netbook.
:
:Right now I've configured my home network in hostname.if as it is the
:one I use most.
case, I've got a Microtek Scanmaker 330 and a Canon Canoscan 300
I can provide dmesgs for if required.
I know USB scanners are cheap, but my existing kit does the job and it's
such
an infrequent requirement I'd rather just boot up an old system.
Peter
Check for the X-Loop header
On 2010 Jun 22 (Tue) at 20:24:12 -0400 (-0400), Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
:Why do the OpenBSD lists have no List-ID header?
:
:With the existing set of headers, it's impossible to filter the mail in gmail
:and other lame mail clients that don't allow arbitrary headers
ey you -current source, so it's no
surprise the patch doesn't apply cleanly. If you want -current, the
best advice is to install a snapshot and take it from there (or just
keep fetching snapshots).
On the other hand, if you want 4.7-stable, check out the 4.7 source
and apply the errata patche
Has anybody gotten the uow* driver to work with the Hobby Boards rain gauge?
Specifically RG1-R1-A
(http://www.hobby-boards.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=22&products_id=8
1). I've gotten my temp boards to read, but I do not have any counter
devices to test with.
Thanks,
Peter
rlier
releases of OpenBSD and VLC but may have improved.
Really, the easiest way is just to try it out! You could always dual boot if
not sure.
Peter
lugin means firefox will crash
slightly less often and you're spared a lot of the less useful ads.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious net
Maybe I'm getting on a bit, but I don't consider swapping operating system
to be the best option in that case. Vista may be a memory hog, but it's
usually easier in the long run to spend cash on 4GB for a laptop, than to
install and faff around with a whole new operating system..
Linux running out
t;{" "}",
were a simple macro expansion, but they are not.
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:08:04PM -0400, Peter Fraser wrote:
> > > I (and I realize I was wrong ) always considered that
> > >
> > > pass quick from { addr 1, addr2 }
> > >
&g
man pf.conf never describes what "!" does. The "!" is used in some examples
and
a lot of the time is obvious what will happens. The pf faq has somewhat more
of
an explanation of "!" with multiple address, but its explanation only refers
to the
use of "!" in tables. There is never any statement
ed?
>>
>>
> Sorry you need to upgrade to 4.7 or restart ospfd. Versions before 4.7
> were easily confused by interface changed. In 4.7 it may be necessary to
> reload the config after certain changes to sync the config with the
> network setup.
>
Oops, do i loose
xx.yy.233.160/28 link#27
link #62 is the new VLAN interface, link #27 is the old VLAN inteface.
What's happening here?
Regards,
Peter
--
Peter Spekreijse
E: pe...@spekreijse.net
T: +31-742672764
M: +31-641922460
xx.yy.233.160/28 link#27
link #62 is the new VLAN interface, link #27 is the old VLAN inteface.
What's happening here? How can this be resolved?
Regards,
Peter
--
Peter Spekreijse
E: pe...@spekreijse.net
T: +31-742672764
M: +31-641922460
From: "Siju George"
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Peter Kay (Syllopsium)
wrote:
From: "Siju George"
but OpenBSD 4.7/amd64 SMP detects only 3 GB.
Is there anything more I should do to get the other 1 GB of RAM
recognized by the System?
This is normal. Large memor
From: "Siju George"
but OpenBSD 4.7/amd64 SMP detects only 3 GB.
Is there anything more I should do to get the other 1 GB of RAM
recognized by the System?
This is normal. Large memory support is not yet included in
OpenBSD by default for amd64.
a
fondness for "open source" rather than "free software" and mentions
"Linux" without "GNU/" prepended too often.
But still the wrong mailing list.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ ht
estrict what you can do, although
it's
good karma to contribute back when using a large amount of free code from
others.
[1] The GPL allows products to be sold, but seeing as this must include
source code, after one sale it only needs someone with a compiler to
distribute
it freely (as in beer).
Peter
I have been modifying my fire rules using the 4.7 syntax.
It would have been really nice if the tcpdump showed the
final address as well as the initial address of the packet
when you are using rdr-to or nat-to
Henning Brauer writes:
> * Peter N. M. Hansteen [2010-05-22 19:08]:
>> a little odd that the pf faq has not been updated
>
> huh? it has been updated, the same day 4.7 has been released
It looks like they missed a spot in the examples at
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/example1.
h. But anyway, the slides from my BSDCan 2010 PF tutorial are
up at
http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/bsdcan2010/
in there should be enough material to get you started with 4.7-style
configs. Yes, I'm planning to refresh the (short&free) full text
version as well plus of course the book (in
Gregory Edigarov writes:
> Where is that 'hardware switch'?
on my SL500 it's a little slider switch on the front, to the left and
down from where you fumble your trackpad
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ ht
it is usually an actual switch on the side of your laptop. It may also
be a special [fn] key, with the picture of a radio, or other icons.
