On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:35:31 -0500
stan st...@panix.com wrote:
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Na.
It's when
they won't use a consistent quoting convention
Dhu
Q: What is the most
I have a redundnat pair of firewalls (4.6) and I am trying to block access
from outside to the subet set up fr pfsync. I have the following rules
in pf.conf
ext_if = bge0
int_if = eme0
match in all scrub (no-df)
pass# to establish keep-state
block in quick from 10.209.128.20 to
On 12/22/2009 11:35 AM, stan wrote:
int_if = eme0
?
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:51:11PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
On 12/22/2009 11:35 AM, stan wrote:
int_if = eme0
?
Good catch.
But the test is from the outsiide, so I don't think this mistake is what's
causing my problems.
What I want to do is block all tarffic relate to the pfsync
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:51:11PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
On 12/22/2009 11:35 AM, stan wrote:
int_if = eme0
?
OK. pfctl -s rules shows:
r...@phfw2:etc# pfctl -s rule
match in all scrub (no-df)
block drop out quick inet from 192.168.254.0/24 to any
block drop in quick inet from any
5 matches
Mail list logo
