Also, if I boot from a USB stick, with only the new SSD attached, the softraid
is registered as degraded (as the other old disk is missing), so it has been
populated, and the partition is also marked with an asterisk for boot, but I
still cannot boot from that drive.
> I suspect this error comes from your BIOS/UEFI rather than the OpenBSD
> boot loader. Did you check how boot drives are configured in firmware?
I already tested that by moving the new disk to another box and boot it from
that, unfortunately I get the same error.
I have a softraid mirror setup with two old spinning disks. I have detached one
of the disks from the mirror and attached a new SSD. I then wanted to rebuild
the mirror, using one old spinning drive and the new SSD, and then afterwards,
remove the old spinning drive and replace with yet another
> Once data is no longer "work in progress", archive it to write-only
> media and take it out of the regular backup loop.
What kind of write-only media do you use/recommend?
Ever since I read a post on @misc from Nick Holland to someone asking
about running a large filesystem on OpenBSD, in which Nick wrote:
> ZFS is kinda the IPv6 of file systems. A few good ideas trying to
> solve a one issue... and then they went way overboard trying to pack
> too much else into i
I have an OpenBSD box running with a single drive. I wanted to add a
second drive and then run the two in a softraid mirror in order for the
first disk to not be a single point of failure in the box.
Is that possible or does the first disk needs to be reformattet and
repartitioned before adding a
In the latest book by Michael Lucas, OpenBSD Mastery: Filesystems, Michael
writes, "A filesystem should put data on disk. That data should be safely
stored and reliably read. That's it. Error checking? Deduplication? No.
The operating system has other tools for ensuring data integrity and
compactne
Hi,
I have setup an OpenBSD 7.2 machine running Heimdal 7.7.0 as a Kerberos
server. I then have an NFS Linux server running Arch Linux on another
machine. I then have a FreeBSD NFS client and another Arch Linux NFS
client on other physical hardware (all physical machines on the same LAN).
Without
The entry under Denmark listed with a company name "Zen System"
doesn't exist. There no longer is such a company, and the URL
redirects to a completely different company that doesn't provide
any kind of OpenBSD service.
Hi,
What is the code commit review process in OpenBSD? A developer with commit
access, does his code get reviewed by other developers before a release, and if
so, is that an internal requirement?
Thanks.
Kind regards.
Is there any particular reason why this issue is being ignored?
https://www.mail-archive.com/bugs@openbsd.org/msg15344.html
On Monday, September 6th, 2021 at 12:50 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 10:12:33PM +0000, iio7 wrote:
>
> > > On 2021-09-05, iio7 <
> > >
> > > i...@protonmail.com
> > >
> > > w
On Monday, September 6th, 2021 at 12:49 AM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
> iio7 i...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, September 5th, 2021 at 10:41 PM, Theo de Raadt
> > dera...@openbsd.org wrote:
> >
> > > iio7 i...@protonmail.com wrote:
&g
On Sunday, September 5th, 2021 at 10:41 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
> iio7 i...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On 2021-09-05, iio7 <
> > >
> > > i...@protonmail.com
> > >
> > > w
> On 2021-09-05, iio7 <
i...@protonmail.com
> wrote:
>> # mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /home/foo/tmp/
>> mount_tmpfs: tmpfs on /home/foo/tmp: Operation not supported
> It isn't built into the standard kernels, disabled with this commit::
> revision 1.229
> date:
# mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /home/foo/tmp/
mount_tmpfs: tmpfs on /home/foo/tmp: Operation not supported
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) Secure Email.
I am in the process of deploying an updated version of a PHP web application
that has been running on Apache and Nginx on Linux. This time I have done all
the development running the webserver on OpenBSD httpd+PHP. The setup is so
much simpler and I am used to running OpenBSD boxes as gateways/f
I have just installed MariaDB on a 6.9 box and I was wondering whether
adding a root password is needed? The root user can access the
database without a password by default, but IMHO if the box gets
compromised and someone reaches root access, adding a password to the
database root user doesn't rea
18 matches
Mail list logo
