Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-26 Thread Craig Skinner
3 * PII 350s on a small office LAN, all 3.8 release & binary only: LAN server, home dirs, backups, mail, 2 * 3Gig drives, 128Mb ram: Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0a 49.3M 23.3M 23.6M50%/ /dev/wd0h 295M6.0K280M 0%/tmp /dev/wd0

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-22 Thread Ted Unangst
On 1/21/06, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lots of fsck time and an unbootable system if I understand this stuff. > > Actually, since fsck is all about metadata (inodes), a big, mostly-empty > isn't going to take much longer to check

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-22 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 02:15:37PM -0600, J Moore wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:42:08PM +0800, the unit calling itself Lars > Hansson wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:30:34 -0600 > > > > Get a bigger H/D... 40 GB is about the smallest you can buy today; 4 GB > > > drives have not been mad

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-21 Thread Kevin
On 1/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lots of fsck time and an unbootable system if I understand this stuff. Actually, since fsck is all about metadata (inodes), a big, mostly-empty isn't going to take much longer to check than a smaller partition with the same number of used

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-21 Thread Tony
On Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:16 PM the calling itself J Moore wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:42:08PM +0800, the unit calling itself > Lars Hansson wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:30:34 -0600 > > > > Get a bigger H/D... 40 GB is about the smallest you can buy > today; 4 GB > > > drive

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-21 Thread J Moore
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:42:08PM +0800, the unit calling itself Lars Hansson wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:30:34 -0600 > > Get a bigger H/D... 40 GB is about the smallest you can buy today; 4 GB > > drives have not been made in years. > > Why? 4Gb is more than enough for trying out OpenBSD.

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-21 Thread Lars Hansson
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:30:34 -0600 J Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Get a bigger H/D... 40 GB is about the smallest you can buy today; 4 GB > drives have not been made in years. Why? 4Gb is more than enough for trying out OpenBSD. --- Lars Hansson

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-21 Thread J Moore
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:29:51AM -0800, the unit calling itself M... wrote: > Hello. > > I'm playing with OpenBSD 3.8 and would like some > comments/advice on partitioning. > I have a 500MHz test machine, 256MB RAM, 4GB H/D, > 100/1Gb intel ethernet card. << snip >> > Opinions please. Get a b

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-20 Thread Nick Holland
M... wrote: ... > I know swap used to be 2x the memory, but does that > still hold with 256MB RAM installed ? as opposed to > years ago with 32MB or 64MB ? That advice is as bogus now as it was then. The answer is, "use what YOU need". Most of the time, if your system starts swapping, you are hur

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-20 Thread Han Boetes
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0a 118M 56.8M 55.5M51%/ /dev/wd0d 98.3M8.0K 93.4M 0%/tmp /dev/wd0e 490M 91.4M374M20%/var /dev/wd0f 49.4M1.5M 45.4M 3%/var/qmail /dev/wd0g 3.8G1.5G2.2G

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-20 Thread M...
--- Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Suggestion 2: Quit trying to allocate all your disk > space. Leave some > empty space at the end that you can move into if you > need to. Make var > and home 500M ea., leave a gig or so free, put /var > at the end of > allocated space, if you find o

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-20 Thread Eric Johnson
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:08:47 +0100 Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about /var/spool/mail or, for example, /var/spool/uucp? Yes, > I may be oldfashioned, but IMHO the first filesystem that fills up > is always /var. For my mail server, I created a /var/mail partition of 10 GB. I

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-20 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 03:13:21PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote: > > / = 500MB > > too big. 150MB will do it VERY nicely. 200MB if you think I'm > being too tight. 70M will do fine, too. :) Or even 50M (3.8 on i386), but this would be a little bit on the edge. > > /tmp - 100MB > > Paranoia make

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-20 Thread David Higgs
See FAQ 4.6. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#SpaceNeeded You forgot the swap partition. Also, your / is probably way overkill. I haven't run a production mail/list/ftp server, so I can't speak for the remaining estimates. --david On 1/20/06, M... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello. > > I'

Re: Partition sizing

2006-01-20 Thread Nick Holland
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:29:51AM -0800, M... wrote: > Hello. > > I'm playing with OpenBSD 3.8 and would like some > comments/advice on partitioning. > I have a 500MHz test machine, 256MB RAM, 4GB H/D, > 100/1Gb intel ethernet card. > > Most of the examples show separate partitions for > > / >

Partition sizing

2006-01-20 Thread M...
Hello. I'm playing with OpenBSD 3.8 and would like some comments/advice on partitioning. I have a 500MHz test machine, 256MB RAM, 4GB H/D, 100/1Gb intel ethernet card. Most of the examples show separate partitions for / /tmp /var /usr /home I want to run a mailsever (20 users), (spamassasin/cla