Re: /etc/hosts during install

2016-03-12 Thread Robert Peichaer
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 05:49:32PM +0100, hans wrote: > On Mar 12 16:36:37, rob...@peichaer.org wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:57:04PM +0100, hans wrote: > > > Has the attitude towards /etc/hosts changed again? > > > After a fresh install of current/i386, > > > > > > 127.0.0.1 local

Re: /etc/hosts during install

2016-03-12 Thread hans
On Mar 12 17:25:45, rob...@peichaer.org wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 05:49:32PM +0100, hans wrote: > > On Mar 12 16:36:37, rob...@peichaer.org wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:57:04PM +0100, hans wrote: > > > > Has the attitude towards /etc/hosts changed again? > > > > After a fresh inst

Re: /etc/hosts during install

2016-03-12 Thread hans
On Mar 12 16:36:37, rob...@peichaer.org wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:57:04PM +0100, hans wrote: > > Has the attitude towards /etc/hosts changed again? > > After a fresh install of current/i386, > > > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > > ::1 localhost > > 192.168.22.4w

Re: /etc/hosts during install

2016-03-12 Thread Robert Peichaer
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:57:04PM +0100, hans wrote: > Has the attitude towards /etc/hosts changed again? > After a fresh install of current/i386, > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > ::1 localhost > 192.168.22.4www.stare.cz www > > The first two I would expect. > Th

/etc/hosts during install

2016-03-12 Thread hans
Has the attitude towards /etc/hosts changed again? After a fresh install of current/i386, 127.0.0.1 localhost ::1 localhost 192.168.22.4www.stare.cz www The first two I would expect. The last one was assigned to me via DHCP during install; I am changi