On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:35:31 -0500
stan wrote:
>
> --
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
>> Na.
> It's when
>>> they won't use a consistent quoting convention
<< Q: What is the most annoying t
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:51:11PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
> On 12/22/2009 11:35 AM, stan wrote:
> >int_if = "eme0"
>
> ?
>
OK. pfctl -s rules shows:
r...@phfw2:etc# pfctl -s rule
match in all scrub (no-df)
block drop out quick inet from 192.168.254.0/24 to any
block drop in quick inet fr
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:51:11PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
> On 12/22/2009 11:35 AM, stan wrote:
> >int_if = "eme0"
>
> ?
>
Good catch.
But the test is from the outsiide, so I don't think this mistake is what's
causing my problems.
What I want to do is block all tarffic relate to the pfs
On 12/22/2009 11:35 AM, stan wrote:
int_if = "eme0"
?
I have a redundnat pair of firewalls (4.6) and I am trying to block access
from outside to the subet set up fr pfsync. I have the following rules
in pf.conf
ext_if = "bge0"
int_if = "eme0"
match in all scrub (no-df)
pass# to establish keep-state
block in quick from 10.209.128.20 to
5 matches
Mail list logo