On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 07:27:01AM -0500, Brynet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From what I can find, this is a GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M based
> chipset.. xf86-video-nv does not have the product ID listed in the
> attach structure, this could be due to incompability with the chipset or
> maintainer neglegenc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
2009/11/29 Brynet
:
> Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
>> Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk & laptop)
>> for most people because they do support most open source systems
>> (Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:01:18 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>You are a prick.
>
I don't know what his problem was but
Back in early September I bought a new netbook. A samsung NC20. It has
1280x800 video.
In the past I've had "fun" with video doing X so I thought I'd toss a
quick install of a
You are a prick.
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 06:43:01PM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 10:16 -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
> > Since your reply implicitly replaced "making" with "designing",
> > that shouldn't prove to much of a stretch.
>
> My reply explicitly emphasizes the difficulty in "designin
Oh, we have another troll on the lists! Welcome rhubbell!
May ignorance be with you and stupidity always guide your emails, amen!
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell wrote:
>
>> Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
>> discussion (might've been on linux kernel) a while ago about a
>> partially-open video card. Why doesn't the community
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 10:16 -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
> Since your reply implicitly replaced "making" with "designing",
> that shouldn't prove to much of a stretch.
My reply explicitly emphasizes the difficulty in "designing" software,
which is part of "writing" it. Otherwise, I mention I am
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:11:07AM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 17:08 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Soner Tari wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 21:30 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > >> Making hardware is a lot more difficult than writing softw
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:59 PM, rhubbell wrote:
> Why did I say that? Let's take a poll on this list of how many people are
> using one of those cards? Or any list, anywhere.
>
> I have not contributed to it in anyway. But why is that relevant? Can you
> explain? And how did you contribute?
Man,
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 17:08 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Soner Tari wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 21:30 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> >> Making hardware is a lot more difficult than writing software. So it takes
> >> more resources and more skills.
> >
> > Sorry
2009/12/6 rhubbell :
> Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
Your manner is counter productive, including for yourself. So why do
you persist?
Unless of course you're more interested in causing mischief than
getting anything out of OpenBSD.
Please, either adjust yo
wow now I have point. You are like kid on sand. Look they have thermometer
and you haven't :-P :-D You don't have even any respect for long time OpenBSD
developers or users which know a LOT more then you. Just because you are
unqualified user doesn't mean that you can shout around on everyone.
And
rhubbell wrote:
> Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
It has nothing to do with sensitivity, we just have an aversion toward
idiots.
-Bryan.
rhubbell wrote:
> Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
As distinguished from insensitive twerps like yourself.
Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:17:14 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
> fuck off troll
>
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:26:49PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:10:19 -0500
> > bofh wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:5
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:10:19 -0500
bofh wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:54 PM, rhubbell wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:14:00 -0500
> > bofh wrote:
> >
> >> Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
> >> another to the project.
> >
> > Gee, ok. What have you contribute
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:54 PM, rhubbell wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:14:00 -0500
> bofh wrote:
>
>> Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
>> another to the project.
>
> Gee, ok. What have you contributed to it?
> You don't want to converse. Fine by me.
You're a mo
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:14:00 -0500
bofh wrote:
> Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
> another to the project.
Gee, ok. What have you contributed to it?
You don't want to converse. Fine by me.
blah blah blah
go away troll
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 02:59:19PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:30:28 +0100
> Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
> > > discussion
Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
another to the project.
KTHX HAND
On 12/5/09, rhubbell wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:08:36 -0500
> Ted Unangst wrote:
>
>> More than I've ever spent on all the computers I've ever written
>> software with.
>
> How much would th
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:30:28 +0100
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell wrote:
>
> > Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
> > discussion (might've been on linux kernel) a while ago about a
> > partially-open video card. Why doesn't the com
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:08:36 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
> More than I've ever spent on all the computers I've ever written
> software with.
How much would that be? Ballpark. Doesn't seem like it would be very much.
Seems like you're just hand-waving without real numbers.
Wikipedia has a money-raise
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Soner Tari wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 21:30 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>> Making hardware is a lot more difficult than writing software. So it takes
>> more resources and more skills.
>
> Sorry Matthieu, but I have to say that this is utter bullshit, and I
> b
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 21:30 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> Making hardware is a lot more difficult than writing software. So it takes
> more resources and more skills.
Sorry Matthieu, but I have to say that this is utter bullshit, and I
believe such underestimation is the underlying reason that ma
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell wrote:
> Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
> discussion (might've been on linux kernel) a while ago about a
> partially-open video card. Why doesn't the community support that?
You mean http://www.opengraphics.org ?
What m
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:33:22 -0200
Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:20:16AM +, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Peter Miller wrote:
> > > I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800.
