Reyk Floeter writes:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Dustin Fechner wrote:
> > On 12/06/2012 08:10 PM, Maximo Pech wrote:
> >> that there isn't a single production ready, gnupg-like, BSD licensed
> >> tool out there (I don't have the skills and time to program one
> >> myself).
> >
> > NetBSD ha
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Dustin Fechner wrote:
> On 12/06/2012 08:10 PM, Maximo Pech wrote:
>> that there isn't a single production ready, gnupg-like, BSD licensed
>> tool out there (I don't have the skills and time to program one
>> myself).
>
> NetBSD has netpgp, which is BSD licensed:
>
You can use S/MIME with openssl as alternative to PGP.
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:10:17PM -0600, Maximo Pech wrote:
> It's incredible for me that OpenBSD, an operating system that claims to
> have integrated cryptography (yes I know that the cryptography is on the
> core OS layers) doesn't have i
> 1: I'm not sure there are no developers that would like to see this in
>base, but they could have other priorities; wanting something not
>necessarily means having (time) to do the work. The important
>difference is that you don't hear them.
I find gpg useful.
I think the main barr
Maximo Pech [mak...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> I already knew an answer (not the only one) could be "write it".
>
What others did you have in mind? "Thank you for bringing the most important
software project of modern time to our attention. We will now begin writing it
for you." ???
> > >
> > > Do
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:20:08PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
| On 12/10/12 21:45, Maximo Pech wrote:
| ...
| > Well, with the information you have given me so far, I think the answer is
| > something like "nobody has written it because we have more important things
| > to do and nobody believes th
On 12/10/12 21:45, Maximo Pech wrote:
...
> Well, with the information you have given me so far, I think the answer is
> something like "nobody has written it because we have more important things
> to do and nobody believes there is a real need for that". Am I right?
>
I have lived a long time a
2012/12/9 Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > Maximo Pech [mak...@gmail.com] wrote:
> >> I said I can't code that.
> >
> > If you already knew the answer was "write it", then you asked the wrong
> > question.
>
I already knew an answer (not the only on
On 12/09/12 06:50, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
,,,
>> OpenSSH and OpenBSD IPsec represent the OpenBSD solutions to the quality and
>> licensing problems in those areas. OpenSSH is still the gold standard,
>> OCF/IPsec,
>> maybe not. PGP worked
Nico Kadel-Garcia [nka...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> SSH is the gold standard: OpenSSH is the popular and effective
> freeware version, which did solve a number of issues. The early
> history of SSH is interesting, and covered reasonably well at
> http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/ssh/ch01
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Maximo Pech [mak...@gmail.com] wrote:
>> I said I can't code that.
>
> If you already knew the answer was "write it", then you asked the wrong
> question.
>
>> I know that gnupg is in the ports tree, but it
>> just seems strange to me that i
Maximo Pech [mak...@gmail.com] wrote:
> I said I can't code that.
If you already knew the answer was "write it", then you asked the wrong
question.
> I know that gnupg is in the ports tree, but it
> just seems strange to me that it isn't on the base system, because for me
> it sounds logical that
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 13:10, Maximo Pech wrote:
> It's incredible for me that OpenBSD, an operating system that claims to
> have integrated cryptography (yes I know that the cryptography is on the
> core OS layers) doesn't have in the base system a tool like gnupg, and
> even more incredible, th
I said I can't code that. I know that gnupg is in the ports tree, but it
just seems strange to me that it isn't on the base system, because for me
it sounds logical that if one of the key points of openbsd is cryptography,
it would have a bsd tool like gnupg. The netpgp thing looks very cool, I
did
Maximo Pech wrote:
It's incredible for me that OpenBSD, an operating system that claims to
have integrated cryptography (yes I know that the cryptography is on the
core OS layers) doesn't have in the base system a tool like gnupg, and
even more incredible, that there isn't a single production re
2012/12/6 Maximo Pech :
> I'd like to know your thoughts about this.
Shut up and show us your code.
On 12/06/2012 08:10 PM, Maximo Pech wrote:
> that there isn't a single production ready, gnupg-like, BSD licensed
> tool out there (I don't have the skills and time to program one
> myself).
NetBSD has netpgp, which is BSD licensed:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netpgp
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Maximo Pech wrote:
> It's incredible for me that OpenBSD, an operating system that claims to
> have integrated cryptography (yes I know that the cryptography is on the
> core OS layers) doesn't have in the base system a tool like gnupg, and
> even more incredible,
It's incredible for me that OpenBSD, an operating system that claims to
have integrated cryptography (yes I know that the cryptography is on the
core OS layers) doesn't have in the base system a tool like gnupg, and
even more incredible, that there isn't a single production ready,
gnupg-like, BSD
19 matches
Mail list logo
