Hummm maybe I misunderstand but that look more like a proxy no?
FranC'ois Rousseau
On 10/15/07, CC)dric THIBAULT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firstly, thanks for your comments,
>
> 2007/10/12, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I don't fully understand your email, because some of your sentences
Firstly, thanks for your comments,
2007/10/12, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I don't fully understand your email, because some of your sentences
> aren't really gramatically correct, and some of them don't seem to me
> to be "technologically correct" (ie. the technology questions in them
> don't
I don't fully understand your email, because some of your sentences
aren't really gramatically correct, and some of them don't seem to me
to be "technologically correct" (ie. the technology questions in them
don't seem to make sense to me). From reading this thread, I suspect
others are having simi
On 10/10/2007, Cidric THIBAULT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank's for your comment. Unfortunately, i well understand the Nat
> process.
Huh? If you understand NAT very well, then how is that unfortunate?
I'm not trying to be a prick here; I honestly have trouble
understanding you.
> I's right i
Cidric THIBAULT wrote:
I'm searching a way to enable a transparent firewall (without ip adress),
probably in bridge mode.., with a capability of NAT. I know the interest is
not evident to nat some computers on the same IP lan, but it's for a client,
so!
You want to have a bridge that does N
You _may_ be able to apply the following setup (borrowing from
someone else's design :-) :
inside box (1)> firewall/bridge doing nat (2)-> default
gateway> internet
if1 if2
Let's just suppose that if2 has the ip address IP2 c
2007/10/10, stuart van Zee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > From:
> >
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I work on BSD 4.1, with i386 hardware.
> >
> > I'm searching a way to enable a transparent firewall (without ip
> adress),
> > probably in bridge mode.., with a capability of NAT. I know the
> > interest is
> From: Cedric THIBAULT
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I work on BSD 4.1, with i386 hardware.
>
> I'm searching a way to enable a transparent firewall (without ip adress),
> probably in bridge mode.., with a capability of NAT. I know the
> interest is
> not evident to nat some computers on the same I
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Cidric THIBAULT wrote:
> I'm searching a way to enable a transparent firewall (without ip adress),
> probably in bridge mode.., with a capability of NAT. I know the interest is
Hum... bridge and NAT aren't working at the same level. I think you'd
need to set an @ip address an
Hello everybody,
I work on BSD 4.1, with i386 hardware.
I'm searching a way to enable a transparent firewall (without ip adress),
probably in bridge mode.., with a capability of NAT. I know the interest is
not evident to nat some computers on the same IP lan, but it's for a client,
so!
It se
10 matches
Mail list logo
