On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:07:28PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 20.04.2009 at 11:55:05 +0200, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
wrote:
and in any case this is less about ramdisk size but more about
raidframe which we're going to get rid off eventually (when marco ever
there certainly are size restrictions on RAMDISK_CD.
On 2009-04-19, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all.
Is there any particular reason to not have RAIDFrame built-in in
RAMDISK_CD kernels? I mean, are there any restrictions, except
kernel/ramdisk size, which are not the case
On 20 April 2009 G. 11:38:19 Stuart Henderson wrote:
there certainly are size restrictions on RAMDISK_CD.
Sorry for stupid questions, but what those restrictions are and what is
the reason for them? It's not the disk space, obviously. And if
RAMDISK_CD kernel could not load into memory then this
off the top of my head (remembered from bumping into limits with
flashboot), I think there are some restrictions imposed by ISA, and
of course some small machines have limited RAM which this eats into.
On 2009/04/20 11:59, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
On 20 April 2009 ?. 11:38:19 Stuart Henderson
On 20 April 2009 c. 13:55:05 Henning Brauer wrote:
and in any case this is less about ramdisk size but more about
raidframe which we're going to get rid off eventually (when marco ever
gets softraid upt o a usable level, read rebuild working)
Hell, yes! But eventually is not till the end of
and in any case this is less about ramdisk size but more about
raidframe which we're going to get rid off eventually (when marco ever
gets softraid upt o a usable level, read rebuild working)
* Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org [2009-04-20 11:38]:
off the top of my head (remembered from
On 20 April 2009 c. 14:14:18 Henning Brauer wrote:
* Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com [2009-04-20 12:02]:
On 20 April 2009 ?. 13:55:05 Henning Brauer wrote:
and in any case this is less about ramdisk size but more about
raidframe which we're going to get rid off eventually (when marco
Hi,
On Mon, 20.04.2009 at 11:55:05 +0200, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
wrote:
and in any case this is less about ramdisk size but more about
raidframe which we're going to get rid off eventually (when marco ever
gets softraid upt o a usable level, read rebuild working)
please also
* Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net [2009-04-20 17:16]:
Hi,
On Mon, 20.04.2009 at 11:55:05 +0200, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
wrote:
and in any case this is less about ramdisk size but more about
raidframe which we're going to get rid off eventually (when marco ever
gets
On 4/20/2009 2:08 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
please also wait for in-place conversion before ripping raidframe out,
so users can say something like raidctl upgrade raid0 or similar,
if at all possible.
muhahahahahahaha
keep dreaming
Not only that, but putting an upgrade utility in a release
Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Hello all.
Is there any particular reason to not have RAIDFrame built-in in
RAMDISK_CD kernels? I mean, are there any restrictions, except
kernel/ramdisk size, which are not the case with RAMDISK_CD, obviously?
Maybe I missed something digging through Google output
11 matches
Mail list logo
