Hi,
I'm learning to use vi. I find that the buffer operation is different in
vi than vim. For example, in vim, it is ':bn', ':bp', and ':bd' to go
to next and previous buffer, and to close a buffer. Vi does not seem to
have them implemented.
Because of the popularity of vim, a lot of docu
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 15:48, Xianwen Chen wrote:
> I'm learning to use vi. I find that the buffer operation is different in
> vi than vim. For example, in vim, it is ':bn', ':bp', and ':bd' to go
> to next and previous buffer, and to close a buffer. Vi does not seem to
> have them implemented.
Ted Unangst wrote:
I think the easiest option is to install vim and use that.
I was going for that option. I asked the question on the list anyway. I
thought I might have missed something.
In general, our policy is to only document features that exist.
The list of features that don't exist wou
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Xianwen Chen wrote:
> In general, our policy is to only document features that exist.
>> The list of features that don't exist would be a neverending list. If
>> you are reading something other than official openbsd documentation,
>> it's your responsibility to ve
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:48:15PM +0200, Xianwen Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm learning to use vi. I find that the buffer operation is
> different in vi than vim. For example, in vim, it is ':bn', ':bp',
> and ':bd' to go to next and previous buffer, and to close a buffer.
> Vi does not seem to hav
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 04:38:45PM +0200, Xianwen Chen wrote:
> Ted Unangst wrote:
> >I think the easiest option is to install vim and use that.
> I was going for that option. I asked the question on the list
> anyway. I thought I might have missed something.
> >In general, our policy is to only
6 matches
Mail list logo
