Hi,
Various unknown facts are listed on the website http://khushiwebworld.com
http://khushiwebworld.com/ . The unknown facts are really good and I have
found it very useful, so thought to share the same with you. They are
categorized as
1.Unknown facts
2.Health Facts
3.Ayurveda
to what may be one of many backend drivers.
So, neither apm nor acpi (acpicpu) is needed to use hw.setperf?
no.
Also, the Enhanced SpeedStep support on my CPU reduces to
cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x061a082006000820
cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
to
cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x061a082006000820
cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 2667 MHz (1212 mV): speeds: 2667, 2000 MHz
- is there something I can do about it? Is there a point in running
current (as opposed
to
cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x061a082006000820
cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 2667 MHz (1212 mV): speeds: 2667, 2000 MHz
- is there something I can do about it? Is there a point in running
current (as opposed
as Enhanced SpeedStep CPU.
So, neither apm nor acpi (acpicpu) is needed to use hw.setperf?
(I can set hw.setperf manually.)
Also, the Enhanced SpeedStep support on my CPU reduces to
cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x061a082006000820
cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
kernel developers. hw.setperf is a uniform
userland interface to what may be one of many backend drivers.
So, neither apm nor acpi (acpicpu) is needed to use hw.setperf?
no.
Also, the Enhanced SpeedStep support on my CPU reduces to
cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr
On 2009-05-27, Bob Beck Via Secure Email b...@openbsd.org wrote:
Hi this is bob. really.
I can haz Ur Passwordz plz?
ohai, and Ur bank accountz and sinz too?
Ya. http://www.uknof.org.uk/uknof13/Fowler-Phish.pdf
The original message was received Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:58:20 +0300
from -
- The following address(es) had permanent fatal errors -
1727415071.20060613112736; originally to 1727415071.20060613112736
(unrecoverable error)
The recipient 'transfer-encod' is unknown
3derman
= 61443 (unknown)
On 2008-11-25, Christoph Leser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the above message in the tcpdump of
/var/run/isakmpd.pcap, when
a cisco router establishes quick mode to my openbsd. The
connect works
ok, just wondering what this message could mean. I have only seen
Hi,
I see the above message in the tcpdump of /var/run/isakmpd.pcap, when a
cisco router establishes quick mode to my openbsd. The connect works ok,
just wondering what this message could mean. I have only seen
'ENCAPSULATION MODE = TUNNEL' in this context.
As connect setup fails in the opposite
On 2008-11-25, Christoph Leser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the above message in the tcpdump of /var/run/isakmpd.pcap, when a
cisco router establishes quick mode to my openbsd. The connect works ok,
just wondering what this message could mean. I have only seen
'ENCAPSULATION MODE = TUNNEL'
Hi,
On Tue, 25.11.2008 at 12:11:42 +0100, Christoph Leser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it uses 3, if it initiates the exchange.
if so, I would guess that is the reason for the 'NO PROPOSAL CHOSEN' messages.
Can I configure 61443 es encapsulation mode in isakmpd.conf?
I'm not aware of such a
Hi misc@:
I tried :
$ swapctl -d /dev/wd0b
swapctl: /dev/wd0b: Unknown error: -682811376
$ swapctl -l
Device 512-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Priority
swap_device 294518400 29451840 0%0
why 24GB of swap?
It was a partitioning error (i didnt know that b
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Stefan Sczekalla
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 5:40 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Any Ideas ? isakmpd loggs: exchange_setup_p1: unknown exchange
type QUICK_MODE
... and send no answer back to xxx.yyy.zzz.uuu
My Host is an OpenBSD 3.8, the other - remote
... and send no answer back to xxx.yyy.zzz.uuu
My Host is an OpenBSD 3.8, the other - remote ( xxx.yyy.zzz.uuu ) is a
securepoint using strongswan.
17:11:22.476524 xxx.yyy.zzz.uuu.500 aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd.500: [udp sum ok]
isakmp v1.0 exchange ID_PROT
cookie:
Hello.
When starting X server I'm getting following message:
xauth: creating new authority file /home/raff/.serverauth.6489
xauth: (stdin):2: unknown command f7dc6384bd24019ab5620c73611c6135
xauth: (stdin):3: unknown command f7dc6384bd24019ab5620c73611c6135
xauth: (stdin):4: unknown command
-paris12.fr:443, client 194.214.13.40)
(OpenSSL library error follows)
[Wed Apr 16 11:53:30 2008] [error] OpenSSL: error:14094418:SSL
routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:tlsv1 alert unknown ca
Why is it so?
Regards,
Thierry.
Holidays in the unknown Italy
- Come to see the Italian Apennine, the enchanted Suviana lake, and its
bucolic and misterious Regional Park...
- This incontaminated and fairy-tale refuge is near Firenze, Bologna,
Pisa and the old roman thermal baths of Porretta.
