Hello,
I have sslsplit listening on 127.0.0.1 port 10443 and I want redirect
all my outgoing desktop web traffic to sslsplit, then localhost port
10443. SSLSPLIT is just a kind of transparent proxy but cannot be used
as a conventional proxy (set up on the browser config). Reading the
pf.conf man
Hello I write again about the following sent mail to misc:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=171260331305047=2
I use the link to the archive because I deleted all the mailing list
mails then I can'f do a follow up.
Anyway I have some news.
If I run sndiod as my user with the following:
$
Hello, after upgrade to 7.5 (from 7.4) I have problems with all type of
videos on all chromium flavor (ungoogled-chromium and iridium). Going in
details the problem doesn't concern only youtube but all the videos in
all websites. But some videos work. For example youtube shorts. But on
all videos
Il 2024-04-08 09:14 Mizsei Zoltán ha scritto:
> Hi,
> vps$ doas pkg_add micro
> https://cloudflare.cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.5/packages-stable/amd64/:
> TLS handshake failure: handshake failed: error:02FFF00D:system
> library:func(4095):Permission denied
>
> You asked for others to do things you want. But we don't want the feature
> you want, because we consider it an anti-feature.
>
> We do not want to expose the kernel address space contents like you
> want, because it contains secrets information which is used for a wide
> variety of attach
>>
>> Thanks for your reply, but my emails didn't received the replies I
>> expected to have.
>> And to be honest I don't want to plunge into arid controversy.
>>
>
> This is not hate, BUT you are acting like a baby.
>
> 'Whaa wha you didn't do what I wanted'
Well, that's certainly an
>
> You are spending a lot of time telling very skilled people that
> you are both ignorant on this topic AND how to do their jobs.
>
I understand what you're saying, even though I'm not entirely sure
things are as you describe. However, it already seems important to me
that I managed to
>
> I don't see any hatred here. I think they understood the question just fine.
> I think perhaps you might be asking in the wrong place for
> voulenteers to write software for Volatility -- this is an OpenBSD list.
Yes, probably I missed that point. I'm sorry I didnt' understand for
that
> I saw no hatred in the post you replied to.
>
> OpenBSD developers are Makers, not Takers. They code for OpenBSD for
> themselves, not for the user community.
>
> The point is you should spend some time trying to contribute before you start
> asking for some "feature".
>
> I've been
Il 2023-08-18 19:42 Mike Larkin ha scritto:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 01:31:41PM +0000, whistlez wrote:
>> Il 2023-08-18 09:22 Omar Polo ha scritto:
>> > On 2023/08/18 02:06:11 +, whistlez wrote:
>> >> Il 2023-08-18 02:20 Scott Cheloha ha scritto:
>>
&
Il 2023-08-18 09:22 Omar Polo ha scritto:
> On 2023/08/18 02:06:11 +0000, whistlez wrote:
>> Il 2023-08-18 02:20 Scott Cheloha ha scritto:
>> >> On Aug 17, 2023, at 10:28, whistlez wrote:
>>
>> Furthermore, in my opinion - brace yourself, I might trigger an
Il 2023-08-18 02:20 Scott Cheloha ha scritto:
>> On Aug 17, 2023, at 10:28, whistlez wrote:
>>
>> https://github.com/volatilityfoundation/volatility3
>
> What is the utility of this software? How
> would supporting it benefit the project?
>
> I read the summ
Hello community, I would like to ask if it's possible to develop a tool
similar to Volatility in the future or a specific integration for
OpenBSD. Along with a tool that can perform RAM dumping. However, could
this potentially make the kernel vulnerable?
In my opinion, even though I'm not a
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 02:15:36PM +, b...@0x1bi.net wrote:
> Have you installed the wireless firmware?
> http://firmware.openbsd.org/firmware/
>
yeah of course without the firmware the interface doesn't work, and now I'm
using the wifi.
Hi,
I found the following error in the logs about the wifi driver iwm:
iwm0: could not remove binding (error 35)
iwm0: fatal firmware error
iwm0: could not remove binding (error 35)
iwm0: could not remove binding (error 35)
iwm0: failed to update MAC
iwm0: could not add MAC context (error 35)
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 07:32:36AM -0700, Luke A. Call wrote:
> On 03-05 04:18, Tomasz Rola wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:06:40AM +0100, whistlez...@riseup.net wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > in the following message:
> > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=1581
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:28:35PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On 2020-03-04 11:38, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > Probably not what you were looking for but, back in the days when I
> > was ultra paranoid about my web browsing, I used to use stripped down
> > live usb installations of Linux distros
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:38:40AM +, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 01:06, wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > in the following message:
> > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158110613210895=2
> > Theo discourages to use unveil instead of chroot.
> > I asked if he suggests the same for the
Hi,
in the following message:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158110613210895=2
Theo discourages to use unveil instead of chroot.
I asked if he suggests the same for the browser but he asked that chroot
is onlye for *root*.
Then what should I do to hardening the most exposed piece of code that
Hi,
I have the following bug:
https://marc.info/?t=15636262941=1=2
now I'm on 6.5 and it works, but maybe one month ago I tried to install
6.6 and I found the bug.
Anyone know if it was been resolved ?
Thanks
Whistlez
Hi, I need some details about ffs, I read the kernel source but my c
knowledge is very basic. I understood all about the superblock but my
problem is understand how the files are allocated on the disk.
Anyone could give me more details about files allocation ?
Thank you.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 09:45:06AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020-02-10, Janne Johansson wrote:
> > Den lör 8 feb. 2020 kl 11:31 skrev :
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> I have some strange output from dmesg, what could be ?
> >> At the follwoing link I've posted some screenshots:
> >>
Hi,
I have some strange output from dmesg, what could be ?
At the follwoing link I've posted some screenshots:
https://postimg.cc/gallery/1o4wsaw74/
Thank you
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 10:35:17AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> > I am considering replacing all chroot use with unveil in my processes even
> > where
> > no filesystem access is required.
>
> I am discouraging this.
>
> unveil is a complicated mechanism, and we may
24 matches
Mail list logo
