> You asked for others to do things you want. But we don't want the feature > you want, because we consider it an anti-feature. > > We do not want to expose the kernel address space contents like you > want, because it contains secrets information which is used for a wide > variety of attach surfaces. Secrets does not mean passwords, it means > contents and layout of objects an attacker will use. >
Thank you, this was the answer I was crying and stomping my feet for. > What you ask for is the opposite of what we would do. > > We won't do it. We don't want code that does it (not that you have any > code which does it). > > And that is the end of story. ok, thanks.
