On 2017-09-09, Lukasz Jendrysik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since the main goal of OpenBSD is security, I keep wondering about one
> thing.
> There are packages like irssi or Thunderbird that should be updated to
> the newest upstream version.
> For example irssi's upstream encourages all users to upgra
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 21:16:36 +0200, Lukasz Jendrysik
wrote:
> Similar situation with Chromium etc. All of those packages exists in
> newer versions in -current, but it's not an option in my case.
>
> I understand that -stable is not place for the latest packages
> available and it's expected to
On 09/09/2017 22:23, Theo de Raadt wrote:
For example irssi's upstream encourages all users to upgrade to the
newest one, see:
https://irssi.org/2017/07/07/irssi-1.0.4-released/
Similar situation with Chromium etc. All of those packages exists in
newer versions in -current, but it's not an opti
Hello,
Since the main goal of OpenBSD is security, I keep wondering about one
thing.
There are packages like irssi or Thunderbird that should be updated to
the newest upstream version.
For example irssi's upstream encourages all users to upgrade to the
newest one, see:
https://irssi.org/2017/
> >> I understand that -stable is not place for the latest packages available
> >> and it's expected to be rock solid, but also secure.
> The thing is that mentioned packages are already updated in MAIN.
Twice the work == twice the work.
> I'm curious how looks the process of merging package upda
> Since the main goal of OpenBSD is security, I keep wondering about one
> thing.
> There are packages like irssi or Thunderbird that should be updated to
> the newest upstream version.
These two sentences don't make sense together. You equate "update
update" with security.
That doesn't make s
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:45 PM, enclair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the FAQ says:
>
> "When serious bugs or security flaws are discovered in third party software,
> they are fixed in the *-stable* branch of the ports tree. Remember that the
> lifecycle is 1 release: only the current and last release are up
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:45:10 +0200
enclair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the FAQ says:
>
> "When serious bugs or security flaws are discovered in third party
> software, they are fixed in the *-stable* branch of the ports tree.
> Remember that the lifecycle is 1 release: only the current and last
> release
Hi,
the FAQ says:
"When serious bugs or security flaws are discovered in third party software,
they are fixed in the *-stable* branch of the ports tree. Remember that the
lifecycle is 1 release: only the current and last release are updated"
Does it mean:
1) 4.8-stable and -current have securit
9 matches
Mail list logo
