Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-10-03 Thread Nate Schmoll
Why don't we just wait until the packages are officially available from the team? I'm pretty sure it will be before or on the documented release date. Exclusivity is quite contradictory to the project's objectives. On Oct 2, 2009, at 11:06 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: But we won't open up the

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-17 Thread Nate Schmoll
Can anyone point me in the direction of getting the release ISO for those of us that have ordered CDs? Thanks to all of the obsd ninjas...you guys are awesome. I'm pushing at our next blood cycle for a $10k contribution. We'll find out at the end of the month. Thanks to Theo and everyon

Re: contact info for PC Weasel?

2008-08-06 Thread nate
ith a serial port(assuming you only need 1, if you need lots of ports get a bigger model): http://www.avocent.com/CycladesTS100.aspx I haven't used that model myself, but have used tons of ACS-32 and ACS-48s. (before Cyclades was bought by Avocent, I hear since they have started to charge extra for a lot of the things that were free before). nate

Re: syslogd -a question

2008-08-06 Thread nate
e I believe that the hard link must be on the same file system as the target. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp]# ln /dev/log . [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp]# ls -il /dev/log /tmp/log 89638 srw-rw-rw- 2 root wheel 0 Aug 3 10:34 /dev/log 89638 srw-rw-rw- 2 root wheel 0 Aug 3 10:34 /tmp/log [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp]# nate

Re: pf macro behavior change between 4.1 and 4.3?

2008-08-04 Thread nate
= "25" > smtp = "25" > penguin = "216.39.174.25" > penguin = "216.39.174.25" > penguin_ports = "{" $ssh $smtp "}" > penguin_ports = "{ 22 25 }" Excellent! great to hear, thanks a bunch for your help. nate

Re: pf macro behavior change between 4.1 and 4.3?

2008-08-03 Thread nate
ctl/pf.conf probably could have done with an explicit > mention, but on plus43.html you find "Improvements in the > common parser code generator for various OpenBSD daemons" > which is meant to cover this too. Ok, good to know. I appreciate the quick response! thanks a bunch nate

Re: pf macro behavior change between 4.1 and 4.3?

2008-08-02 Thread nate
q doesn't mention commas either(for recursive macros): http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/macros.html thanks again nate

pf macro behavior change between 4.1 and 4.3?

2008-08-02 Thread nate
->4.2 and 4.2->4.3 but didn't notice anything that might trigger this. I also re-checked the FAQ and from what I can tell what I am doing is still valid. any ideas? thanks nate

Re: Quad ethernet card

2007-06-06 Thread nate
Henning Brauer wrote: > * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-05 21:44]: >> I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and >> was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode >> (pf disabled) measured using iperf. > > the sin

Re: Quad ethernet card

2007-06-05 Thread nate
, probably May-June 2005, I don't work at that company anymore so I don't recall exact specifics on everything. nate

Re: Unable to fsck after crash - cannot alloc 30231937 bytes for typemap

2007-06-05 Thread nate
es INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=21267992 (448 should be 384) CORRECT? yes PARTIALLY TRUNCATED INODE I=21267993 SALVAGE? yes INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=21267996 (8864 should be 8832) CORRECT? yes INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=21267997 (1152 should be 1120) CORRECT? yes [..] thanks!! nate

Unable to fsck after crash - cannot alloc 30231937 bytes for typemap

2007-06-05 Thread nate
ot jobs that it seemed to crash. I'm not as concerned right now about the crash but of course the inability to run fsck. Any suggestions? thanks nate

Re: About C++ and licensing on OpenBSD

2007-04-30 Thread Nate Montague
a pretty open declaration of it's likes and dislikes, sufficed to say, your stuff would not get into base no matter how nice it was. But it's your code, noone else ever even needs to know it exists. Nate

Re: Max number of states in pf? (100k? 200k? 1M?)

2005-09-23 Thread nate
o can get added to the docs at some point, since others have contacted me as well asking similar questions. thanks a lot(again) nate

Re: Max number of states in pf? (100k? 200k? 1M?)

2005-09-23 Thread nate
should I expect it to misbehave immediately upon reload(even if it isn't holding that many states) or not until it actually hits the state limit. thanks nate

Max number of states in pf? (100k? 200k? 1M?)

2005-09-22 Thread nate
ably will double that in the next 6 months or less). thanks nate

Re: OpenBSD favorable HW

2005-06-14 Thread nate
want a copy of the full specs of my openbsd systems mail me off list and I'll try to get it for you(price is 6 months out of date) hope this helps nate

Re: Tuning gigabit bridging firewall for better performance

2005-06-10 Thread nate
ess: 00:04:23:b3:d6:8e em7 at pci7 dev 1 function 1 "Intel PRO/1000MT DP (82546EB)" rev 0x03: irq 10, address: 00:04:23:b3:d6:8f doing this had no noticable impact on throughput or cpu time spend servicing interrupts. thanks nate

Re: A Business Case for integrating OpenBSD into IT Infrastructures

2005-06-10 Thread nate
ing for a while they tend to be fairly solid. note openbsd is really only on my firewalls, 85% of the rest of the systems are redhat enterprise 2.1/3, some win2k, a few HPUX, some debian(my preferred choice). nate

Re: Tuning gigabit bridging firewall for better performance

2005-06-10 Thread nate
ull opteron though my vendor could not find a SCSI raid card that ran stable under openbsd on opteron, so I went with Xeons for these firewalls. nate

Re: Tuning gigabit bridging firewall for better performance

2005-06-09 Thread nate
ool, if you or anyone has any suggestions let me know thanks nate

Tuning gigabit bridging firewall for better performance

2005-06-09 Thread nate
se? Or a better network card? thanks nate