The issue is now resolved. The alert message no longer appears.
Thank you.
Kihaguru.
On 4/10/19, Kihaguru Gathura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The message below refers. Has httpd met the particular requirement
> 6.5.1 - 6.5.10 as shown? or is it a matter of further configuration.
>
> "Requirement 6.5
>
On 04/10/2019 20:22, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Kihaguru Gathura [pqscr...@gmail.com] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The message below refers. Has httpd met the particular requirement
>> 6.5.1 - 6.5.10 as shown? or is it a matter of further configuration.
>>
>> "Requirement 6.5
>> Fingerprinted versions of web
Kihaguru Gathura [pqscr...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The message below refers. Has httpd met the particular requirement
> 6.5.1 - 6.5.10 as shown? or is it a matter of further configuration.
>
> "Requirement 6.5
> Fingerprinted versions of web software used on the website may contain
>
I think that point was badly made by the site, they don't list what they
did look at or how they deduced it, only that "it may" even though that
same report later says no version string was sent as if that was a good
thing. I guess this means "because you did as expected and did not send a
Hi,
The message below refers. Has httpd met the particular requirement
6.5.1 - 6.5.10 as shown? or is it a matter of further configuration.
"Requirement 6.5
Fingerprinted versions of web software used on the website may contain
publicly known vulnerabilities (cf. PCI DSS 6.5.1-6.5.10).
5 matches
Mail list logo