On 2024 Jun 04 (Tue) at 12:46:11 +0300 (+0300), Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
:
:On 04/06/2024 11:59, Stuart Henderson wrote:
:> On 2024-06-04, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
:>> On 04/06/2024 08:50, jrmu wrote:
: When you manage a hypervisor, using only 1x/64 is less than ideal. It's
just
: not
On 04/06/2024 11:59, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2024-06-04, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>> On 04/06/2024 08:50, jrmu wrote:
When you manage a hypervisor, using only 1x/64 is less than ideal. It's
just
not enough because you can have more than 1 'type of usage'. I always
req
Hi,
On 04/06/2024 09:50, jrmu wrote:
When you manage a hypervisor, using only 1x/64 is less than ideal. It's just
not enough because you can have more than 1 'type of usage'. I always
request at least 1x/56.
Thanks. I spoke with the ISP and he gave me a larger subnet,
2602:fccf:4::/48, I've be
On 2024-06-04, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 04/06/2024 08:50, jrmu wrote:
>>> When you manage a hypervisor, using only 1x/64 is less than ideal. It's just
>>> not enough because you can have more than 1 'type of usage'. I always
>>> request at least 1x/56.
>> Thanks. I spoke with the ISP and he
On 04/06/2024 08:50, jrmu wrote:
>> When you manage a hypervisor, using only 1x/64 is less than ideal. It's just
>> not enough because you can have more than 1 'type of usage'. I always
>> request at least 1x/56.
> Thanks. I spoke with the ISP and he gave me a larger subnet,
>
> 2602:fccf:4::/48, I
> When you manage a hypervisor, using only 1x/64 is less than ideal. It's just
> not enough because you can have more than 1 'type of usage'. I always
> request at least 1x/56.
Thanks. I spoke with the ISP and he gave me a larger subnet,
2602:fccf:4::/48, I've been experimenting it by manually ad
On 2024/05/21 20:30, jrmu wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> > > I also don't control the entire /48.
> > >
> > > Here is the information I was given:
> > >
> > > My IPv6 Address Subnet: 2602:fccf:400:41::/64
> > > Hypervisor' IPv6 Gateway: 2602:fccf:400::1
> > >
> > > I was only given a /64.
> >
> > So you
Greetings,
> > I also don't control the entire /48.
> >
> > Here is the information I was given:
> >
> > My IPv6 Address Subnet: 2602:fccf:400:41::/64
> > Hypervisor' IPv6 Gateway: 2602:fccf:400::1
> >
> > I was only given a /64.
>
> So you should use a /64 prefix length not the /48 which you hav
.
On 21/05/2024 22:04, jrmu wrote:
Greetings,
Here is my configuration:
Inside hypervisor:
hypervisor$ cat /etc/hostname.em1
inet 104.167.241.211 0xffc0
inet6 2602:fccf:400:41:: 48
Why are you using 48 as mask here and not 64?
I don't have control over the hypervisor's gateway, th
On 2024-05-21, jrmu wrote:
>
> --qhuug7BO2jqFJSbi
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Greetings,
>
>> > Here is my configuration:
>>=20
>> > Inside hypervisor:
>>=20
>> > hypervisor$ cat /etc/hostname.em1
>> >
Greetings,
> > Here is my configuration:
>
> > Inside hypervisor:
>
> > hypervisor$ cat /etc/hostname.em1
> > inet 104.167.241.211 0xffc0
> > inet6 2602:fccf:400:41:: 48
>
> Why are you using 48 as mask here and not 64?
I don't have control over the hypervisor's gateway, that is provided b
Hi
On 21/05/2024 04:01, jrmu wrote:
> Here is my configuration:
> Inside hypervisor:
> hypervisor$ cat /etc/hostname.em1
> inet 104.167.241.211 0xffc0
> inet6 2602:fccf:400:41:: 48
Why are you using 48 as mask here and not 64?
Here is a suggestion in term of routing.
From your configura
Greetings,
I'm running into issues with IPv6 networking using vmm with an openbsd guest,
both running OpenBSD 7.5. Setup and diagnostic info here:
https://paste.ircnow.org/05ejwpmf4hi74xuz0h2n
I am setting up an openbsd virtual machine inside vmm using this
configuration:
https://wiki.ircnow.
13 matches
Mail list logo
