On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Kevin Chadwick
wrote:
>> That's about the third time it's been recommended and I've kept meaning
>> to look at it. I've been installing it for ages. Just loaded it up and
>> from the name was expecting a graphi
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> That's about the third time it's been recommended and I've kept meaning
> to look at it. I've been installing it for ages. Just loaded it up and
> from the name was expecting a graphical curses browser but was rather
> pleasantly surprised.
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:55:21 +
Fred Crowson wrote:
> On 14/12/2010, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> > are rarely as bad. A graphical and simple (probably impossible) OpenBSD
> > browser, would really be something, but now I'm just dreaming.
>
>
> xxxterm should fit that description.
>
> hth
>
On 14/12/2010, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> are rarely as bad. A graphical and simple (probably impossible) OpenBSD
> browser, would really be something, but now I'm just dreaming.
xxxterm should fit that description.
hth
Fred
(Sent from xxxterm :~])
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:38:54 -0800
xSAPPYx wrote:
> Dan Kaminsky (http://dankaminsky.com) has been working on "Domain Key
> Infrastructure" bootstrapped of of dnssec that looks pretty
> interesting. I'm not sure where the video is for this talk (it was at
> blackhat/defcon 2010), but I found the
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Johan Beisser wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Tomas Vavrys wrote:
>> Is there a light at the end of the tunnel somewhere to make email
>> secure even for amateurs who don't know how to use PGP? I'm very
>> curious about the future of email, especially no
Dan Kaminsky (http://dankaminsky.com) has been working on "Domain Key
Infrastructure" bootstrapped of of dnssec that looks pretty
interesting. I'm not sure where the video is for this talk (it was at
blackhat/defcon 2010), but I found the slides..
http://www.slideshare.net/dakami/phreebird-suite-10
2010/12/14 Kevin Chadwick :
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:06:49 +0100
> it is very hard to persuade someone to use PGP in the first place, and
> even harder to believe they have a secure machine.
I have a great experience with Pidgin and OTR. Even a child could
handle the first authorization after a s
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:33:13 +0100
Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> Well, since Egypt we know that it's not going to happen.
>
> 2010/12/14 roberth :
> > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:06:49 +0100
> > Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a light at the end of the tunnel somewhere to make email
> >> secure even f
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:33:13 +0100
Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> Well, since Egypt we know that it's not going to happen.
>
> 2010/12/14 roberth :
> > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:06:49 +0100
> > Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a light at the end of the tunnel somewhere to make email
> >> secure even f
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> Is there a light at the end of the tunnel somewhere to make email
> secure even for amateurs who don't know how to use PGP? I'm very
> curious about the future of email, especially now. I would like to
> hear opinions of OpenBSD wizards. The t
Well, since Egypt we know that it's not going to happen.
2010/12/14 roberth :
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:06:49 +0100
> Tomas Vavrys wrote:
>
>> Is there a light at the end of the tunnel somewhere to make email
>> secure even for amateurs who don't know how to use PGP? I'm very
>> curious about the
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:06:49 +0100
Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> The thing is that it is very hard to
> persuade someone to use PGP all the time.
it is very hard to persuade someone to use PGP in the first place, and
even harder to believe they have a secure machine. Sometimes you may
find encrypted pdf
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:06:49 +0100
Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> Is there a light at the end of the tunnel somewhere to make email
> secure even for amateurs who don't know how to use PGP? I'm very
> curious about the future of email, especially now. I would like to
> hear opinions of OpenBSD wizards. Th
Is there a light at the end of the tunnel somewhere to make email
secure even for amateurs who don't know how to use PGP? I'm very
curious about the future of email, especially now. I would like to
hear opinions of OpenBSD wizards. The thing is that it is very hard to
persuade someone to use PGP al
On 13 December 2010 22:23, Joachim Schipper
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:11:16PM -0700, Travis King wrote:
>> Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
>> > Marti Martinez wrote:
>> > > Ted Unangst wrote:
>> > >> At some point you're going to realize that the javascript that
>> > >> decrypts your mail
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:11:16PM -0700, Travis King wrote:
> Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
> > Marti Martinez wrote:
> > > Ted Unangst wrote:
> > >> At some point you're going to realize that the javascript that
> > >> decrypts your mail has to come from someplace.
> > >
> > > A better alternativ
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:57:52 +1300
Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
> On 13 December 2010 16:13, Marti Martinez
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Ted Unangst
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> At some point you're going to realize that the javascript that
> >> decrypts your mail has to come from somepl
On 13 December 2010 16:13, Marti Martinez wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Alexander Shulgin
>> wrote:
>>> I know it might sound funny, but what do you guys think about
>>> feasibility of massivel
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Alexander Shulgin
> wrote:
>> I know it might sound funny, but what do you guys think about
>> feasibility of massively automatic PGP web mail with all
>> encryption/decryption done t
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 20:32, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Alexander Shulgin
> wrote:
>> I know it might sound funny, but what do you guys think about
>> feasibility of massively automatic PGP web mail with all
>> encryption/decryption done t
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Alexander Shulgin
wrote:
> I know it might sound funny, but what do you guys think about
> feasibility of massively automatic PGP web mail with all
> encryption/decryption done through javascript in the client's browser?
At some point you're go
> what do you guys think
Personally, ...
> web mail
... i consider that a contradiction, and stupid one.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 17:01, lh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what are the good available alternatives (security/privacy) for gmail
> you're using?
I know it might sound funny, but what do you guys think about
feasibility of massively automatic PGP web mail with all
encryption/decryp
Francisco Valladolid Hdez. wrote:
> I'm setting a small web/mail/db server for sell web hosting, it
> run OpenBSD 4.4. I want to know the different view point
> about the disk layout for this purpose.
The partitioning depends on the usage.
How much mail (# of messages and KB / m
Thanks for the suggest, I thin begin with a 100GB hard disk, for managing users
(web-mail-db) and allocate some dynamic web sites.
I share the opinion about the split /var, in the past only /var/postgresql was
split for me, is a good suggest /var/mail /var/mysql and /var/log
Thanks and Best
Hi Folks.
I'm setting a small web/mail/db server for sell web hosting, it run OpenBSD
4.4. I want to know the different view point about the disk layout for this
purpose.
I don't have sufficient resources for buying three separate machines
(web/mail/db) at this time.
I hope yo
Hmmm, I've been using "Prayer" webmail app for several years, it was/is
developed at Cambridge. There appears to be ongoing development of this
app, the last update available from the FTP site is dated 9/4/2006.
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~dpc22/prayer/
ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/e
If you don't want to run PHP, you could run OpenWebMail. It's written
in Perl or you could roll your own. Courier also has it's own web-based
software. Personally, I run Dovecot, Postfix, SquirrelMail and use
PostgreSQL for virtual mailboxes. I was running Cyrus and liked it, but
found it w
Hello all,
I was thinking of using OpenBSD for a Groupware Mail server, I see
horde has a OpenBSD port however it is written in PHP, I am aware of
the security concerns that PHP in general presents
wile not having delt with Horde or any of it's applications in the
past, is it safe to assume that
Well, it is not necessary to use MySQL, because roundcube supports
sqlite which is smaller and more efficient for this task (per account
preferences, address book, etc...).
Lars Hansson wrote:
On Thursday 20 July 2006 03:32, Whyzzi wrote:
Requires MySQL
And the rational reason for a webma
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 01:29:34PM -0700, smith wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:22:13 -0500, Eric Johnson wrote
> > Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
> > OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
> >
> > Eric Johnson
>
> Someone post
Lars Hansson wrote:
On Thursday 20 July 2006 03:32, Whyzzi wrote:
Requires MySQL
And the rational reason for a webmail system to require a RDBMS backend is?
Preferences and address books at least. Once you've got more than a
handful of users, it gets a little silly keeping all that in flat
On 2006/07/19 14:21, Freddy Moya wrote:
> In packages is horde, you can too search in the net about neomail.
horde needs an update for a security problem. someone with spare
time should try updating it and send the maintainer a diff...it's
unlikely to be difficult.
roundcube is nice but ajax-only
On Thursday 20 July 2006 03:32, Whyzzi wrote:
> Requires MySQL
And the rational reason for a webmail system to require a RDBMS backend is?
---
Lars Hansson
Eric Johnson wrote:
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
I've used Horde/IMP for several years now and like it. I wouldn't
exactly call it "easy to install," though - look around online for
walkthroughs, as
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:22:13 -0500, Eric Johnson wrote
> Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
> OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
>
> Eric Johnson
Someone posted a question about a week or two ago for a chrooted web-based
email system. Nick Holl
It is pretty new still, but I replaced SquirrelMail with it because
SquirrelMail is terrible. People seemed to like the change. Very simple to
configure, and it's pretty.
but it's pretty good too :)
--
Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Copy me to your .signature file and help
me propagate, thanks!
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:26:01PM +0200, FTP wrote:
> one problem though, it doesn't support the maildir format :-(
there is a unofficial/suckz patch/openwebmail to make maildir support at
http://www.agneau.org/openwebmail/
*the squirrelmail is a better choice*
// gsoares
mail support
> 15. mail filter support
> 16. message count preview
> 17. confirm reading support
> 18. BIG5/GB conversion (for Chinese only)
>
> Maintainer: Kevin Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> WWW: http://www.openwebmail.org/
>
> /bkw
>
> On 19/07/06, Eric Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
> > OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
> OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
In packages is horde, you can too search in the net about neomail.
Both are webmail for easy use.
t; 15. mail filter support
> 16. message count preview
> 17. confirm reading support
> 18. BIG5/GB conversion (for Chinese only)
>
> Maintainer: Kevin Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> WWW: http://www.openwebmail.org/
>
> /bkw
>
> On 19/07/06, Eric Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
> >OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
vin Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> WWW: http://www.openwebmail.org/
>
> /bkw
>
> On 19/07/06, Eric Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
> > OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
ort
15. mail filter support
16. message count preview
17. confirm reading support
18. BIG5/GB conversion (for Chinese only)
Maintainer: Kevin Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://www.openwebmail.org/
/bkw
On 19/07/06, Eric Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which web mail package is eas
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Eric Johnson wrote:
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
Ilohamail works for me and in my opinion it's better
than Squirrelmail. There is a demo version on the
site. If you have a working (IMAP/POP3) s
Eric Johnson wrote:
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
Eric Johnson
I've been using the sendmail (configured for Internet use) that was part
of the OBSD 3.7 install on my two servers for the past 6 months, with
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:22:13AM -0500, Eric Johnson wrote:
> Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
> OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
>
> Eric Johnson
>
http://www.squirrelmail.org/
// gsoares
http://www.squirrelmail.org/
May be not easiest to install, because of specific PHP requirements,
but manageable. Haven't heard about security problems much, and also
don't really know of any good alternative.
Thanks,
Pawel.
Eric Johnson wrote:
Which web mail package is easiest
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
Eric Johnson
49 matches
Mail list logo
