Re: Opinion about Rust and Go

2017-03-29 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi, On 03/29/17 11:42, Janne Johansson wrote: As a non-obsd dev but fan of running non-mainstream platforms, things like this feels like a guarantee that those languages don't really hit off on anything that isn't arm64 or amd64 (or i386): and for that reason firefox will become less

Re: Opinion about Rust and Go

2017-03-29 Thread bytevolcano
You know things are bad when a programming language is named after a type of often-unwanted corrosion (often associated with iron alloys) or a type of devastating plant fungus. And what good are these "memory-safe" languages when there are so many that you won't be able to remember them? On Tue,

Re: Opinion about Rust and Go

2017-03-29 Thread Janne Johansson
2017-03-28 23:59 GMT+02:00 : > Hello, > > I just want to know the opinion of OpenBSD developpers about Rust and Go, > I already know Ted's opinion. > http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/thoughts-on-replacement-languages > > As they are both touted as memory safe, what do

Re: Opinion about Rust and Go

2017-03-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017-03-28, wrote: > Hello, > > I just want to know the opinion of OpenBSD developpers about Rust and Go, > I already know Ted's opinion. > http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/thoughts-on-replacement-languages > > As they are both touted as memory

Re: Opinion about Rust and Go

2017-03-28 Thread Donald Allen
On 28 March 2017 at 17:59, wrote: > Hello, > > I just want to know the opinion of OpenBSD developpers about Rust and Go, > I already know Ted's opinion. > http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/thoughts-on-replacement-languages > > As they are both touted as memory safe, what

Opinion about Rust and Go

2017-03-28 Thread narvu454
Hello, I just want to know the opinion of OpenBSD developpers about Rust and Go, I already know Ted's opinion. http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/thoughts-on-replacement-languages As they are both touted as memory safe, what do you think about them ? Regards