On 20/12/13 16:56, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
On 18/12/13 22:32, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
I think a documentation fix for pf.conf(5) is all that can be done.
The diff adds the following paragraph:
When listening sockets are bound
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
> On 18/12/13 22:32, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
>>
>> On 18/12/13 14:50, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
On 18/12/13 13:53, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>
>
> When writing out
Em 19-12-2013 11:30, Maxim Khitrov escreveu:
> That's pretty much what I managed to come up with yesterday. I have
> the following two rules at the top: match out from (self) tag SELF
> block out log quick received-on all tagged SELF The second rule is
> mostly a sanity check. It ensures that you c
On 18/12/13 22:32, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
On 18/12/13 14:50, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
On 18/12/13 13:53, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
When writing outbound rules in pf, is there an accepted best practice
for only matching packets that are either
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
> Em 18-12-2013 21:33, Andy Lemin escreveu:
>> Fantastic! Thanks Camiel :)
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 18 Dec 2013, at 21:32, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
>>>
On 18/12/13 14:50, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at
Em 18-12-2013 21:33, Andy Lemin escreveu:
> Fantastic! Thanks Camiel :)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 18 Dec 2013, at 21:32, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
>>
>>> On 18/12/13 14:50, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
> On 18/12/13 13:53, Maxim Khitro
Fantastic! Thanks Camiel :)
Sent from my iPhone
> On 18 Dec 2013, at 21:32, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
>
>> On 18/12/13 14:50, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
On 18/12/13 13:53, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
When writing outbound rules in p
On 18/12/13 14:50, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
On 18/12/13 13:53, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
When writing outbound rules in pf, is there an accepted best practice
for only matching packets that are either forwarded or
firewall-generated?
The best t
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
> On 18/12/13 13:53, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>
>> When writing outbound rules in pf, is there an accepted best practice
>> for only matching packets that are either forwarded or
>> firewall-generated?
>>
>> The best that I could come up with i
On 18/12/13 13:53, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
When writing outbound rules in pf, is there an accepted best practice
for only matching packets that are either forwarded or
firewall-generated?
The best that I could come up with is 'received-on all' as a way of
identifying forwarded packets, but that opt
When writing outbound rules in pf, is there an accepted best practice
for only matching packets that are either forwarded or
firewall-generated?
The best that I could come up with is 'received-on all' as a way of
identifying forwarded packets, but that option can't be negated to
match packets that
11 matches
Mail list logo
