Re: Baffling Syntax Errors When Adding altq Rules to pf Firewall

2014-02-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014-02-13, Peter N. M. Hansteen pe...@bsdly.net wrote: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:18:09PM -0800, Scott Vanderbilt wrote: This is running OpenBSD 5.5-beta on i386 (Jan. 22 snapshot). 5.5-beta has the new traffic shaping code in it, and there was an irresolvable conflict over the 'queue'

Re: Baffling Syntax Errors When Adding altq Rules to pf Firewall

2014-02-13 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org writes: This is quite a different rule; the old one limits outgoing bandwidth to 100Kb/s and _within that 100Kb/s_ it prioritizes certain traffic. This suggested replacement isn't throttling the packets going out of the interface at all, so unless there's

Re: Baffling Syntax Errors When Adding altq Rules to pf Firewall

2014-02-12 Thread Philip Guenther
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Scott Vanderbilt li...@datagenic.com wrote: I am at my wits' end trying to figure out why I keep getting syntax errors when loading the pf ruleset below. The rules worked fine until I started to add altq rules, in anticipation of adding VOIP service to the local

Re: Baffling Syntax Errors When Adding altq Rules to pf Firewall

2014-02-12 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:18:09PM -0800, Scott Vanderbilt wrote: This is running OpenBSD 5.5-beta on i386 (Jan. 22 snapshot). 5.5-beta has the new traffic shaping code in it, and there was an irresolvable conflict over the 'queue' keyword. In the general case I would say you could opt to