Please consult the user manual for your computer.
On 2010 May 21 (Fri) at 14:53:51 +0300 (+0300), Gregory Edigarov wrote:
:Hi,
:
:Where is that 'hardware swi
ag day release.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20100509
On 2010 May 19 (Wed) at 10:11:02 -0500 (-0500), Chris Bennett wrote:
:I get the following after a fresh checkout
:
:
:make bootstrap
:# make bootstrap
:"Makefile", line 14: Malformed conditional (${COMPILER_VERSION:L:Mgcc[34]*})
:"Makefile", line 14
that matches a particular rule, you could write
rules that match on table membership and manipulate the tables.
Depending on your specific needs, cron or at jobs with pfctl
one-liners could go a long way.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http:/
On 2010 May 12 (Wed) at 21:28:03 +1000 (+1000), Rod Whitworth wrote:
:Particularly seeing I referenced both of those in my original post as
:not being helpful and I've been trying to get somebody - anybody - to
:write a minimal NAT ruleset and show me.
The ruleset I use on my laptop (which sometim
laptops with other
wireless cards in the future unless that particular manufacturer does
the sensible thing.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all m
ther side announces TLS available, but we're certainly
not there yet. It's a lot more useful to keep it simple: set up your
real mail server with TLS and forget about complicating the path to
spamd. After all, it's only the whitelisted hosts that will actually
need a secure connect
pe...@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) writes:
> I would think that would be a fair question to ask the person who told
> you PF is garbage because it is multithreaded:
eh, "because it is *not* multithreaded:"
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implemen
ther iteration of the "OpenBSD is {crap,insecure,written
and used only by dickheads} because it does not have $my_favorite_toy"
nonsense.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"
you increase the chance of
seeing the release out on the net early. And have your boss donate
serious money already.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bi
dev/sd0g on /usr/X11R6 type ffs (local, nodev)
/dev/sd0h on /usr/local type ffs (local, nodev)
/dev/sd0j on /usr/obj type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid)
/dev/sd0i on /usr/src type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid)
/dev/sd0e on /var type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid)
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the fi
sa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pms0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot
wsmouse0 at pms0 mux 0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0:
spkr0 at pcppi0
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
run0 at uhub1 port 3 "Ralink 802.11 n WLAN" rev 2.00/1.01 addr 2
run0: MAC/BBP RT3070 (rev 0x0200), RF RT3020 (MIMO 1T1R), address
00:22:cf:04:06:64
uvideo0 at uhub1 port 5 configuration 1 interface 0 "Image Processor HP
Webcam" rev 2.00/3.04 addr 3
video0 at uvideo0
vscsi0 at root
scsibus1 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
--
Later
Peter
The openbsd-newbies list is now fixed, sorry for the inconvenience.
On 2010 Apr 30 (Fri) at 14:51:55 +0200 (+0200), Peter Hessler wrote:
:Thanks for mentioning it, mailman decided to freak out on me, and I need
:to fix it.
:
:
:On 2010 Apr 30 (Fri) at 07:29:45 -0500 (-0500), Ed Bennett wrote
Thanks for mentioning it, mailman decided to freak out on me, and I need
to fix it.
On 2010 Apr 30 (Fri) at 07:29:45 -0500 (-0500), Ed Bennett wrote:
:Is the newbie list still active? The form doesn't work and I haven't
:recieved a reply from the list webmaster.
:
--
Fie for shame, you lascivio
sourced from files are held in memory, and rule set evaluation
in most cases is not triggered as long as an arriving packet matches a
pre-existing state.
My own take on basic table operations are up at
http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/tables.html, the PF User
Guide (aka The PF FAQ) has a tables sec
the second one in rc.local much like you would for any non-default
daemon, and adjust the pf rules so the traffic hits the relevant proxy
and the back end.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.
from the great unwashed
to your mail server. That does not seem to match the scenario you
describe here, so unless you can get an OpenBSD box with spamd
inserted in the path to the mail server, you'll most likely get more
useful results looking at whatever content filtering is available at
the c
start one. Anyone interested
please contact me off list.
--
Later
Peter
Hi,
rdr on $int_if inet proto tcp from any port www to any port www ->
>
Of course, this will only match, when the client connects over port 80.