--snip--
> > Stay away from nVidia gra
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Brynet wrote:
>> Made the changes to nv_driver.c and built xenocara with the following
>>
>> # cd /usr/xenocara
>> # rm -rf /usr/xobj/*
>> # make bootstrap
>> # make obj
>> # make build
>>
>> Upon reboot when i use the "nv" driver X now recognizes my card, but
>> i
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 07:21:37PM -0200, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
> As said: I'm not a fanboy. I "thought" nvidia was doing something
> that was good enough to me, but actually isn't helping the community at
> all. [...]
Yea, `the community'. Who the fuck is that? Nobody managed to explain
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 02:56:05PM -0500, Brynet wrote:
> Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
> > Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk & laptop)
> > for most people because they do support most open source systems
> > (Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati at least.
>
> Made the changes to nv_driver.c and built xenocara with the following
>
> # cd /usr/xenocara
> # rm -rf /usr/xobj/*
> # make bootstrap
> # make obj
> # make build
>
> Upon reboot when i use the "nv" driver X now recognizes my card, but
> it goes to a blank screen (just looks like the terminal)
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Brynet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From what I can find, this is a GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M based
> chipset.. xf86-video-nv does not have the product ID listed in the
> attach structure, this could be due to incompability with the chipset or
> maintainer neglegence (..the
Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
> Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk & laptop)
> for most people because they do support most open source systems
> (Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati at least.
ATI(..now AMD) releases full NDA-free documentation on their grap
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:33:22PM -0200, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
> Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk & laptop)
> for most people because they do support most open source systems
> (Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati at least.
>
> I do know that Ope
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:33:22PM -0200, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
>
> I'm not a nvidia fanboy, but I've found the need to clarify what nvidia
> actually does for open source community.
You mean, what nvidia does to close parts of unprincipled
projects that like to call themselves 'open sou
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:20:16AM +, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Peter Miller wrote:
> > I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800.
> >
> > After a default install X won't start and i get an error which i think
> > is caused by nv. I created a
Hi,
>From what I can find, this is a GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M based
chipset.. xf86-video-nv does not have the product ID listed in the
attach structure, this could be due to incompability with the chipset or
maintainer neglegence (..the driver is very rarely updated).
--- xenocara/driver/xf86-
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Peter Miller wrote:
> I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800.
>
> After a default install X won't start and i get an error which i think
> is caused by nv. I created a xorg.conf file using "X -configure" and
> then changed the driver from "n
I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800.
After a default install X won't start and i get an error which i think
is caused by nv. I created a xorg.conf file using "X -configure" and
then changed the driver from "nv" to "vesa' and was able to get X
running, but only at 800x600
On Oct 19, 2008 4:30am, Jairo Souto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I updated xenocara from cvs, added the line you sugested in
>
> nv_driver.c and rebuilt xenocara. Then I tried to run Xorg
>
> without any xorg.conf and it did not run any more. Xorg.0.log is
>
> attached.
>
ok, that means that the 7
I updated xenocara from cvs, added the line you sugested in
nv_driver.c and rebuilt xenocara. Then I tried to run Xorg
without any xorg.conf and it did not run any more. Xorg.0.log is
attached.
--Jairo Souto (38)8814-4787
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:29:14PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Thu, O
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Jairo Souto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you, please, tell me how to add the card PCI id in the nv driver?
Add:
{ 0x10DE0533, "GeForce 7000M" },
in xenocara/driver/xf86-video-nv/src/nv_driver.c, after line 391.
(Sorry I can't generate a patch right now.
Would you, please, tell me how to add the card PCI id in the nv driver?
--
Jairo Souto (38)8814-4787
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Jonathan Schleifer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am 12.10.2008 um 15:30 schrieb Jairo Souto:
It's possible for Xorg to run on VESA mode 12
Would you, please, tell me how to add the card PCI id in the nv driver?
--
Jairo Souto (38)8814-4787
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Jonathan Schleifer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Am 12.10.2008 um 15:30 schrieb Jairo Souto:
>>
>>> It's possible for Xorg to run on VES
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Jonathan Schleifer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 12.10.2008 um 15:30 schrieb Jairo Souto:
>
>> It's possible for Xorg to run on VESA mode 1280x800?
>
> As this is not a VESA resolution: No.
>
That's true.
You could try to add the PCI id of this card to the list
Am 12.10.2008 um 15:30 schrieb Jairo Souto:
> It's possible for Xorg to run on VESA mode 1280x800?
As this is not a VESA resolution: No.
--
Jonathan
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had
a name of PGP.sig]
46 matches
Mail list logo
