2008/12/12 Aram Havarneanu :
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Scott Francis wrote:
>> in theory, you could install the linux compatibility packages (see
>> compat_linux(8)) and run e.g. VMware Server as a platform for a
>> Windows VM. I haven't tried this myself yet
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Jeff_1981 wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Please can you indicate me how to run Windows or Linux under OpenBSD ?
> Under Linux for example there is possibility to virtualize another OS.
in theory, you could install the linux compatibility packages (see
compat_linux(8)) an
On 8/16/06, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I understand but want to check before I do something silly.
I have OBSD 3.9 + chrooted apache + mod_perl after apxs.
Now, to actually run perl cgi's I have to copy /usr/bin/perl and all
relevant libs over to /var/www?
Is there an aut
On 6/28/06, Ajith Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have two silly questions..
How to see the memoy details of a OpenBSD machine using commands ?
How to see the processor details of a OpenBSD machine using commands ?
[snip ridiculous boilerplate disclaimer]
the canonical answer is dmesg(
On 6/28/06, joakinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings to all,
I'm a programmer and network administrator and want to study the code of
OpenBSD related to TCP/IP & Ethernet to understand networking from inside
and also to see if I can be of any help to the rest of developers.
I'm interested
On 6/28/06, Thomas Bvrnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Has everyone an idea what's the problem.
Is there a way to get a higher throughput with encryption ?
yes. Buy a vpn1411 hardware crypto accelerator for your net4801. In
fact, you could have bought one when you purchased the soekris. I
On 6/26/06, FTP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I was trying to start Apache in SSL mode and I did follow the
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#HTTPS steps. After that I issued "apachectl
startssl" and everything went fine.
Now, when I point to the https:// from my server I get an "unabl
On 6/23/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=mountd
>
> It's definitely possible (Free and Net both offer the -p option).
I think that is completely ridiculous. Hardcoding RPC utilities
to non-random ports to try to tie it to someth
On 6/21/06, Clint Pachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because portmap(8) dynamically assigns the mountd(8) port, how would
one write a pass rule in pf for mountd(8) traffic? My problem is that
every time mountd(8) is re/started, it operates on a different port and
my fixed pf rules block the mount p
On 1/22/06, NetNeanderthal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/22/06, Scott Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > you mean, aside from including man38.tgz? What else are you looking
> > for? There's some docs on their website, but why would you need
> > a
On 1/19/06, NetNeanderthal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I'm less than impressed with it after mounting the iso and viewing the
> contents. Their documentation is poor, if not void of content
> altogether.
you mean, aside from including man38.tgz? What else are you looking
for? There's some
Surprisingly, nobody else has mentioned this on-list yet (perhaps
because it's been all over the news elsewhere):
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=anonym.os&btnG=Search+News
I'm not in the least surprised that OpenBSD was chosen as the base for
a live CD focused on privacy, anonymity and
On 10/8/05, Roelof Wobben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On this moment I have XP on my system.
> Now i want a dual boot XP and Openbsd.
>
> XP has now the first 20 GB of total 40 GB.
> When install Openbsd after XP i get a problem regarding the install
> instructions.
> But when i first i
On 9/5/05, Fletch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greets
>
> I am setting up an openbsd router to manage a companies intenet access,
> and would like to deploy volume based internet usage. I have setup
> squid, but it doesn't seem to have any options to limit a user by volume
> of traffic, only ban
On 8/21/05, Johan P. Lindstrvm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to co-write an installation guide for twiki (it's in
> packages) for us less seasoned obsd monglers, I am finding it
> not-so-straight-forward and would like to help every one else on their
> way, does anyone know whom I may c
On 8/18/05, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > 2. Alot of you seem to use sudo instead of su - when you want to do
> > something that requires privileges. Why is this? What settings are
> > you using for sudo?
>
> Various reasons .. if you use sudo on each command you want to e
On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked to see how the box would behave in terms of performance.
go grab the oldest PC you can find and you'll probably have roughly
equivalent CPU and RAM performance. I hope you're not considering disk
I/O as part of "performance", because Soe
On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to set a obsd and soekris boxes as a server for about 100 users.
> This box is supposed to handle NIS + Kerberos.
>
> Does such configuration can handle the task ? I mean on a performance matter.
> Does anybody have such configurati
On 8/2/05, Michael C. Ibarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just ran into a wall with the scponly option:
>
> "If you do use chroot(), your binary will need to be setuid."
>
> I'll pass on that one for now...
systrace could probably mitigate most of the risk here ... (privsep,
if you're good enoug
On 8/2/05, Michael C. Ibarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Scott;
>
> Ran across this one yesterday, just wasn't sure how secure it is as
> sftp-only. So far it looks like this will be what I may use, throwing
> in tcp-wrappers.
not a lot of difference between scp and sftp (aside from sftp bei
On 8/1/05, Michael C. Ibarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I am currently migrating/upgrading an entire farm of servers from
> RedHat Linux & Solaris to current and one of the roadblocks I am
> encountering is setting a chrooted sftp. I am aware of chroot.sf, but
> am looking for a solution
about it, and can manually mount the filesystem later after
parity is fixed. I posted about this a few days ago; check the archives.
(as I said earlier, my method may turn out to be a Bad Idea for some reason
that hasn't occurred to me yet; if this is the case, I'd appreciate a
heads-up
-t blk
If this is a Really Bad Idea, I'd appreciate a heads-up to that effect.
re-lurking,
--
Scott Francis | darkuncle(at)darkuncle(dot)net | 0x5537F527
Less and less is done
until non-action is achieved
23 matches
Mail list logo
