On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 01:36:40PM -0400, I wrote:
> In addition, you might need machdep.allowaperture=2, per /etc/X11R6/README.
>
A fairly obvious typo. It should be per /usr/X11R6/README.
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:15:53AM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ANy issue with adding X to an upgrade when the original
> > version on the system did not have it? (I listened to way too
> > much bad advice setting this system up with my co-worker, now
> >
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 08:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
Rob Baldassano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> ANy issue with adding X to an upgrade when the original version on
> the system did not have it? (I listened to way too much bad advice
setting this system up with my co-worker, now I have to fi
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ANy issue with adding X to an upgrade when the original
> version on the system did not have it? (I listened to way too
> much bad advice setting this system up with my co-worker, now
> I have to fix it)
No. The only thing it does is unpack a distribution set (a bun
Hi guys,
ANy issue with adding X to an upgrade when the original version on the system
did not have it? (I listened to way too much bad advice setting this system up
with my co-worker, now I have to fix it)
--Rob
-
Eirik Goransson / Rob Baldassano
Mem
Thank you everyone for the useful information.
I think that this is actually the most I have ever received on any list when
I have asked a (to me) fairly complex question.
I have now been armed with insightful, and meaningful information that I can
move forward with.
I'll be
On 7/4/06, Rob Baldassano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a former co-worker says "NO don't do that, never trust upgrades". I tend to
disagree.
Are they a windows user?
-Nick
Rob Baldassano wrote:
I have been running OpenBSD 3.6 since the day it came out, and am now
in need up going to 3.9
The question is: What upgrade issues have folks run into?
Very few, myself. I've got at least one machine running which started
out with OpenBSD 3.1, and has been remotely upgr
Joachim Schipper [2006-07-04, 15:13:35]:
> Several Java implementations are in ports; Sun Java works on i386 only,
> I believe.
kurt has enabled jdk 1.5 on amd64 as well some time ago (-current only).
--
steven
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Joachim Schipper wrote:
Several Java implementations are in ports; Sun Java works on i386 only,
I believe.
Sun Java 1.5 works on amd64 in -current.
/Sigfred
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:34:53AM -0700, Rob Baldassano wrote:
> I have been running OpenBSD 3.6 since the day it came out, and am now in need
> up going to 3.9
>
> The question is:
> What upgrade issues have folks run into?
> I'm running it on a DELL desktop.
>
> BTW, some of the reasons I
On 7/4/06, mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 00:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Rob Baldassano wrote:
> I have been running OpenBSD 3.6 since the day it came out, and am now
> in need up going to 3.9
why don't you start here:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade39.html
Please be careful with
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 00:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Rob Baldassano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been running OpenBSD 3.6 since the day it came out, and am now
> in need up going to 3.9
>
> The question is:
> What upgrade issues have folks run into?
> I'm running it on a DELL desktop.
>
> BTW, some
I have been running OpenBSD 3.6 since the day it came out, and am now in need
up going to 3.9
The question is:
What upgrade issues have folks run into?
I'm running it on a DELL desktop.
BTW, some of the reasons I want to upgrade:
1. Support for PHP in the Apache mods.
2. Increased security
3
14 matches
Mail list logo