- In the lake you can swim, fish
924020 Mar 20 08:46 /tmp/apsfilter20397/test_page.aps
lpr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unknown printer
0m0.00s real 0m0.00s user 0m0.00s system
[ press RETURN to continue ]
Can someone give me some tips on setting up a network printer? I
thought setting up a network printer would be a snap
:
Printing test page...
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 924020 Mar 20 08:46 /tmp/apsfilter20397/test_page.aps
lpr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unknown printer
0m0.00s real 0m0.00s user 0m0.00s system
[ press RETURN to continue ]
Can someone give me some tips on setting up a network printer? I
thought
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Ed Flecko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm using apsfilter on OBSD 4.2, and trying to set up an HP LaserJet printer.
I have an HP P2015DN and a 4240n, so printing to either one would be
fine with me.
You did start lpd?
I made this mistake with
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc-4_2_3-rc1 revision 131847
Native configuration is i386-unknown-openbsd4.2
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp/_Pragma1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/complit4.C (test for excess errors)
WARNING: g++.dg
Hi all,
My OBSD 4.0 using a PPPoE ADSL Internet connection and
it occasionally panic after running 4~8 hours. After
reboot I got unknown code (0x00d3) error, see below
for details.
Is this my ISP wrong or OBSD bug?
TIA
frank
==
# dmesg
...
pppoe: unknown code (0x00d3) session
On 6/12/07, Jan Stary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, _sometimes_ the boot gets into an endless loop saying
neo0: unknown int
How does such such a thing ever happen? Who writes into the card's
NM_INT_REG register and how can an unknown value ever get there?
normally, the card writes
Hi all,
I am running 4.1 on a Dell Latitude LS notebook. This machine uses the
Neomagic MagicMedia 256AV audio chip:
...
neo0 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 Neomagic MagicMedia 256AV rev 0x20
audio0 at neo0
...
Now, _sometimes_ the boot gets into an endless loop saying
neo0: unknown int
Hello misc@
here is a dmesg of my new system,
This post is to let the developers know about the unknown product (not
sure why it repeats so many times) I asume it is my Video Card
There is a single Nvidia 8800 GTS Video Card in this system
also on the Logitech G15 Keyboard keyboard
Motherboard w/ unknown product
Hello misc@
here is a dmesg of my new system,
This post is to let the developers know about the unknown product (not
sure why it repeats so many times) I asume it is my Video Card
There is a single Nvidia 8800 GTS Video Card in this system
also on the Logitech G15
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Sam Fourman Jr.
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 2:52 AM
To: OpenBSD-Misc
Subject: dmesg for Asus Striker Extreme Motherboard w/ unknown product
Hello misc@
here is a dmesg of my new system,
This post is to let the developers know about the unknown
I have problem with receiving email for virtual users:
Most of emails sent to a virtual user [EMAIL PROTECTED] receive OK
most of the time. However, some emails sent to that address get a
error message like this:
Feb 22 21:00:27 www sm-mta[1583]: l1MA0P1a001583: [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User
unknown
On 1/31/07, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting random unknown authentication state 1 and device
timeout messages with the built-in card on my T40.
Hi all,
I have similar problems with the iwi driver on my T43. I have the message :
iwi0: XXX too many rates (count=13, last=108
I'd like to say this is amusing..but it really isn't. I too receive the same
kernel messages from my iwi interface, though on a Dell Inspiron 8600.
The variety I see:
iwi0: fatal firmware error
iwi0: unknown authentication state 1
This is among one of the many reasons [EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm getting random unknown authentication state 1 and device
timeout messages with the built-in card on my T40.
The good news is that my ath cardbus card works great in 802.11b mode
but it doesn't have an external antenna, when the iwi is working it
works much, much better than the ath.
ath0
I don't know what I'm supposed to make of this:
=== Start Message ===
Subject: my host name daily insecurity output
Checking special files and directories.
Output format is:
filename:
criteria (shouldbe, reallyis)
.: permissions (0755, 0777)
=== End Message ===
On 26/10/06, Patrick Rutkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what I'm supposed to make of this:
=== Start Message ===
Subject: my host name daily insecurity output
Checking special files and directories.
Output format is:
filename:
criteria (shouldbe, reallyis)
On Oct 26, 2006, at 4:04 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Patrick Rutkowski wrote:
I don't know what I'm supposed to make of this:
=== Start Message ===
Subject: my host name daily insecurity output
Checking special files and directories.
Output format is:
filename:
I have just installed the 4.0-beta snapshot noticed a error message
when booting GENERIC.MP
cpu1: unknown i686 model 1, can't get bus clock
the machine is a old IBM PC 365, dual p-pro. the machine was previously
running 3.9-STABLE without any such errors.