They won't do that.
Regards,
p
From: "J.C. Roberts"
The developers *CONSTANTLY* *ASK* *FOR* *YOUR* *HELP* with testing, but
this "dull and heavy" work is somehow below most people who just talk
about wanting to become developers and are looking for shortcuts to
becoming one.
Since validity is critical, if you cannot test prop
From: "Siju George"
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:59 AM, wrote:
Of course I boot using the Vista bootloader and easybcd to edit the
configuration, which saves a lot of headache. The important thing is it
can
be done.
:)
How Do you Tell the OpenBSD Installer to install to a logical partition?
ion anymore, and it's not even showing up in the list when running
usbdevs.
My question is:
Is it possible to reset the USB stick or bus (I think that could fix it) or
is there any other way I can solve this problem
without any manual intervention or rebooting?
Kind regards,
Peter
From: "Brad Tilley"
as appropriate if you're using grub etc or XP..
Another Option. Assuming a i386 or amd64 PC:
1. Put another hard drive into the computer.
2. Go into the BIOS and make the new hard drive have higher priority.
3. Boot the computer and install OpenBSD onto the new hard drive
OpenBSD does not require a primary partition, nor does NetBSD. Solaris does
for the moment,
although code to fix that has been committed.
I have a Windows 7 x64, OpenBSD, Solaris, NetBSD multiboot. It's not that
difficult to arrange.
I did most of the partitioning in Windows, setting up a pri
From: "Henning Brauer"
* Peter [2010-04-15 03:27]:
I know bigmem is still in a state of flux and can be enabled by
editing machdep.c and compiling a custom kernel.
What's the best way to test and report this?
none. bigmem is known broken, otherwise it would be enabled by
def
I know bigmem is still in a state of flux and can be enabled by editing
machdep.c and compiling a custom kernel.
I also realise that it may or may not work on OpenBSD AMD64 due to the
absence of an iommu on non VT-d capable Intel systems, aside from the
AGP/PCI-e GART.
What's the best way to
o try submitting data.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
ool there if you want to. As far as I can tell my
notes from way back (http://www.bsdly.net/~peter/bsdstat/) still apply.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil
wrote:
> > Robert C Wittig wrote (2010-04-13 9:53:03):
> >
> > Peter HEINER wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have a home router with 4.6/i386 installed on a 512 MB CF card.
> > > As both disk space and RAM are scarce, I want to minimize logging
results.
Then again, we've seen time and again that people who expect OpenBSD
users to be thoroughly unpleasant have found ways to get their
expecations fulfilled too. It's even possible some have a special
knack for just that. ;P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implement
gling.
Is there a way to only log successful login attempts via SSH?
Regards,
peter
>> > $ xrandr --output VGA --auto --right-of LVDS
>> > xrandr: screen cannot be larger than 1280x1280 (desired size 2304x1024)
>>
>> You have to set the X virtual screen size before starting X. Then
>> when you attach a monitor, you use xrandr to "carve up" a portion of
>> the virtual screen to s
hing.
xbacklight -set 100
BACKLIGHT: 0 (0x) range: (0,255)
xbacklight -set 50
BACKLIGHT: 0 (0x) range: (0,255)
--
Later
Peter
ing on periodic data where pfctl resets the counters every N
time units after recording (displaying) values - pfctl -vslz if memory
serves.
Just a thought, may or may not be appropriate for your application,
worth mentioning
Cheers,
Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 114
em of /var filling up quickly fit my hazy
memories of one time I put in way to much log (all) in a config. The
difference in space consumption between log and log (all) is rather
significant.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ h
aults pflow) and collect the netflow
data somewhere with enough disk space to slice and dice the data
separately.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on
02.11 n WLAN" rev 2.00/1.01 addr 2
run0: MAC/BBP RT3070 (rev 0x0200), RF RT3020 (MIMO 1T1R), address
00:22:cf:04:06:64
uvideo0 at uhub1 port 5 configuration 1 interface 0 "Image Processor HP
Webcam" rev 2.00/3.04 addr 3
video0 at uvideo0
vscsi0 at root
scsibus1 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
umass0 at uhub1 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "Flash Drive
SK_USB20" rev 2.00/2.00 addr 4
umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only
scsibus2 at umass0: 2 targets, initiator 0
sd1 at scsibus2 targ 1 lun 0: SCSI2
0/direct removable
sd1: 7782MB, 512 bytes/sec, 15937536 sec total
--
Later
Peter
1801 - 1900 of 2909 matches
Mail list logo
