On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 20:57:25 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016-12-15, Tom wrote:
> >> Thanks. I was wondering about a bug with LCP echoes I accidentally
> >> introduced that made it into 5.9 (fixed for 6.0).
> > could you please point me to the changes you are talking about here.
>
In effort to troubleshoot an increase in LCP keepalive timeouts have gone
ahead & placed the APU’s PPPoE interface in debug mode
At this point it appears that for a approximately 60 seconds this morning no
lcp echo req were received & a LCP keepalive timeout occurred shortly there
after.
In addit
On 2016-12-15, Tom wrote:
>> Thanks. I was wondering about a bug with LCP echoes I accidentally
>> introduced that made it into 5.9 (fixed for 6.0).
> could you please point me to the changes you are talking about here.
> I started using pppoe in 5.9 and the LCP-echo gave me a hard time. I
> frequ
Todd
At this point I’ve elected to evaluate a MSS of 1452 to determine if a
theoretical max is beneficial.
In addition I’m currently testing a fixed MTU of 1492 on one LAN interface
in conjunction with my PS4 console.
Based on troubleshooting this afternoon it appears the number of device
interr
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:58:43 -0600, Patrick Dohman wrote:
> I'm currently running a ZyXEL C1100Z VDSL2 modem.
>
> At this point the hardware WAN interface (RE1) is configured with an MTU of
> 1500
>
> In addition the PPPOE interface is configured with an MTU of 1492
Are you setting the MSS to 1
Holger
I’m currently running a ZyXEL C1100Z VDSL2 modem.
At this point the hardware WAN interface (RE1) is configured with an MTU of
1500
In addition the PPPOE interface is configured with an MTU of 1492
Please see below for more info:
[patrick@Firewall etc]$sysctl -a | grep ifq
net.inet.ip.if
hi
what kind of DSL you have ( DSL or VDSL2 ) ?
if you use VDSL2 is AUTO MTU Active ? ( Mother Interface
have to be set to MTU 1508 , and no MTU Setting das the PPPOE
Interface.)
what says pfctl -si ( Line congestion )
what say sysctl -a | grep ifq ?
holger
> Stuart
>
> Thanks for the rep
Stuart
Thanks for the reply
At this point it appears a specific LAN client “PS4” is responsible for a
high number of device interrupts.
Hoping to clarify if interrupts In excess of “3000” can cause PPPOE
timeouts.
#
#
L
Stuart
Thanks for the reply
At this point it appears a specific LAN client “PS4” is responsible for a
high number of device interrupts.
Hoping to clarify if interrupts In excess of “3000” can cause PPPOE
timeouts.
#
#
L
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:05:08 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016-12-15, Patrick Dohman wrote:
> > Stuart
> >
> > Please see below for more info:
> >
> > Please note the 5.7 dmesg is subsequent to a reboot.
>
> Thanks. I was wondering about a bug with LCP echoes I accidentally
> intr
On 2016-12-15, Patrick Dohman wrote:
> Stuart
>
> Please see below for more info:
>
> Please note the 5.7 dmesg is subsequent to a reboot.
Thanks. I was wondering about a bug with LCP echoes I accidentally
introduced that made it into 5.9 (fixed for 6.0).
Nothing stands out from what you've sent
> OpenBSD 5.7 (GENERIC.MP) #881: Sun Mar 8 11:04:17 MDT 2015
5.7 is not supported anymore. Besides that, there is a huge
improvement of wireless stuff in -current. I can't believe you didn;t
notice that. Are you serious by not upgrading?
Stuart
Please see below for more info:
Please note the 5.7 dmesg is subsequent to a reboot.
##
[patrick@Firewall etc]$cat hostname.athn0
up media autoselect mediaopt hostap mode 11a chan 56 nwid wpa
wpaprotos wpa2 wpakey
10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
Your dmesg is missing.
Tom
Specific to your question the apu1d4 is configured to act as DSL bridge/PPPOE
gateway on one ethernet interface.
In addition a PCIe Atheros AR9281 is configured as a host-based access point
for wireless clients & a second ethernet interface is configured to supply
DHCP to la clients via a swi
Hello Patrick,
your mail sounds a bit confusing. I assume you have a following setup:
- your board is configured as router.
- your internal interface is the wireless athn0
- your external interface is pppoe0 on a wired interface (like re0),
but you do not tell us.
>> Specifically if wireless retr
Hoping to determine if PPPOE timeouts can be caused by 802.11 interference.
Specifically if wireless retransmission and specifically interface can
potentially cause pppope timeouts when acting as a bridge.
At this point it appears the physical location of the pc-engine results in
more frequent ti
17 matches
Mail list logo
