On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:44:21PM -0300, Antonio Lobato wrote:
great!
thank you all for the help.
right now Im compiling the source for openbsd 4.0 stable (at least the
last, since it is no linger maintained)
I know it is better to use 4.2, but it does not depends only of my opnion,
I'm
On Friday, February 22, 2008 at 12:07:43 +, Edd wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:33:00AM +0100, Maurice Janssen wrote:
About a year ago I started to create regular builds of the -stable
trees (the two supported trees). You can use them, if you trust me ;-)
You can find links to some
great!
thank you all for the help.
right now Im compiling the source for openbsd 4.0 stable (at least the
last, since it is no linger maintained)
I know it is better to use 4.2, but it does not depends only of my opnion,
I'm configuring the firewall for a customer, and now I can at most
make
On Feb 23, 2008, at 5:44 PM, Antonio Lobato wrote:
I know it is better to use 4.2, but it does not depends only of my
opnion,
I'm configuring the firewall for a customer, and now I can at most
make a advice.
Advise them to use 4.2. There are significant speed improvements to
pf, among
2008/2/22, Antonio Lobato [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all!
I read http://openbsd.org/security.html (and stable.html), but could
not make
sure about my question.
If today I download old versions (say /pub/OpenBSD/4.0/i386/cd40.iso) of
openbsd, does it already includes the fixes
Antonio Lobato schrieb:
Hi all!
I read http://openbsd.org/security.html (and stable.html), but could
not make
sure about my question.
If today I download old versions (say /pub/OpenBSD/4.0/i386/cd40.iso) of
openbsd, does it already includes the fixes listed in
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:48:14AM -0300, Antonio Lobato wrote:
Hi all!
I read http://openbsd.org/security.html (and stable.html), but could not
make
sure about my question.
If today I download old versions (say /pub/OpenBSD/4.0/i386/cd40.iso) of
openbsd, does it already includes
On Friday, February 22, 2008 at 05:48:14 -0300, Antonio Lobato wrote:
Hi all!
I read http://openbsd.org/security.html (and stable.html), but could
not make
sure about my question.
If today I download old versions (say /pub/OpenBSD/4.0/i386/cd40.iso) of
openbsd, does it already includes
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:33:00AM +0100, Maurice Janssen wrote:
About a year ago I started to create regular builds of the -stable
trees (the two supported trees). You can use them, if you trust me ;-)
You can find links to some mirrors on http://www.z74.net/openbsd.html
I think it is great
One question I have is if 4.0 is stilled being patched? I notice that there
are several patches out in 4.2 or 4.1, for example:
005: RELIABILITY FIX: January 11, 2008 All architectures
A missing NULL pointer check can lead to a kernel panic.
A source code patch exists which remedies this
Jay Hart schrieb:
One question I have is if 4.0 is stilled being patched? I notice that there
are several patches out in 4.2 or 4.1, for example:
005: RELIABILITY FIX: January 11, 2008 All architectures
A missing NULL pointer check can lead to a kernel panic.
A source code patch exists which
Hart
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 8:41 AM
To: Mark Prins
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Updates for old releases
One question I have is if 4.0 is stilled being patched? I
notice that there
are several patches out in 4.2 or 4.1, for example:
005: RELIABILITY FIX: January 11, 2008
Jay Hart schrieb:
One question I have is if 4.0 is stilled being patched? I notice that there
are several patches out in 4.2 or 4.1, for example:
005: RELIABILITY FIX: January 11, 2008 All architectures
A missing NULL pointer check can lead to a kernel panic.
A source code patch exists
13 matches
Mail list logo
