On 7/26/05, Greg Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/26/05, STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hopefully this more general question is appropriate here. I've
> > noticed sales for the Zaurus SL-5500. Geeks.com has a sale on
> > them right now.
> >
>
> I've been thinking about o
On 12/11/06, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sudenly there is an improved desire to keep up to date on the latest
> security fixes at work. I've got about 50 machines that I manage. OpenBSD,
> FreeBSD, Linux, Solairs, and HP-UX.
>
> I am looking for recomendations for a (hopefully automed), pre
I have a digital AlphaServer 1000 4/200 I would LOVE to load OpenBSD on. I
haven't succeeded yet. It is happily running FreeBSD currently. I'll give
OpenBSD another stab soon though :)
I run OpenBSD on my little laptop which is a pentium 100 maxed at 40 megs of
ram. Runs like a champ. I use i
I've been working with the InspIRCd group to try to get it working on
OpenBSD again. The server I'm doing this on is OpenBSD 4.2 on an
Alphaserver 1000 4/200.
There is a header which has the following section:
#ifdef __GNUC__
#define CUSTOM_PRINTF(STRING, FIRST) __attribute__((format(printf, STR
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Philip Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> gcc only started permitting function attributes on function
> definitions (as opposed to function declarations) in very recent
> versions, newer than the versions included with OpenBSD. To be
> portable to earlier versi
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:25 PM, f5b wrote:
> server
> kern.version=OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #71: Sat Apr 13 17:21:57
> MDT 2013
> dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
> /etc/ssh/sshd_config
> only add after last line
>
> Match Group share
>
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Xianwen Chen wrote:
> In general, our policy is to only document features that exist.
>> The list of features that don't exist would be a neverending list. If
>> you are reading something other than official openbsd documentation,
>> it's your responsibility to ve
I'm at work at the moment, so I can't test this on my OpenBSD machine at
home. However, have you tried setting IFS to a new line prior to feeding
newline separated output to xargs?
IFS="
"
some_command_that_generates_multiple_lines | xargs -n 1 some_other_command
Understand that "xargs -0" from l
I've always just tossed a comment onto the line before exiting vi edit mode
to prevent execution...
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS <
just22@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering how I could discard (not execute) a line after having
> loaded it into vi (fc -e
You can use the base ftp client to do http, and there is a flag for cookies
handling. What I'm not sure about is how far you'd get trying to do POST
specifically. Many sites will handle POST or GET so you might try changing
your approach to use GET instead?
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:33 PM, sven
Since you dropped the word production, most places would advise you to
follow stable and leave it at that. Upgrade when the next version becomes
available (May and November are the release months for OpenBSD) This is
sound advice. The other option is to follow current. If you choose to do
this
You can set TMOUT to read only so that it can't be changed by the user.
export TMOUT=90
readonly TMOUT
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Clint Pachl wrote:
> Here's my situation: I ssh into a remote server in my group. From that
> server, I connect to an adjacent, local server in the group via
It is a risk, but it's a small one. Generally speaking, the files will be
owned by that user, executed as that user, and pose a minimal risk since
"that user" is unprivileged. However, it does allow for compiling code
that could be used as a local privilege escalation and calling it from your
"ho
When you're this far behind, it might make more sense to grab a back up of
all of your relevant config files, a list of third party packages you need,
and such, and do a fresh install of the new version, then install missing
packages and bring in your backed up config files for comparison and revie
I don't know for sure, but my best guess is that you need to look at using
a profile to set ENV to include an appropriate TMPDIR (if necessary) as
well as to kick off the ssh-agent process.
>From the man page for rksh/ksh:
*-r* Restricted shell. A shell is ârestrictedâ if this option is used;
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Aioi Yuuko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to wean myself off external packages as much as possible. Is
> there a common, accepted way of viewing, for instance, battery life, with
> only included programs?
