Thank you all for clarifying this, guys. I'll give you feedback on the
diff when I try it out.
Theo de Raadt schreef:
.
# pas on re0 from any \ #
# to any port 59#
.
is it expected behavior that pfctl comp
> >On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:07:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> # pas on re0 from any \ #
> # to any port 59#
> >[...]
> >>> i would think the good reason is that the line is not a comment
> >>> as you imagine, but would effectively turn into:
> >[...]
>
I disagree. I think this is a bug in all these lexers, and we should
fix it.
\ is the only special case that says "ignore both". In any other
case \ should translate into just the character .
This \ special case "it is an errors that a few people
will make, so fail when we encounter it" stuff
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:07:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
# pas on re0 from any \ #
# to any port 59#
[...]
i would think the good reason is that the line is not a comment
as you imagine, but would effectively turn into:
[...]
\
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:07:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > # pas on re0 from any \ #
> > > # to any port 59#
[...]
> > i would think the good reason is that the line is not a comment
> > as you imagine, but would effectively turn into:
[...]
> \ is the o
On 5/22/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i would think the good reason is that the line is not a comment
> as you imagine, but would effectively turn into:
I disagree. I think this is a bug in all these lexers, and we should
fix it.
\ is the only special case that says "ignor
> > .
> >
> > # pas on re0 from any \ #
> > # to any port 59#
> >
> > .
> >
> > is it expected behavior that pfctl complains about a space after the
> > backslash, DESPITE the line being a comment?
> > Or is
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:40:47PM +0200, Paulo Rodriguez wrote:
>
> .
>
> # pas on re0 from any \ #
> # to any port 59#
>
> .
>
> is it expected behavior that pfctl complains about a space after the
> backs
Hi guys, just a quick question.
During some toying with pf I noticed something. When making a comment
like the following:
.
# pas on re0 from any \ #
# to any port 59#
.
is it expected behavior that pfctl
9 matches
Mail list logo