On 2-2-2012 17:34, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> Camiel Dobbelaar sentia.nl> writes:
>
>> Can you post the output of "netstat -m" and a dmesg?
>
> # netstat -m
> 94 mbufs in use:
> 88 mbufs allocated to data
> 3 mbufs allocated to packet headers
> 3 mbufs allocated to socket nam
Camiel Dobbelaar sentia.nl> writes:
> Can you post the output of "netstat -m" and a dmesg?
# netstat -m
94 mbufs in use:
88 mbufs allocated to data
3 mbufs allocated to packet headers
3 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses
87/938/8192 mbuf 2048 byte clusters in u
On 2-2-2012 16:38, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> Camiel Dobbelaar sentia.nl> writes:
>
>> Can you show the output of:
>> - ifconfig carp
>> - ifconfig -g carp
>> - netstat -s -p carp
>> - sysctl net.inet.carp
>
> Ahhh... actually, I noticed mbuf memory error with one of these:
>
> # netstat -s -p carp
Camiel Dobbelaar sentia.nl> writes:
> Can you show the output of:
> - ifconfig carp
> - ifconfig -g carp
> - netstat -s -p carp
> - sysctl net.inet.carp
Ahhh... actually, I noticed mbuf memory error with one of these:
# netstat -s -p carp
carp:
3112793 packets received (IPv4)
0
On 01/25/12 18:23, Matt Hamilton wrote:
>
> pass in quick on $ext_if proto carp from $fw_ext_ips to 224.0.0.18
> queue carp_out
> pass in quick on $int_if proto carp from $fw_int_ips to 224.0.0.18
> queue carp_in
> pass out quick on $ext_if proto carp from $fw_ext_ips to 224.0.0.18
> queue carp_ou
On 25-1-2012 18:23, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> I'm also getting strange weirdnesses with carp on 5.0. I too upgraded
> from quite an old 4.x version (4.6 IIRC).
>
> The main thing I'm seeing is my master and backup switching back and
> forth quite a few times. This is a pair of firewalls with carp
> r
I'm also getting strange weirdnesses with carp on 5.0. I too upgraded
from quite an old 4.x version (4.6 IIRC).
The main thing I'm seeing is my master and backup switching back and
forth quite a few times. This is a pair of firewalls with carp
running on both the inside and outside firewall interf
On 01/12/12 00:05, Markus Wernig wrote:
> If I set net.inet.carp.log=7, I get lots of the following on both fws,
> only for carp1 and carp2, never for carp0 and carp3:
> carp2: ip_output failed: 65
> carp1: ip_output failed: 65
> carp2: ip_output failed: 65
> carp1: ip_output failed: 65
> carp2: i
Hello all
I have recently upgraded a pair of CARPed firewalls from 4.6 to 5.0
(late, I know ...) after almost 2 years of absolutely flawless operation
(ipv4 interfaces only).
I have changed all the nat/rdr rules in pf.conf to the new syntax, not
changed any other fw/nw setting (at least to my kno
9 matches
Mail list logo
