On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:44:21PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
On 09/03/13 14:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Yes, the routes to carp interfaces in BACKUP are advertised but with a
low priority (better to have the route stay in the table, even if it goes
On 12/03/13 00:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
On 09/03/13 14:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Yes, the routes to carp interfaces in BACKUP are advertised but with a
low priority (better to have the route stay in the table, even if it goes
to a backup firewall,
We changed the default state from UNKNOWN to INVALID, but backup is still DOWN
(which probably needs to stay like that, most things do want it to work like
this but ospfd is a special case).
Claudio Jeker clau...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:44:21PM +, Stuart Henderson
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:10:12AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
We changed the default state from UNKNOWN to INVALID, but backup is
still DOWN (which probably needs to stay like that, most things do want
it to work like this but ospfd is a special case).
Still this feels wrong -- at least
On 2013/03/12 09:27, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:10:12AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
We changed the default state from UNKNOWN to INVALID, but backup is
still DOWN (which probably needs to stay like that, most things do want
it to work like this but ospfd is a special
On 09/03/13 14:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012-11-16, Matt Hamilton ma...@netsight.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
From what I've read previously I've seen that ospfd will advertise
routes on carp interfaces that are in the BACKUP state. Is this
still the case these days with 5.2? Whilst I'm sure I
On 11/03/13 16:13, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
carp8 has the inet address. On backup firewall (10.0.0.3)
the setup is similar (except metric 101)
correction: even with same metric only the master in advertising.
G
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
On 09/03/13 14:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Yes, the routes to carp interfaces in BACKUP are advertised but with a
low priority (better to have the route stay in the table, even if it goes
to a backup firewall, rather than have it drop in and out).
Sorry
On 2012-11-16, Matt Hamilton ma...@netsight.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
From what I've read previously I've seen that ospfd will advertise
routes on carp interfaces that are in the BACKUP state. Is this
still the case these days with 5.2? Whilst I'm sure I can do some
magic with ifstated, I just
On 2013-03-09, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2012-11-16, Matt Hamilton ma...@netsight.co.uk wrote:
in other news: slrn message sorting confuses me at times. :-)
Hi All,
From what I've read previously I've seen that ospfd will advertise
routes on carp interfaces that are in the BACKUP state. Is this
still the case these days with 5.2? Whilst I'm sure I can do some
magic with ifstated, I just wanted to make sure I'm not solving
something that is already
11 matches
Mail list logo
