On 14.08.2012 23:57, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:35:40PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
>> On 14.08.2012 17:58, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 04:39:57PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:35:40PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> On 14.08.2012 17:58, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 04:39:57PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> >>> On 13.08.2012 23:34, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>
On 14.08.2012 17:58, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 04:39:57PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
>>> On 13.08.2012 23:34, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 04:39:57PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> > On 13.08.2012 23:34, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> > >> On 11.08.2012 23:33, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> On 13.08.2012 23:34, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> >> On 11.08.2012 23:33, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> >> I still have my previous issue, but I have another one : while the
On 13.08.2012 23:34, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
>> On 11.08.2012 23:33, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
>> I still have my previous issue, but I have another one : while the
>> in-board display device is actived through my xorg.conf, the udl devi
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> On 11.08.2012 23:33, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> > # wsconsctl -f /dev/ttyC0 display.type
> > display.type=vga-pci
> > # wsconsctl -f /dev/ttyD0 display.type
> > display.type=displaylink
> > # wsconsctl -f /dev/ttyE0 display.type
> > d
On 11.08.2012 23:33, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> # wsconsctl -f /dev/ttyC0 display.type
> display.type=vga-pci
> # wsconsctl -f /dev/ttyD0 display.type
> display.type=displaylink
> # wsconsctl -f /dev/ttyE0 display.type
> display.type=displaylink
I still have my previous issue, but I have another one
> Since I havn't seen a dmesg i guess that wsdisplay0 is your graphics card
> on your pc (/dev/ttyC0). udl0 is wsdisplay1 (/dev/ttyD0). So udl1 is
> wsdisplay2 (/dev/ttyE0).
>
> You can use wsconsctl to verify which device it should be.
You're right (my dmesg is at the end of my reply) :
# wsconsc
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> On 11.08.2012 20:22, Mats O Jansson wrote:
> >> So I did sh MAKEDEV ttyD1, and modify my xorg.conf like,
> > Where did you get ttyD1 from? Try to add ttyE0.
> >
> I have chosen ttyD1 because I think I had to choose the next ttyD* after
> ttyD0.
>
> U
On 11.08.2012 20:22, Mats O Jansson wrote:
>> So I did sh MAKEDEV ttyD1, and modify my xorg.conf like,
> Where did you get ttyD1 from? Try to add ttyE0.
>
I have chosen ttyD1 because I think I had to choose the next ttyD* after
ttyD0.
Unfortunately, I have the same error with ttyE0.
Thanks for y
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> On 02.08.2012 22:31, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> > On 02.08.2012 21:48, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> >>
> >> This is the xorg.conf I use to test wsudl:
> >>
> >> Section "Devicë
> >> Identifier "Card0"
> >> Driver "wsudl"
> >> Opt
On 02.08.2012 22:31, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> On 02.08.2012 21:48, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>>
>> This is the xorg.conf I use to test wsudl:
>>
>> Section "Devicë
>> Identifier "Card0"
>> Driver "wsudl"
>> Option "Devicë "/dev/ttyD0"
>> EndSection
>>
>> (Yes that's it. M
On 03.08.2012 23:02, Mats O Jansson wrote:
> Hmm, looking at the message you get about modes it seems that they are
> generated by dev/videomode/edid.c. Recompile it with EDIDVERBOSE defined.
> That might give us more information on whats going on...
> What kind of display is connected to the udl
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> Thanks Mats for your answer.
>
> >> The chip is a DL-165. Maybe it is my problem. UDL(4) mentions that :
> >> DESCRIPTION
> >> The udl driver supports USB display devices based on the DisplayLink
> >> DL-120 / DL-160 graphic chip.
> >
> > No
Thanks Mats for your answer.
>> The chip is a DL-165. Maybe it is my problem. UDL(4) mentions that :
>> DESCRIPTION
>> The udl driver supports USB display devices based on the DisplayLink
>> DL-120 / DL-160 graphic chip.
>
> Nope, DL-165 is supported. But looking at udl.c i see that is
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Alexis de BRUYN [Mailinglists] wrote:
> The chip is a DL-165. Maybe it is my problem. UDL(4) mentions that :
> DESCRIPTION
> The udl driver supports USB display devices based on the DisplayLink
> DL-120 / DL-160 graphic chip.
>
> Regards,
Nope, DL-165 is supported.
On 02.08.2012 21:48, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>
> This is the xorg.conf I use to test wsudl:
>
> Section "Devicë
> Identifier "Card0"
> Driver "wsudl"
> Option "Devicë "/dev/ttyD0"
> EndSection
>
> (Yes that's it. Modern X can figure out everything else).
Thanks for your
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:15:04PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN [Mailinglists] wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I have an issue with DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI and OpenBSD 5.1/amd64 (and
> snapshot/amd64). X cannot be launched, I have got the following error :
> wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver
>
> T
> Could this be related to the space preceding in the device declaration?
> Option "device" "/ dev/wsdisplay1" --> Option "device" "/dev/wsdisplay1"
Thanks for your reply, Вовочка, but this is a typo mistake I have made
while I write my mail.
--
Alexis de BRUYN
Hi List,
I have an issue with DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI and OpenBSD 5.1/amd64 (and
snapshot/amd64). X cannot be launched, I have got the following error :
wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver
The device is detected, dmesg :
-
udl0 at uhub6 port 2 "DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI" rev 2.00
21 matches
Mail list logo