>
>
Possibly with sysctl taking a look at the hw.sensors.* stu
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Richo Healey wrote:
> On 28/04/15 05:28 +1200, Carlin Bingham wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, at 04:46 AM, whynot sudo wrote:
>>
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> We know it's safer* to use sudoedit, but what bad things can happen if we
>>> have the following in sudoers?
>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Dan Becker wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Paulm wrote:
>
>
> My main concern comes from the fact this process is being ran as root and
> injecting the username as an arg "$1"
>
> Example :
>
> What happens if someone runs ssh '"&rm -rf /'@host, is the
>From passwd(5) :
Similarly, login accounts not allowing password authentication but allowing
other authentication methods,
for example public key authentication, conventionally have 13 asterisks in
the password field.
I believe security(8) will stop barking about these accounts if you set the
enc
quot;nodev" and
"nosuid" options set.
I know this is a small thing, and comparing OpenBSD to the other systems
is kind of moot, I only bring this up because I'm trying to grasp the
reasoning
for this behavior.
Thank you for any responses,
Stefan Johnson
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011, Stefan Johnson wrote:
>
> > On most of the unix / unix-like systems I support, this behavior would be
> > different. The file would be created with user_a:group_a (since group_a
> is
> > t
ice.
You can just tell it to use "/" instead, and it will dump just fine as well.
Stefan Johnson
ne and not a production environment.
Maybe
someone else can speak to the wisdom of enabling/disabling it for your
scenario.
Stefan Johnson
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:23 PM, lancebaynes87
> wrote:
> > Are there any solutions?
> >
> > B I can't SSH to it anymore, because it asks for password.
> >
> > B Does anybody knows a solution for this problem??
>
>
If you have a NIM server,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:43 AM, David Walker wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have some accounts that don't require home directories or shells.
> In the past I used ftpd for web uploading and would do the
> shell==false thing and chroot them and set the login directory via the
> passwd file.
> Bye bye ftpd, h
ChrootDirectory /home/sftpuser
Where the user is named sftpuser and the home directory for the user is
/home/sftpuser.
>
> Hope this helped.
Stefan Johnson
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:10 AM, David Walker wrote:
> Hi Stefan.
>
> On 28/09/2011, Stefan Johnson wrote:
> > Please disregard my last... gmail sent the email before I was finished
> > composing it.
>
> I figured as much.
>
> > Using false for your shell is o
, again review the section in the man page on that.
Sorry for the bad information earlier.
Stefan Johnson
k for me, but I am still curious on why
script is provided with no scriptreplay in the core system. I appreciate
any and all responses!
Thanks,
Stefan Johnson
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <
ktulu+o...@wxcvbn.org> wrote:
> Stefan Johnson wrote:
> [snip]
> > I am aware that the port will work for me, but I am still curious on why
> > script is provided with no scriptreplay in the core system. I ap
le as stated)
>
>
> PS. Please CC me in replies. Thanks.
>
Done
Stefan Johnson
27;t know what to tell you. I've never seen anyone try to call a script
in the shebang before.
If you use #!/usr/bin/perl in the shebang for perl scripts you get expected
behavior. If you use
#!/bin/sh in the shebang for the shell scripts you get expected behavior.
Stefan Johnson
this would
work for me. Can anyone confirm that I'm pretty much stuck with only being
able to utilize 1/3 of
the full potential, or whether the above trick might actually work (using
appropriate size values, of
course)?
Thanks for any help on this!
Stefan Johnson
Below is dmesg and sysctl ou
r all that replied, and I do understand that if this
involves building a custom kernel to turn on the option
I forfeit support under that kernel :)
Stefan Johnson
://henningbrauer.com/
>
>
Thank you again to all who replied on and off list. The off list replies
indicated the same thing.
I'm glad Henning replied on list. Hopefully this will help others
searching the archives for
information about PAE on OpenBSD in future.
Again, thank you!
Stefan Johnson
35 matches
Mail list logo
