Hi,
Seeing the answer to my question I'm afraid I wasn't clear enough about the
purpose of it. I'm aware that authpf/pf is behaving as intended, I was just
wondering if any change on that is planned because I'm guessing that I'm not
the only one who would find useful to be able to keep the non aut
This list tends to favor those who do at least some basic homework
before asking redundant questions. Had you read the authpf man page or
searched the list archives, you would have certainly realized that what
you are describing is EXACTLY the intended behavior, in other words,
your system is w
Hello,
Seeing that nobody is answering to the question below I'd add: Is there
anybody who uses authpf in the same scenario? Does it behave like in my
case? Any suggestion to keep the states for the user after he/she closes the
session?
Thank you.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Derek wrote:
Hi list,
I'm using authpf to allow external users to access to certain restricted
services within our network. This network hosts public services as well,
this is services which are open to all internet.
The thing is that after some tests I realized that a client who has an
authpf session opened
4 matches
Mail list logo