On 31 October 2010 20:01, Diana Eichert deich...@wrench.com wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:02:47AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
whether you like it or not, IPv6 deployment is gaining strength.
I worked on more exception documents and other
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
I bet they don't like IPX either.
ah, context and relevance :)
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
I'm proud of it.
Well actually, University of Alberta doesn't sound v6 enabled either...
Steph
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote:
I bet they don't like IPX either.
NO, bad nightmares
IPX over a T1 bridge
make it stop, make it stop
I bet they don't like IPX either.
On Nov 1, 2010, at 18:58, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
I'm proud of it.
Well actually, University of Alberta doesn't sound v6 enabled either...
Steph
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:02:47AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
whether you like it or not, IPv6 deployment is gaining strength.
I worked on more exception documents and other excuses than products
that would support it ;-)
Lets hope the youtubes
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 02:01:33PM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:02:47AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
whether you like it or not, IPv6 deployment is gaining strength.
I worked on more exception documents and other
On 10/31/2010 04:01 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
excuses only go for so long. I tell you IPv6 deployment is moving
forward.
Perhaps we can shame them into facing facts:
$ dig +short www.netbsd.org
2001:4f8:3:7:2e0:81ff:fe52:9a6b
$ dig +short www.freebsd.org
2001:4f8:fff6::21
$ dig
excuses only go for so long. I tell you IPv6 deployment is moving
forward.
Perhaps we can shame them into facing facts:
$ dig +short www.netbsd.org
2001:4f8:3:7:2e0:81ff:fe52:9a6b
$ dig +short www.freebsd.org
2001:4f8:fff6::21
$ dig +short www.openbsd.org
silence
2010/10/31 Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org:
I'm proud of it.
Why? Do you believe 6.0 will still be run on IPv4 addresses only?
Best
Martin
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
On 10/31/2010 04:01 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
excuses only go for so long. B I tell you IPv6 deployment is moving
forward.
Perhaps we can shame them into facing facts:
$ dig +short www.netbsd.org
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote:
SNIP
The US government mandates it and then when it gets to the people who
support it they use V4. It is a beautiful thing. Go committee design!
Ask theo for his much smarter IPv5 idea.
once upon a time the UG gov't mandated network gear had to
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:02:47 -0600 (MDT)
Diana Eichert deich...@wrench.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote:
SNIP
The US government mandates it and then when it gets to the people who
support it they use V4. It is a beautiful thing. Go committee design!
Ask theo for
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:02:47AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote:
SNIP
The US government mandates it and then when it gets to the people who
support it they use V4. It is a beautiful thing. Go committee design!
Ask theo for his much smarter IPv5
On 10/30/2010 04:18 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Lets hope the youtubes and facebooks go v6 so that they get of my v4
lawn.
No need to hope:
$ dig +short www.v6.facebook.com
2620:0:1cfe:face:b00c::3
Brad
15 matches
Mail list logo
