Re: Update features on PF(OpenBSD4.2)

2007-10-23 Thread Henning Brauer
* Beavis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-22 18:29]: hi folks, I saw this performance issue with pf on a AMD64firewall: below is the link http://www.nabble.com/firewall-is-very-slow%2C-something%27s-wrong-t4572653i20.html it states that pf on 4.2 performs much better than in 4.1. having

Re: Update features on PF(OpenBSD4.2)

2007-10-23 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: doing teh boring, pretty riskless 10 minutes taking 4.2 upgrade everybody could easily do, for some combinations of crappy old hardware, too small memory size and nonsensically large filesystems it might stretch into 20-odd minutes, but otherwise my

Re: Update features on PF(OpenBSD4.2)

2007-10-22 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:20:41AM -0600, Beavis wrote: | hi folks, | |I saw this performance issue with pf on a AMD64firewall: below is the link | | http://www.nabble.com/firewall-is-very-slow%2C-something%27s-wrong-t4572653i2 0.html | | it states that pf on 4.2 performs much better than in

Re: Update features on PF(OpenBSD4.2)

2007-10-22 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On 10/22/07, Beavis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi folks, I saw this performance issue with pf on a AMD64firewall: below is the link http://www.nabble.com/firewall-is-very-slow%2C-something%27s-wrong-t4572653i20.html it states that pf on 4.2 performs much better than in 4.1. having said

Re: Update features on PF(OpenBSD4.2)

2007-10-22 Thread Beavis
thanks for the reply guys, I currently run CARP and pfsync on both boxes (upgrade can be done with less downtime) though i haven't tried to stress test my setup, i guess this upgrade is do-able. instead of coding (im not a coder). regards, -beavis On 10/22/07, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED]