On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:54:18PM -0400, Michel Blais wrote:
How much can I increase net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen ?
I'm now at 2048 and still seeing increase in net.inet.ip.ifq.drops.
This morning, it was at 21280 and now at 21328.
A little bit of congestion increase is not the end of the world,
How much can I increase net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen ?
I'm now at 2048 and still seeing increase in net.inet.ip.ifq.drops. This
morning, it was at 21280 and now at 21328.
I've change the système for a temporary more powerfull one (core 2 quad
+ 2 dual 82571EB) while I'm commanding and building new
On 2012-08-14, Michel Blais mic...@targointernet.com wrote:
I maybe found something, congestion seem high when I check with pftcl -si.
I don't think it's hardware related since CPU is under 50% use.
I saw this tread where Henning suggest to raise net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen
so I raided it to 512
Hi misc,
I got a little error here with a sysctl value in dmesg :
WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters
The value was at 6144 and I just change it to 9216 (50% more)
The system is also having paquet lost from 1 up to 6% and can have
latency up to 30 ms and changing the
I juste found how to get the boot dmesg :
# cat /var/run/dmesg.boot
OpenBSD 5.0 (GENERIC) #53: Wed Aug 17 10:07:52 MDT 2011
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
real mem = 4293656576 (4094MB)
avail mem = 4165275648 (3972MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS
I maybe found something, congestion seem high when I check with pftcl -si.
I don't think it's hardware related since CPU is under 50% use.
I saw this tread where Henning suggest to raise net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen
so I raided it to 512 instead of 256.
6 matches
Mail list logo
