I think this is too wordy; and that such long comments in configuration
files are uncalled for.
If it belongs anywhere, perhaps it belongs in the manual page?
Problem is this is not the final story. I bet some parts of it will
change over the coming year already.
> Now that the IPv4 address spa
On 2011-02-22, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> I think your IPv4 text unwisely suggests that using e.g. 192.0.2.0/24
> for your own stuff is okay. That's true only until you put a device with
> an appropriate list of "unroutable IPs" on your network, etc.
the same applies to the standard rfc1918 nets w
On 22. feb. 2011, at 16.22, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 03:04:25PM +0100, Pete Vickers wrote:
>> Now that the IPv4 address space if fully allocated, perhaps it's time to
>> update the comments in /etc/hosts ? Here is my attempt at a reasonably
concise
>> update:
>>
>> # Assig
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 03:04:25PM +0100, Pete Vickers wrote:
> Now that the IPv4 address space if fully allocated, perhaps it's time to
> update the comments in /etc/hosts ? Here is my attempt at a reasonably concise
> update:
>
> # Assignments from RFC5735 (supersedes RFC1918)
> #
> # Allocated
Now that the IPv4 address space if fully allocated, perhaps it's time to
update the comments in /etc/hosts ? Here is my attempt at a reasonably concise
update:
# Assignments from RFC5735 (supersedes RFC1918)
#
# Allocated for use as the Internet host loopback address:
# 127.0.0.0/8
#
# Allocat
5 matches
Mail list logo
