2015/10/07 0:10 "ÐÑÑÑÑ ÐÑÑомин" :
>
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:20:31AM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:52 PM, ÐÑÑÑÑ ÐÑÑомин
wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:07:24PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> >
By now the thread starter should already be well aware that the
correct thing would have been to ask for some comforting words the
report from the third party code audit was and is going to result in
further improvements.
And then thank the developers for sharing the audit details, the work
done
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:20:31AM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Артур Истомин wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:07:24PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> >> The smtpd code is very good.
> >
> > static void
> > filter_tx_io(struct io *io, int
On 18:47 Mon 05 Oct , Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> I maintain both distribution packages for it (Gentoo), as well as my
> entire infrastructure, which is based on OpenSMTPD. I've "bet the
> farm" on the project, so to speak.
Oh, so you were that guy who released "stable" ebuild without Berkeley
DB
You obviously never lived through the sendmail era. The smtpd code is very
good. Bugs happen, and how the creators of a program react to them is
what matters. The qualsys results were promptly dealt with.
I don't think there is much to discuss other than diffs that further the
project.
STeve
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:47:18PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
Hi,
I initially didn't intend to answer but I feel insulted by your comments
and some facts need to be set straight.
> It has been, therefore, to my extreme dismay to discover in recent
> months the sheer number
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:07:24PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> The smtpd code is very good.
static void
filter_tx_io(struct io *io, int evt)
{
struct filter_session *s = io->arg;
size_t len, n;
char*data;
char
Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> But I think it's time we take a step back and reassess the situation.
> There are some critical questions that need to be answered. What
> accounts for the high proportion of security vulnerabilities in a
> project renowned for its brilliant developers and stringent
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Артур Истомин wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:07:24PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
>> The smtpd code is very good.
>
> static void
> filter_tx_io(struct io *io, int evt)
> {
> struct filter_session *s = io->arg;
> size_t
Hi folks,
Like many others, when I learned that OpenBSD was creating from
scratch an SMTP daemon, I was thrilled. The OpenBSD name has for a
long time been connected with security, stability, and reliability. I
was excited to see an extremely easy to configure yet powerful SMTP
daemon coming from
10 matches
Mail list logo