Hi Tony,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal
wrote:
Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and
ospfd
?
on bgpd.conf you might want to do this:
match from $peer1 inet prefix xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xx prefixlen bla_bla set
rtlabel from_bgpd
on ospfd.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal
> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and ospfd
>> ?
>>
>>
> on bgpd.conf you might want to do this:
>
> match from $peer1 inet prefix x
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:25:22 +0700, Tony Sarendal
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Insan Praja SW
wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal
wrote:
Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and
ospfd
?
on bgpd.conf you might w
* Tony Sarendal [2010-10-23 14:29]:
> rtlabel label
> Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel routing
> table.
>
> Is this an error in the page or me reading it wrong ?
debatable... this could be worded better. with rtlabel foo, bgpd will
add the labe
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Tony Sarendal [2010-10-23 14:29]:
> > rtlabel label
> > Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel
> routing
> > table.
> >
> > Is this an error in the page or me reading it wrong ?
>
> debatable.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 03:20:45PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> > * Tony Sarendal [2010-10-23 14:29]:
> > > rtlabel label
> > > Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel
> > routing
> > > table.
On 2010-10-23, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> rtlabel label
> Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel routing
> table.
I think this should be:
Add the prefix to the kernel routing table with the specified label.
Index: bgpd.conf.5
===
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-10-23, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> > rtlabel label
> > Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel
> routing
> > table.
>
> I think this should be:
>
> Add the prefix to the kernel routing table
* Tony Sarendal [2010-10-23 19:03]:
> How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
in general? OSPF routes have priority over BGP routes. that's
implemented kernel routing table side and the daemons setting the
priority field to their respective priorities when inserting
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Tony Sarendal [2010-10-23 19:03]:
> > How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
>
> in general? OSPF routes have priority over BGP routes. that's
> implemented kernel routing table side and the daemons setting
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Tony Sarendal wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
>> * Tony Sarendal [2010-10-23 19:03]:
>> > How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
>>
>> in general? OSPF routes have priority over BGP routes. tha
* Tony Sarendal [2010-10-23 20:50]:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Tony Sarendal [2010-10-23 19:03]:
> > > How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
> > in general? OSPF routes have priority over BGP routes. that's
> > implemented kerne
On 2008-06-17, Russell Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a pair of firewall routers running OpenBSD (4.1 and 4.2 at
> present - need to get them updated) and I recently added an IPsec tunnel
> to their configurations, using ipsecctl and ipsec.conf complete with
> sasyncd.
>
> This works f
13 matches
Mail list logo
