Should I post bug report if I'm sure that this is the PF problem?
Could you recommend me other network performance test which can do
_many_ connections at a time.
Thank you.
2007/7/13, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> pass log quick on $int_if proto tcp from $me to 10.10.10.10 port 80
^^^
Is it any better without logging?
>>> And `pfctl -si` have normal values.
It's better to include the output. Also sysctl net.inet.ip.ifq.
# pfctl -si
Status: En
> pass log quick on $int_if proto tcp from $me to 10.10.10.10 port 80
^^^
Is it any better without logging?
>>> And `pfctl -si` have normal values.
It's better to include the output. Also sysctl net.inet.ip.ifq.
2007/7/13, Adriaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 7/13/07, TuxR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I trying to use OpenBSD under high load and have problems with PF.
>
> When there is very many connections to server in some point other
> connections just failes.
>
> I try to use simple test applic
On 7/13/07, TuxR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello.
I trying to use OpenBSD under high load and have problems with PF.
When there is very many connections to server in some point other
connections just failes.
I try to use simple test application that creates 1000 connections to
server for 100
Hello.
I trying to use OpenBSD under high load and have problems with PF.
When there is very many connections to server in some point other
connections just failes.
I try to use simple test application that creates 1000 connections to
server for 1000 iteration. Maximum number I have observed w
6 matches
Mail list logo
