On 2008-11-02, Steven Surdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must be missing something then. Why not use 4.3.2.2 as the carp
> interface IP and no IP address on the physical interfaces? I'm not sure
> how well this will play with OpenBGPD, someone else will have to chime
> in there.
I haven't tr
> -Original Message-
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
> >Of
> >> Rod Whitworth
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:49 PM
> >> To: Miscellaneous OBSD
> >&g
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:24:13 +0100, Claer wrote:
>Did you look at ifstated ? I tryed it for 2 firewalls with 1 pppoe link.
>This setup didn't go on production but worked fine during tests.
With seven NICs plus one for carp/pfsync including an IPv6 transit, an
IPv4 transit and a peer link with IPv
IL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> >Of
> >> Rod Whitworth
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:49 PM
> >> To: Miscellaneous OBSD
> >> Subject: Deploying carp with limited global IPs
> >>
> >> In preparing for a possible
tc/hostname.carp0:
>inet 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252 192.168.1.3 vhid 1 carpdev xxx0
>
>-Steve S.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of
>> Rod Whitworth
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:49 P
xxx0
-Steve S.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Rod Whitworth
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:49 PM
> To: Miscellaneous OBSD
> Subject: Deploying carp with limited global IPs
>
> In preparing for a possible car
In preparing for a possible carp redundacy setup for a client's border
router/firewall I have found no information so far as to whether it is
possible to have carp working where the link to the ISP is a /30.
Every example I have found in presentations and tutorials has used 3
IPs on a typical dual
7 matches
Mail list logo
