Paul B. Henson [hen...@acm.org] wrote:
>
> I didn't find anything really conclusive. Evidentally the main
> difference (http://supermicro.biz/support/faqs/faq.cfm?faq=11847) is
> that the 82574L is a fully separate ethernet interface connected over
> pcie, whereas the 82579LM is just a PHY that co
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:30:36PM +0400, Alexander Pakhomov wrote:
> Both should not load CPU a lot. But that doesn't mean they wouldn't.
> Write here if notice intense interrupts CPU load. My OpenBSD 5.4 amd64
> laptop fail to handle 2 MB/s wifi due to some drivers issues (they
> load CPU up to
Test it.
Both should not load CPU a lot. But that doesn't mean they wouldn't.
Write here if notice intense interrupts CPU load. My OpenBSD 5.4 amd64 laptop
fail
to handle 2 MB/s wifi due to some drivers issues (they load CPU up to 100%
interrupts).
Additional info about interrupts load would be h
I've got a box with one Intel 82574L based ethernet port and one 82579LM
based ethernet port. One will be hooked up to a 50Mbps wan link, the
other trunked at gigabit speed to a cisco switch (both routing the wan
link, routing some internal vlans, and providing some services).
Both the 82574L and
4 matches
Mail list logo