Regards
Sevan / Venture37
OpenBSD
Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
I have just installed the 4.0-beta snapshot noticed a error message
when booting GENERIC.MP
cpu1: unknown i686 model 1, can't get bus clock
the machine is a old IBM PC 365, dual p-pro. the machine was previously
running 3.9-STABLE without any such errors.
Can you
(Apologies to the list: I was unable to make direct contact with Brad.)
Brad:
I sent you email twice this month regarding em(4)'s unknown link state
behavior, but have not heard back yet. Have you simply not had time to
reply yet or were my messages lost in transit?
Thanks.
Date: Sun, 9
On my laptop, starting at reboot and until I have inserted an ethernet
cable, em(4) leaves its if_link_state as LINK_STATE_UNKNOWN. This
causes problems for me because when trunk(4) is setup to use em(4) as
the master port, it will not failover to the secondary port until
if_link_state
Scott Plumlee wrote:
o?= wrote:
Hello,
My OpenBSD 3.9-stable Box is quite unstable. I don't have physical
access to my box so I can't debug it directly.
I've recompiled a GENERIC kernel with DEBUG support and
set ddb.panic
to 0 in sysctl.conf so that it's rebooting automaticly.
On 6/12/06, Jirtme Loyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Plumlee wrote:
Anyone who hasn't seen a broken piece of HW that works fine
with X but not Y is new to the game. Anyone who trusts a HW
diagnostic to give
them the answer is really, really new to the game.
By themselves, diagnostics
On 2006/06/12 08:24, Jirtme Loyet wrote:
Hey, if this problem turns out to expose a true logic bug in
OpenBSD, go ahead, find it, show us, and get credit for the
fix. But if everytime the panic is different, it sounds
like things are Just Plain Broke on the system, if a BIOS
upgrade
mem = 957259776 (934824K)
using 4278 buffers containing 52928512 bytes (51688K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(b3) BIOS, date 02/21/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf9350
apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown
apm0: flags 70102 dobusy 1 doidle 1
o?= wrote:
Hello,
My OpenBSD 3.9-stable Box is quite unstable. I don't have physical access to
my box so I can't debug it directly.
I've recompiled a GENERIC kernel with DEBUG support and set ddb.panic to 0
in sysctl.conf so that it's rebooting automaticly. But no kernel dump is
made after a
Scott Plumlee wrote:
o?= wrote:
Hello,
My OpenBSD 3.9-stable Box is quite unstable. I don't have physical
access to
my box so I can't debug it directly.
I've recompiled a GENERIC kernel with DEBUG support and set ddb.panic
to 0
in sysctl.conf so that it's rebooting automaticly. But no
hello.
what can i do with unknown at iic0 addr 0x18 not configured?
how can i recognize device behind? is it possible to find out
i2c-chip model without using screwdriver against my notebook?
thanks.
OpenBSD 3.9-stable (GENERIC) #1: Sat May 6 14:01:00 EEST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src
, but whatever I enter
(or if I simply press Continue), I always get an error page:
Cache Manager Error
Unknown host: localhost
I'm stymied; dig localhost works. :-(
Any clues?
Thanks in advance
Martin
--
http
Unknown host: localhost
I'm stymied; dig localhost works. :-(
Sounds like something you should ask on an appropriate mailing list.
If `telnet localhost 22` (or any other listening port) works, then this
isn't a problem for this mailing list.
Manager Interface comes up on
http://firewall:8080/cgi-bin/cachemgr.cgi, but whatever I enter
(or if I simply press Continue), I always get an error page:
Cache Manager Error
Unknown host: localhost
I'm stymied; dig localhost works
Hi,
Since I first put an OpenBSD 3.5-box on my ADSL-line i've been getting
messages like this every 30 minutes:
Aug 22 16:40:41 fortress-maximus dhclient[20645]: unknown dhcp option
value 0x51
DHCP works fine, but out of curiosity I looked in the RFC
(http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2939
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 01:05:29PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
It appears to be a DWL-G520+, (or AirPlus Extreme), so it just
isn't supported by OpenBSD.
So they changed the innards again? I had a DWL-G520+, which produced
only
Well, it seems that the important thing is that
...I guess I just need to replace hardware. Now-like...
viq
--
Startuj z INTERIA.PL! http://link.interia.pl/f186c
ifconfig mediaopt hostap
and the system again did freeze (this time without the timeout message).
Any help to debug and maybe fix this problem is welcome. It would
also be helpful if other users with that unknown regdomain problem
could test the patch above, although I've to admit that I'm
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 08:44:51PM +0200, Lists wrote:
Try to overwrite the reg domain directly in :
/usr/src/sys/dev/ic/ar5xxx.c
/*
* Enable to overwrite the country code (use 00 for debug)
*/
#if 1
#define COUNTRYCODE de
#endif
Unfortunately, that doesn't change behaviour, just the
201 - 254 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
